Yahoo Groups archive

Lpc2000

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:31 UTC

Thread

Any experience w/ CodeSourcery?

Re: [lpc2000] Any experience w/ CodeSourcery?

2005-01-04 by Bruce Paterson

ggindele wrote:

> 
> I wonder if anyone tried their ARM toolchain - it was posted in the
> GnuArm yahoo group. 

Well it compiles ok. Haven't run anything yet as my 'home-made' Wiggler 
still isn't wriggling :(  The only reason I used code-sourcery was I 
came across it prior to WinARM. Both are Windows native rather than 
requiring Cgywin.
Note that it could be useful if you want EABI rather than ELF output as 
code-sourcery have compiler versions for either. ('Why ?' I can't answer).
I'm still in early stages of "getting things working" so can't give much 
feedback yet.

-- 
Cheers,
Bruce

Re: [lpc2000] Any experience w/ CodeSourcery?

2005-01-04 by Leon Heller

----- Original Message ----- 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "Bruce Paterson" <bruce@...>
To: <lpc2000@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 4:15 AM
Subject: Re: [lpc2000] Any experience w/ CodeSourcery?


>
> ggindele wrote:
>
>>
>> I wonder if anyone tried their ARM toolchain - it was posted in the
>> GnuArm yahoo group.
>
> Well it compiles ok. Haven't run anything yet as my 'home-made' Wiggler
> still isn't wriggling :(  The only reason I used code-sourcery was I
> came across it prior to WinARM. Both are Windows native rather than
> requiring Cgywin.
> Note that it could be useful if you want EABI rather than ELF output as
> code-sourcery have compiler versions for either. ('Why ?' I can't answer).
> I'm still in early stages of "getting things working" so can't give much
> feedback yet.

Did you copy my 'Wiggler'? Get in touch if you have problems with it, it 
works fine for me.

Leon 



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.298 / Virus Database: 265.6.7 - Release Date: 30/12/2004

Re: [lpc2000] Any experience w/ CodeSourcery?

2005-01-06 by Anton Erasmus

On 4 Jan 2005 at 15:15, Bruce Paterson wrote:

> 
> ggindele wrote:
> 
> > 
> > I wonder if anyone tried their ARM toolchain - it was posted in the
> > GnuArm yahoo group. 
> 
> Well it compiles ok. Haven't run anything yet as my 'home-made'
> Wiggler still isn't wriggling :(  The only reason I used code-sourcery
> was I came across it prior to WinARM. Both are Windows native rather
> than requiring Cgywin. Note that it could be useful if you want EABI
> rather than ELF output as code-sourcery have compiler versions for
> either. ('Why ?' I can't answer). I'm still in early stages of
> "getting things working" so can't give much feedback yet.

I have tried it, and as stated above it compiles OK. I have had a problem with
insight and the built in simulator under cygwin. I can load the code, singlestep etc.
But when I click on the "Registers" icon, I get an internal gdb error, and I have to quit.
I have not yet tried the Linux version. I get the same problem with an insight version
I built from the source, so it might be a "cygwin" problem.

Regards
   Anton Erasmus-- 
A J Erasmus

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.