Yahoo Groups archive
Thread
2005-07-02 by chalissery franco
can i port uclinux with the 512 kb of flash philips 2138 without any problem to my appilcation( which is less than 6 kb). --------------------------------- Too much spam in your inbox? Yahoo! Mail gives you the best spam protection for FREE! http://in.mail.yahoo.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2005-07-05 by 42Bastian Schick
chalissery franco <francochalissery@...> schrieb am Sat, 2 Jul 2005 14:42:07 +0100 (BST): > can i port uclinux with the 512 kb of flash philips 2138 without any > problem to my appilcation( which is less than 6 kb). Are you serious ? Shooting with 512KB ucLinux on a 6KB application ? Don't you think any RTOS would do a lot better (commercial or free) ? -- 42Bastian Schick
2005-07-05 by chalissery franco
actually i am serious on this matter but dnt hav much confidence on this matter . but i dnt hav much idea abt other rtos or availibility thts one thing, other i cant get any thing hard core abt the PHILIPS LPC 2138. these two things making things much complex. thanks for reply if u can do anything on this matter plz do reply... franklin 2Bastian Schick <bastian42@...> wrote: chalissery franco schrieb am Sat, 2 Jul 2005 14:42:07 +0100 (BST): > can i port uclinux with the 512 kb of flash philips 2138 without any > problem to my appilcation( which is less than 6 kb). Are you serious ? Shooting with 512KB ucLinux on a 6KB application ? Don't you think any RTOS would do a lot better (commercial or free) ? -- 42Bastian Schick Yahoo! Groups Links --------------------------------- Too much spam in your inbox? Yahoo! Mail gives you the best spam protection for FREE! http://in.mail.yahoo.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2005-07-05 by 42Bastian Schick
chalissery franco <francochalissery@...> schrieb am Tue, 5 Jul 2005 10:07:59 +0100 (BST): > actually i am serious on this matter but dnt hav much confidence on this > matter . > > but i dnt hav much idea abt other rtos or availibility thts one thing, > other i cant get any thing hard core abt the PHILIPS LPC 2138. > > these two things making things much complex. > thanks for reply if u can do anything on this matter plz do reply... > > franklin Maybe , you first try to get a keyboard which does not lack vocals ! -- 42Bastian Schick
2005-07-05 by Rod Moffitt
I second that - please use propper grammar if you want help on this
mailing list (unless English is your second (or third language, etc.), or
you are in a chat room for teenagers, there is no reason to muck up your
spelling with silly slang like that...
- Rod
--
___ ____ ___ _ ___
Rod Moffitt / _ \/ __ \/ _ \ (_)__ / _/__
http://rod.info / , _/ /_/ / // / / / _ \/ _/ _ \
rodANTISPAM@... /_/|_|\____/____(*)_/_//_/_/ \___/
=======================================================
~ Where loved ones are remembered http://memoriam.org ~On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, 42Bastian Schick wrote: > chalissery franco <francochalissery@...> schrieb am Tue, 5 Jul > 2005 10:07:59 +0100 (BST): > >> actually i am serious on this matter but dnt hav much confidence on this >> matter . >> >> but i dnt hav much idea abt other rtos or availibility thts one thing, >> other i cant get any thing hard core abt the PHILIPS LPC 2138. >> >> these two things making things much complex. >> thanks for reply if u can do anything on this matter plz do reply... >> >> franklin > > Maybe , you first try to get a keyboard which does not lack vocals ! > > -- > 42Bastian Schick > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >
2005-07-05 by 42Bastian Schick
Rod Moffitt <rodlist@...> schrieb am Tue, 5 Jul 2005 08:29:52 -0400 (EDT): > I second that - please use propper grammar if you want help on this > mailing list (unless English is your second (or third language, etc.), or > you are in a chat room for teenagers, there is no reason to muck up your > spelling with silly slang like that... Please do not top post :-) -- 42Bastian Schick
2005-07-05 by Lasse Madsen
Hi, > Maybe , you first try to get a keyboard which does not lack vocals ! Bastian... You never discuss such issues as he could be illiterate! What where you thinking.. Regards Madsen
2005-07-06 by 42Bastian Schick
chalissery franco <francochalissery@...> schrieb am Tue, 5 Jul 2005 10:07:59 +0100 (BST): (original text revised for readability) > actually i am serious on this matter but don't have much confidence on > this matter . > > but i don't have much idea about other rtos or availibility thts (?) one > thing, other i can't get any thing hard core about the PHILIPS LPC 2138. > > these two things making things much complex. > thanks for reply if you can do anything on this matter please do reply... I you do not know anything about ucLinux and/or usage of other RTOS, why don't you just put your application directly onto the chip for a beginning. Note: Before you learn to run, first learn to walk. In this sense, don't go for a beast like ucLinux or even Linux, just get small things running and if you get used to the tools and the chip try _your_ application. Regards, -- 42Bastian Schick
2005-07-06 by 42Bastian Schick
Lasse Madsen <lasse.madsen@...> schrieb am Tue, 5 Jul 2005 18:06:49 +0200: >> Maybe , you first try to get a keyboard which does not lack vocals ! > > Bastian... You never discuss such issues as he could be illiterate! What > where you thinking.. If it where misspellings or typos (hey, English is my third language and I am by far not perfect), but using of kids-slang (plz instead of please, u instead of you) means to me either the writer is lazy or a kid. Anyway reading such is hard and prevents peoble from answering. There have been several discussion about that matter (and top posting) in usenet. So if the OP wasn't just lazy, I apologize. Rgds (:-) -- 42Bastian Schick
2005-07-06 by Rod Moffitt
I know I am going to break my own rule by replying and thus wasting more
of people's valuable time, yet would you be so kind to keep your personal
usenet style commentary to yourself (or at minimum send it to the sender
and NOT to the list and wasting people's bandwidth and time): top vs
bottom post arguments belong with other religious flame mails (vim vs
emacs, linux vs windows...) in /dev/null/.
- Rod
--
___ ____ ___ _ ___
Rod Moffitt / _ \/ __ \/ _ \ (_)__ / _/__
http://rod.info / , _/ /_/ / // / / / _ \/ _/ _ \
rodANTISPAM@... /_/|_|\____/____(*)_/_//_/_/ \___/
=======================================================
~ Where loved ones are remembered http://memoriam.org ~On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, 42Bastian Schick wrote: > Rod Moffitt <rodlist@...> schrieb am Tue, 5 Jul 2005 08:29:52 -0400 > (EDT): > >> I second that - please use propper grammar if you want help on this >> mailing list (unless English is your second (or third language, etc.), or >> you are in a chat room for teenagers, there is no reason to muck up your >> spelling with silly slang like that... > > Please do not top post :-) > > -- > 42Bastian Schick > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >
2005-07-06 by 42Bastian Schick
Rod Moffitt <rodlist@...> schrieb am Wed, 6 Jul 2005 08:41:44 -0400 (EDT): > I know I am going to break my own rule by replying and thus wasting more > of people's valuable time, yet would you be so kind to keep your personal > usenet style commentary to yourself (or at minimum send it to the sender > and NOT to the list and wasting people's bandwidth and time): top vs > bottom post arguments belong with other religious flame mails (vim vs > emacs, linux vs windows...) in /dev/null/. Sorry, this is nonsense to mix this up. vim vs. emacs, linux vs windows, 800XL vs C64 : This is religious. I agree. But quoting style/grammar has nothing religious. Top posting simply makes it harder to followup (just look at your own answer). But maybe it's just my ancient opinion (no I don't like HTML email) :-) Just my last 2 cents -- 42Bastian Schick