Yahoo Groups archive

Lpc2000

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:31 UTC

Message

Re: [lpc2000] Who has better documentation ... Atmel or Phillips?

2005-06-25 by Alex Gibson

Pigeon wrote:
> What do you'll think? (please only tell me if you have used both MCUs).


For avr, have you looked on avrfreaks.com yet ?

Lots of code for the different compilers.

> My issue is, I have been working 2 or 3 nights to get interrupt driven USARTS working in C for my avr.. and no luck.. 
> 
> I feel if the documentation was better (even though they gave examples), this would of taken that long..
> 
> Is the documentaiton for the lpc2*** that much better than AVRs?

No not at all.

IMO Philips still have a way to go to meet Atmels level of
documentation. And atmels website is a thousand times better than Philips.

You can view tables fullscreen properly. Things a half decent web
designer should be able to do very easily.

Compare these two links
http://www.semiconductors.philips.com/markets/mms/products/microcontrollers/product_catalog/16_32bit/index.html
http://www.atmel.com/dyn/products/param_table.asp?family_id=607&OrderBy=part_no&Direction=ASC

Additionally Atmel lets you download it to use in excel

or
http://www.microchip.com/stellent/idcplg?IdcService=SS_GET_PAGE&nodeId=74
http://www.semiconductors.philips.com/catalog/219/282/45988/45993/45994/

and
http://www.microchip.com/ParamChartSearch/chart.aspx?branchID=1004&mid=10&lang=en&pageId=74

Lot more docs for the avr , lot more app notes.
Lot more code available on the net for the avr.

Should be able to get the usarts up and running in c , in a lot faster
than that on the avrs.

Tried getting the usarts working by themselves before adding the rest of
your code ?

Alex

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.