I guess you're thinking of something more elaborate than just running it through a lag processor -- maybe a VC lag processor which is responding to something like a velocity CV from your initial CV source? JB In a message dated 10/3/99 9:22:07 AM, Ken.Tkacs@... writes: >Is there any way of making a quantizer that has a "softness" control? In > >other words, there would be an option where the steps are not completely > >discreet-the output voltage tends to "pull" the input CV to the quantized > >steps, but there is a softer knee? > > > >The reason I ask is that I've always wondered if a quantizer might help >make > >a Theremin controller a bit easier to manage. But one wouldn't want to > >completely lose the Theremin's 'melismatic' nature. > > > >Could it be something as easy as leaking a bit of the input CV into the > >output? I guess you could slap an integrator on the quantized output to > >force a glide, but that's not the same. > >
Message
Re: Quantizer Question
1999-10-03 by JWBarlow@xxx.xxx
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.