Lpc2000

Rebuilding my toolchain and searching where _udivsi3.o was compiled, I noticed 
that there are four versions of libgcc.a:

lib/gcc/arm-elf/3.4.3
lib/gcc/arm-elf/3.4.3/thumb
lib/gcc/arm-elf/3.4.3/interwork
lib/gcc/arm-elf/3.4.3/thumb/interwork

The first is compiled with no options. The second with -mthumb, the third with 
-mthumb-interwork and the last one with -mthumb -mthumb-interwork. By using 
-L to include the appropriate one (in my case, 
lib/gcc/arm-elf/3.4.3/interwork), all erros went away. So sorry for raising a 
flag for no reason.
Thanks a lot!

On Monday 04 April 2005 13:01, Robert Adsett wrote:
> At 12:00 PM 4/4/05 -0300, Leonardo Santos wrote:
> >         First, than you all for the answers on my previous question about
> > a C union
> >not working for IO access. I'm now compiling some programs with GCC 3.4.3
> > and newlib 1.12. I've download the source packages from
> > http://rod.info/arm.html and used his build script to build the
> > toolchain. All went very smooth. I've been able to compile FreeRTOS for
> > LPC2106 and tried to blink some LEDs
> >(hence the question about the C union), but when I try to use any code
> > from the newlib, I get the following warning:
> >
> >arm-elf-ld: Warning: /opt/arm/lib/gcc/arm-elf/3.4.3//libgcc.a(_udivsi3.o)
> >does
> >not support interworking, whereas test2.prg does
>
> It's complaining that the C compiler library is not compiled with
> internetworking.  In this case it's trying to link in a division
> routine.  Newlib does not provide these, they are built with gcc normally.
>
> Robert
>
> " 'Freedom' has no meaning of itself.  There are always restrictions,   be
> they legal, genetic, or physical.  If you don't believe me, try to chew a
> radio signal. "  -- Kelvin Throop, III
> http://www.aeolusdevelopment.com/
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

-- 
This is Linux country.
On a quiet night, you can hear Windows reboot.

Leonardo Pereira Santos
Engenheiro de Projetos
PD3 Tecnologia
av. Pará 330/202
(51) 3337 1237

Today Fortune tells us:
Fortune Documents the Great Legal Decisions:

We can imagine no reason why, with ordinary care, human toes could not be
left out of chewing tobacco, and if toes are found in chewing tobacco, it
seems to us that someone has been very careless.
		-- 78 So. 365.