> How about DMA controller (say 4 channel) period.? > > But while we're on the subject of crappy or non existent peripherals... > > What we really want in terms of Serial ports, Sensible I/O > configuartion, is something more like what Hitachi (Renesas) have > always had (SH1, SH2 H8/300H etc). The peripherals are rich, extremely > flexible, and always perform 100% as per data sheet - they are always > logically thought out. You can start reading a section on a particular > peripheral, and guess the rest, because the design is designed by > engineers who care. The peripherals are beautiful. On most Renesas > MCUs you can DMA from any peripheral to any other. I've worked on > many (approx 20) H8/500 H8/300H, SH7032 SH7043 SH7709 projects and I > can't remember a single erata sheet. The chips must have been tested > to death, and were a dream to work with. My experience with Philips is > a lot different, but I am told, 'well that's just Philips for you, If > you want chips that work as per manual, and are well documented, stick > with Hitachi...' > > But...the LPC2xxx is temping for new designs, because of lower cost, > and of course they're based on ARM - you can always migrate to other > ARMs without wasting too much of your investment in tools, time, and > energy. > > The ideal chip: ARM core but with Renesas style peripherals. > > If Renesas ever launched a new family of MCU with ARM cores, eveyone > other supplier would get a run for their money... > > Jane > > Robert Adsett wrote: > >> At 02:10 PM 4/14/05 -0500, Bill Knight wrote: >> >One small feature I would like is to have an interrupt generated as >> >the THRE interrupt is enabled, if the THRE bit is already set. This >> >allows characters to be placed into an ouput queue and the THRE >> >interrupt enabled as a means of both starting a transmission as well >> >as adding characters to a transmission in progress. It also allows >> >the forground process to do it without ever disabling global >> >interrupts. >> >> While we're at it, how about a pseudo-DMA process to deal with the >> I/O? That would reduce/eliminate the need for FIFO's. >> >> Robert >> >> " 'Freedom' has no meaning of itself. There are always >> restrictions, be >> they legal, genetic, or physical. If you don't believe me, try to >> chew a >> radio signal. " -- Kelvin Throop, III >> http://www.aeolusdevelopment.com/ >> > >
Message
Re: [lpc2000] Re: Who thinks the PC Compatible UARTs on the LPC are nice ?
2005-04-14 by Jane Highland
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.