Hi Dan, That was the answer I was looking for. I initially wanted to use UCOS-ii, but can't justify the licence cost at this stage. Thanks, Peter. Dan Beadle wrote: > I did an early port of this to the IAR tool chain. It took a while to > get my mind around all the files, but, in truth, it is quite small and > easy to work with. The documentation is only available online. I would > prefer a PDF to a web page, but that is a nit. > > > > I am using FreeRTOS on several projects. I like the following features: > > > > - Lean (small footprint, only the features I need.) > > - Evolving (almost too many code drops. I am giving up on > chasing changes) > > - Tractable. I got my mind around the entire code base, because > it is so small > > > > In the past, deeply embedded projects often would not use any RTOS. This > brings true tasking to my systems without the overhead and cost of WinCE > or Linux. I considered uCOS, but this package does all that I need from > uCOS. And the price is right. > > > > _____ > > From: lpc2000@yahoogroups.com [mailto:lpc2000@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf > Of Peter Homann > Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 5:15 AM > To: lpc2000@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [lpc2000] LPC2138 and FreeRTOS > > > > Hi, > > I'm looking at using FreeRTOS on a LPC2138 based project. Does anyone > have any opinions, tips or experiences they could share on how > successful this combination is. > > Thanks in advance. > > Cheers, > > Peter. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Web: www.homanndesigns.com email: homann@... Phone: +61 421 601 665 www.homanndesigns.com/DigiSpeedDeal.html - DC Spindle control www.homanndesigns.com/TurboTaig.html - Taig Mill Upgrade board
Message
Re: [lpc2000] LPC2138 and FreeRTOS
2005-08-24 by Peter Homann
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.