MOTM

I guess I'm in the monority here, because I think Paul should go.  
But I agree with larry that he should take some new stuff, and maybe 
also exhibit with other vendors that offer products that conform to 
MOTM standard (Event, Oakley, Metasonix).  The point is that there is 
some hay to be made on the standards issue, and Paul leads the way.

Also, I think Paul has got as many customers as he is going to get 
(give or take a few) from the current Web population.  More publicity 
from the trade rags might get the non-surfer crowd excited.  Hence, 
more new customers.

That much said, I would hate to see the SEM filter put off because of 
NAMM.  In fact, selfishly, I would hate to see *any* module delayed!  
But new customers means good business means more modules down the 
road.

Mike

--- In motm@y..., "Microtonal" <microtonal@w...> wrote:
> There's got to be a better way to spend $6000.  MOTM got some good 
exposure
> at your first NAMM, ...