Lpc2000

I understand, my question is, why not have a PLCC48 instead a PLCC44? Is it 
impossible to not have a PLC44 but only a PLCC48?


Em Ter 27 Set 2005 19:32, lpc2100_fan escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> there is a 48-pin LQFP package and that is just fine as is, the story
> is about the PLCC package, which is easier to handle but afaik does
> not exist as PLCC-48 but as PLCC-44.
>
> Bob
>
> --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, Xtian Xultz <xultz@t...> wrote:
> > Sorry if my question is stupid, but is it impossible to have a 48 pin
> > footprint? Why only 44 pins?
> >
> > Em Ter 27 Set 2005 18:19, lpc2000@yahoogroups.com escreveu:
> > > Enter your vote today!  A new poll has been created for the
> > > lpc2000 group:
> > >
> > > Rules:
> > > need to take off one pin from each side of the LQFP48.
> > > JTAG pins, Vdd, Vss and UART0 pins are not an option. Try
> > > to keep as much as possible functionality. Using these
> > > rules please select 4 pins. Data Sheet can be found here:
> > > http://www.standardics.philips.com/products/lpc2000/pdf/lpc
> > > 2101_2102_2103.pdf
> > > Chapter 5 (Page 4) has the pinout information
> > >
> > >   o Pin1
> > >   o Pin2
> > >   o Pin3
> > >   o Pin18
> > >   o Pin21
> > >   o Pin22
> > >   o Pin23
> > >   o Pin24
> > >   o Pin28
> > >   o Pin29
> > >   o Pin30
> > >   o Pin32
> > >   o Pin33
> > >   o Pin34
> > >   o Pin35
> > >   o Pin36
> > >   o Pin37
> > >   o Pin38
> > >   o Pin39
> > >   o Pin41
> > >   o Pin44
> > >   o Pin45
> > >   o Pin46
> > >   o Pin47
> > >   o Pin48
> > >
> > >
> > > To vote, please visit the following web page:
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lpc2000/surveys?id=12143932
> > >
> > > Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are
> > > not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups
> > > web site listed above.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>