Re: [milter-greylist] 1.5.11 with subnetmatch and addr
2004-11-03 by Brent J. Nordquist
... - Removed the subnetmask keyword - Stopped milter-greylist - Removed greylist.db - Started milter-greylist, saw starting with an empty list in logfile -
Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 132 of 144 · 7199 messages matched
2004-11-03 by Brent J. Nordquist
... - Removed the subnetmask keyword - Stopped milter-greylist - Removed greylist.db - Started milter-greylist, saw starting with an empty list in logfile -
2004-11-03 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Does it occurs if you remove the subnetmask keyword? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
2004-11-03 by Brent J. Nordquist
... Sorry, I meant addr as one person pointed out. I do have the correct keyword in my greylist.conf file ( addr ) and I know it s picking those up because
2004-11-02 by manu@netbsd.org
I released milter-greylist-1.5.11 ftp://ftp.espci.fr/pub/milter-greylist/milter-greylist-1.5.11.tgz MD5 (milter-greylist-1.5.11.tgz) =
2004-11-02 by manu@netbsd.org
... Do you have the same problem with the latest version? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Il y a 10 sortes de personnes dans le monde: ceux qui comprennent le binaire et
2004-11-02 by manu@netbsd.org
Hi milter-rcptfilter-0.11 fixes a build problem on platforms that didn t have strlcpy. ftp://ftp.espci.fr/pub/milter-rctpfilter/milter-rcptfilter-0.11.tgz SHA1
2004-11-02 by Brent J. Nordquist
Just wondering if there are any known bugs with milter-greylist 1.4 using the subnetmatch and attr greylist.conf keywords? I have tried subnetmatch /24
2004-11-01 by Matthias Scheler
... No, that won t work. After fork() you are only allowed to use Async-Signal-Safe function until you have used exec(). And fdopen() and many of the other
2004-10-29 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... On a system that doesn t fork using COW, that will cause a major memory copy. Otherwise it could be a good workaround. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
2004-10-29 by Sutherland, James
Another option would be to spawn a child process to write the db dump. Since each pid is limited. ________________________________ From: Emmanuel Dreyfus
2004-10-29 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Okay... I guess we could book a low file descriptor for dumping the database. Something stored in a static. The problem is that we ll need to do the same
2004-10-28 by Sutherland, James
Looks pretty much the same on this latest failure. handles open spikes and milter can t write it s dump so it exits. Oct 28 12:59:07 hns1 milter-greylist: [ID
2004-10-28 by Sutherland, James
This is an interesting article I found on sunhelp about somebody else having the same issue: http://www.sunhelp.org/pipermail/sunhelp/2002-January/015005.html
2004-10-28 by Matthias Scheler
... I couldn t open that file because you a passed file number larger than 255. From Solaris s stdio(3C) manual page: The integer constant FOPEN_MAX specifies
2004-10-28 by attila.bruncsak@itu.int
Hello, Tru64 UNIX man atexit writes among others: It is not recommended to call exit() from within an atexit handler. I wonder that exit() was called for
2004-10-28 by Sutherland, James
Geez, I can t keep milter-greylist running for more then ten minutes this morning. It starts into the Milter read(greylist): timeout before data read almost
2004-10-28 by manu@netbsd.org
... Here is the code that causes this failure: if ((dump = fdopen(dumpfd, w )) == NULL) { syslog(LOG_ERR, cannot write dumpfile %s : %s , newdumpfile,
2004-10-28 by Sutherland, James
Well I m back at it again with that HUGE mx. I had to drop this issue for a while to work on some other stuff but now I m back to it. Sorry for the delay.
2004-10-27 by Robert Grasso
thanks, I will test it. .-. Robert GRASSO - CEDRAT S.A. /v 15, Chemin de Malacher - ZIRST - 38246 MEYLAN Cedex - FRANCE // Tel: +33 (0)4 76 90 50 45
2004-10-27 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... The configure script has some provisions for building with sendmail 8.11, but I did not tested it for a while. Note that if it fails, you can install
2004-10-27 by Robert Grasso
Hello, I am running a *very old* OS : RedHat 7.2 with sendmail 8.11.6. I know, I should have upgraded yesterday and even before - well, I will as soon as I
2004-10-26 by Ethan Burnside
we had to bump ours up to 2048 from 1024. -- ... Ethan Burnside - Founding Member Kattare Internet Services WWW: http://www.kattare.com E-mail:
2004-10-26 by Garry Davies
... Ok so I looked at the file descriptors and the overall setting for the system is 8k with any one user having just 1k. What would you suggest these need to
2004-10-26 by Garry Davies
... No I don t but thanks for the help.
