I have been keeping out of the many layout debates flying back and forth but I think Roger has hit home on something here. Uniformity of layout, while a boon for mechanical and electrical design, really hurts ergonomics. I have found that it is much easier to navigate a Moog modular than it is a MOTM. What I have found is that after a bit of time, I "know" where paritcular modules are in my setup so I just go there but when I rearrange modules because of new modules or whatever reason, I have a period of confusion while I relearn where everything is located. Yes, the number of knobs and switches varies on the MOTM modules and that helps but it isn't enough. The human mind recognizes shapes more readily than quantities. All this said, I'm not going to stop buying MOTM modules if the layout stays the same but I do believe there is room for improvement. I'd prefer that my MOTM has the staying power of the likes of Moog and ARP rather than something like an Aries whose designers seemed to be enamored with and hampered by a consistent layout/format philosophy. Eric __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/
Message
Re: [motm] Re: Grids, Layouts, Ergonomics
2002-04-15 by alt-mode
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.