Yahoo Groups archive

Lpc2000

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:31 UTC

Thread

LPC210x performance-MAMTIM; INT latency questions

LPC210x performance-MAMTIM; INT latency questions

2004-03-24 by roger_lynx

Hello,

I have started exploring LPC210x. Would anyone comment please, based
on their experience, on the following (that striked me)?

Quote, from the latest data sheet(2003-10-02)- MAMTIM:

" Flash access time is suggested to be 2 CCLKs, while in systems with
system clock faster than 40 MHz, 3 CCLKs are proposed."

1. How *realistic* is to expect LPC210x to run 60MHz with 3 fetch cycles?
2. Is the performance better than with 20MHz and 1 fetch cycle? 
Mathematically it appears identical (60/3=20/1).

3. What is really the *worst* case for INT latency?
3.1 Best case?

...[700ns given by ARM DDI0234A_7TDMIS_R4.pdf, pg 2-26) @ 40 MHz].
What it would be on LPC210x MCU, at 20MHz/60MHz as mentioned above?

Thank you.

Best regards.
--lynx

Re: [lpc2000] LPC210x performance-MAMTIM; INT latency questions

2004-03-24 by Peter Kuhar

> 1. How *realistic* is to expect LPC210x to run 60MHz with 3 fetch cycles?
> 2. Is the performance better than with 20MHz and 1 fetch cycle? 
> Mathematically it appears identical (60/3=20/1).

What MAM unit does is, it gets  128bits from flash  at once, so that is
good for 4cycles (4*32=128). So basicly CPU runs at 60MHz and fetches
128bits at once from flash at 20MHz(considering 3 fetch cycles). This
is ok for sequental code, but sux if there is a lot of irq handling.

/Pero

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.