2004-10-26 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Check ressource limits, especially file descriptors. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
2004-10-26 by Enrico Scholz
... Do you have SPF support enabled? libspf has a poor code quality and segfaults on certain SPF records (e.g. reproducible for ebay.com). Enrico
2004-10-26 by Garry Davies
I am not sure how best to proceed with the following: I have 3 Servers running Sendmail/MailScanner/Milter-Greylist after 4-6 hours the greylist daemon bails
2004-10-26 by attila.bruncsak@itu.int
Hello, ... I moved the creation of the thread from conf_load() to conf_update() and replaced the pthread_join with pthread_detach. The conf_load is called
2004-10-25 by manu@netbsd.org
... Well, it seems you have a plan. Do you want to implement it? It shouldn t be very difficult, and it s true it would help for domains that don t have SPF
2004-10-25 by Matthias Scheler
... That s that the SPF support is for. ... You actually only have to bug the admin to add SPF records. :-) Kind regards -- Matthias Scheler
2004-10-25 by Gary Aitken
Hello all, I just noticed the 31 byte limit / truncation problem with domain names has been fixed, great! There is another problem, as I see it, with domain
2004-10-23 by Scot L. Harris
... I setup a system using 2 minutes and it has worked very well. From what I have seen most legit systems retry at least once within 5 minutes. Most spam
2004-10-22 by Garry Davies
... Thanks Graham I actually figured it out and they are all working fine! BTW what sort of delays are generally in use? I have been using 5m and most of the
2004-10-22 by Graham Dunn
Garry Davies wrote: [snip] ... Today s your lucky day: from the greylist.conf file # peer entries to enable greylist sync among the MX #peer 192.0.2.17 #peer
2004-10-22 by Garry Davies
I just added milter-greylist to one of our servers that takes several thousand hits per day from Spammers. Overnight my personal mailbox which can generally
2004-10-21 by Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, ... manu It breaks at mine on this change: manu flex -oconf_lex.c conf_lex.l manu conf_lex.l , line 150: unrecognized rule manu conf_lex.l , line
2004-10-21 by manu@netbsd.org
... It breaks at mine on this change: flex -oconf_lex.c conf_lex.l conf_lex.l , line 150: unrecognized rule conf_lex.l , line 151: unrecognized rule
2004-10-21 by Thomas Cameron
... I think I can - I was just being lazy. :-S ... Wow - that is smart. I m impressed! Merci Emmanuel! Thomas
2004-10-20 by manu@netbsd.org
... I don t see a reason why. But can t you whitelist the address bloc of your work instead of the sender addresses? The former is much harder to forge. ...
2004-10-20 by Thomas Cameron
Howdy - I am running milter-greylist-1.4-0 on a Fedora Core 2 box, Intel architecture. I have the following entries in /etc/mail/greylist.conf: from
2004-10-19 by Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, ... manu Moreover comment at the end of the line are not really manu supported. See greylist.conf(5): After some thought, I gave thought that it is still
2004-10-19 by Klas Heggemann
... Well actually no. I did not se the lines, since they were not adjacent. Perhaps I got the wrong patch when doing cutandpaste. Perhaps Emmanuel could make
2004-10-18 by manu@netbsd.org
... What takes so long? Do we have DNS resolutions at config file reload time? ... That s nice. This could be improved a bit by letting the thread that calls
2004-10-18 by attila.bruncsak@itu.int
Hello, I figured out that sometimes it takes me ages to reload the configuration file. The last time it took 109 seconds. (I am still investigating the reason,
2004-10-17 by Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, ... manu Support for funky chars like # is there to enable interoperability with manu non Internet mail systems. Something that may be a bit outdated
2004-10-17 by manu@netbsd.org
... According to the revelant RFC, it is legal. I copied the regex from the RFC: atext [A-Za-z0-9!#$%& *+/=?$^_`}{|~.-]{1,} qtext
2004-10-17 by Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, ... manu That makes illegal a # in the regex, something that might not be manu desirable. Ah, yes, I thought it. However, # should not apper in email
2004-10-17 by manu@netbsd.org
... That makes illegal a # in the regex, something that might not be desirable. Moreover comment at the end of the line are not really supported. See
2004-10-17 by Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, A friend of mine found a problem. The following line causes parser error: addr 192.168.0.0/24 # http://localhost/ It seems that `addr 192.168.0.0 is
2004-10-16 by klas@nada.kth.se
About statistics ... This is now # Summary: 391142 records, 299124 greylisted, 92018 whitelisted ... Now 61M. ... This is Solaris 9 on sparc. greylist.db is