Yahoo Groups archive
Thread
2005-05-21 by lpcarmed
I used LPC21ISP for a while with regular serial port. Now I'm moving to a USB based com port connection as the Olimex 2214 has a built in FT232. It seems LPC21ISP does not control the RTS on the FT232 device, that's on the Olimex 2214 header board. Other programs do, so I excluded the theory of a fried FT232. Does any one has experience with this issue?
2005-05-22 by Richard
You cannot use the automatic handling of reset AND P0.14 with that board, only reset. You have to remove the "BSL" jumper every time you download code. If you are doing that often, it may be worth your time to add on a simple circuit to have the RTS signal handle P0.14. See the RTS_DTR.doc in the files section. Richard --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "lpcarmed" <lpcarmed@g...> wrote:
> I used LPC21ISP for a while with regular serial port. Now I'm moving > to a USB based com port connection as the Olimex 2214 has a built in > FT232. > > It seems LPC21ISP does not control the RTS on the FT232 device, that's > on the Olimex 2214 header board. Other programs do, so I excluded the > theory of a fried FT232. > > Does any one has experience with this issue?
2005-05-23 by Richard
Also, reset is on DTR, I believe the Philips utility needs it on RTS. Richard --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "Richard" <richas@y...> wrote:
> You cannot use the automatic handling of reset AND P0.14 with that > board, only reset. You have to remove the "BSL" jumper every time you > download code. If you are doing that often, it may be worth your time > to add on a simple circuit to have the RTS signal handle P0.14. See > the RTS_DTR.doc in the files section. > > Richard > > > --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "lpcarmed" <lpcarmed@g...> wrote: > > I used LPC21ISP for a while with regular serial port. Now I'm moving > > to a USB based com port connection as the Olimex 2214 has a built in > > FT232. > > > > It seems LPC21ISP does not control the RTS on the FT232 device, that's > > on the Olimex 2214 header board. Other programs do, so I excluded the > > theory of a fried FT232. > > > > Does any one has experience with this issue?