Yahoo Groups archive

Lpc2000

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:31 UTC

Thread

simulator

simulator

2006-02-04 by G B

I, too, as a guy new to the ARM7, would find it helpful
to 'simulate' code well before putting it on hardware.

I have the gnuarm and eclipse with the Olimex board and
wiggler.

But, I have found that after many many years writing
assembly code (AVR now), that the simulator is invaluable in
new, tricky, routines.

On another subject...
What jtag and IDE for less than $3000 gives me the ability to
know real time execution elapsed time?

Thanks,

Glen

RE: [lpc2000] simulator

2006-02-04 by Joel Winarske

> On another subject...
> What jtag and IDE for less than $3000 gives me the ability to
> know real time execution elapsed time?

I would recommend IAR.  They offer pipeline accurate simulation.  When
requesting a quote, be sure to ask about the different product options. 


Joel

RE: [lpc2000] simulator

2006-02-04 by Joel Winarske

> > On another subject...
> > What jtag and IDE for less than $3000 gives me the ability to
> > know real time execution elapsed time?
> 
> I would recommend IAR.  They offer pipeline accurate simulation.  When
> requesting a quote, be sure to ask about the different product options.

I forgot to mention the Kickstart edition is free, and limited to 32k code
size.  Just fill out the info for free download:
http://supp.iar.com/Download/SW/?item=EWARM-KS32


Joel

Re: [lpc2000] simulator

2006-02-04 by Leon Heller

----- Original Message ----- 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "G B" <microsys@...>
To: <lpc2000@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2006 3:54 PM
Subject: [lpc2000] simulator


> I, too, as a guy new to the ARM7, would find it helpful
> to 'simulate' code well before putting it on hardware.
> 
> I have the gnuarm and eclipse with the Olimex board and
> wiggler.
> 
> But, I have found that after many many years writing
> assembly code (AVR now), that the simulator is invaluable in
> new, tricky, routines.
> 
> On another subject...
> What jtag and IDE for less than $3000 gives me the ability to
> know real time execution elapsed time?

Rowley CrossWorks for ARM.

Leon

Re: [lpc2000] simulator

2006-02-04 by Marko Pavlin (home)

Joel Winarske wrote:

> > > On another subject...
> > > What jtag and IDE for less than $3000 gives me the ability to
> > > know real time execution elapsed time?
> >
> > I would recommend IAR.  They offer pipeline accurate simulation.  When
> > requesting a quote, be sure to ask about the different product options.
>
> I forgot to mention the Kickstart edition is free, and limited to 32k code
> size.  Just fill out the info for free download:
> http://supp.iar.com/Download/SW/?item=EWARM-KS32
>
>
Same with Keil:
http://www.keil.com/arm/Default.asp?bhcp=1

Re: simulator

2006-02-05 by lpc2100_fan

One major difference between Keil and all other simulators. Keil can
simulate the whole LPC2xxx chip while other simulators simulate the
ARM core. 
So what's the difference. You can simulate a timer, incoming results
from an ADC... with the Keil simulator but not with the others.
If you want to debug tricky algorithms any of the instruction set
simulators should do well, if peripheral simulation is desired, the
only one I know is Keil.

The 16k version to check it out is free.

Bob

--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "Leon Heller" <leon.heller@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "G B" <microsys@...>
> To: <lpc2000@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2006 3:54 PM
> Subject: [lpc2000] simulator
> 
> 
> > I, too, as a guy new to the ARM7, would find it helpful
> > to 'simulate' code well before putting it on hardware.
> > 
> > I have the gnuarm and eclipse with the Olimex board and
> > wiggler.
> > 
> > But, I have found that after many many years writing
> > assembly code (AVR now), that the simulator is invaluable in
> > new, tricky, routines.
> > 
> > On another subject...
> > What jtag and IDE for less than $3000 gives me the ability to
> > know real time execution elapsed time?
> 
> Rowley CrossWorks for ARM.
> 
> Leon
>

Re: [lpc2000] simulator

2006-02-06 by Jerry [Signum]

> What jag and IDE for less than $3000 gives me the ability to
> know real time execution elapsed time?

Glen,

Simulation is good, but for actual, real-time timing analysis there
is nothing better than an emulator with trace. Trace was something
that was common on 8 & 16-bit MCUs, but for some reason is 
overlooked on many 32-bit devices.
Luckily, most Philips LPC2xxx devices have the ETM trace port, 
so you can get a JTAGjet-Trace to get actual timing of any interrupt
or event, elapsed time of a function, as well as other useful trace 
features for about $3,500. 
BTW - this is  how much you will have to pay for a good simulator
anyway.

Jerry
Signum Systems Corp.
www.signum.com/jtagjet.htm
==============================================
     26 YEARS OF EMULATION SYSTEMS DESIGN: 
  8051, ARM, OMAP, 80186, 80196 and TMS320 DSPs
==============================================
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "G B" <microsys@...>
To: <lpc2000@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2006 7:54 AM
Subject: [lpc2000] simulator


> I, too, as a guy new to the ARM7, would find it helpful
> to 'simulate' code well before putting it on hardware.
> 
> I have the gnuarm and eclipse with the Olimex board and
> wiggler.
> 
> But, I have found that after many many years writing
> assembly code (AVR now), that the simulator is invaluable in
> new, tricky, routines.
> 
> On another subject...
> What jtag and IDE for less than $3000 gives me the ability to
> know real time execution elapsed time?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Glen
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: simulator

2006-02-07 by martinbrendes

Glen,

if you want to do execution time measurements, you need a tool with
real-time trace and time stamp. Our BICEPS emulator is able to calculate
time differences (for example elapsed time of interrupt routines). This
is better than to simulate it and the tool price is within your budget
(see www.arm-emulator.com/products/facts.html
<http://www.arm-emulator.com/products/facts.html> ).

Regards

Martin

--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, G B <microsys@...> wrote:
>
> I, too, as a guy new to the ARM7, would find it helpful
> to 'simulate' code well before putting it on hardware.
>
> I have the gnuarm and eclipse with the Olimex board and
> wiggler.
>
> But, I have found that after many many years writing
> assembly code (AVR now), that the simulator is invaluable in
> new, tricky, routines.
>
> On another subject...
> What jtag and IDE for less than $3000 gives me the ability to
> know real time execution elapsed time?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Glen
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: simulator

2006-02-23 by michael_sonst

Lauterbach ICD is a very useful tool. The costs are about 2000Euro


--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "Leon Heller" <leon.heller@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "G B" <microsys@...>
> To: <lpc2000@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2006 3:54 PM
> Subject: [lpc2000] simulator
> 
> 
> > I, too, as a guy new to the ARM7, would find it helpful
> > to 'simulate' code well before putting it on hardware.
> > 
> > I have the gnuarm and eclipse with the Olimex board and
> > wiggler.
> > 
> > But, I have found that after many many years writing
> > assembly code (AVR now), that the simulator is invaluable in
> > new, tricky, routines.
> > 
> > On another subject...
> > What jtag and IDE for less than $3000 gives me the ability to
> > know real time execution elapsed time?
> 
> Rowley CrossWorks for ARM.
> 
> Leon
>

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.