My vote is for panel mount. Stability is key, and I don't mind the exposed hardware. Mike --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@a...> wrote: > a) OK it's settled! Voices grouped *vertically*, with CV on the bottom. Moe, please mock it up. > > b) Looking at the MIDI jack: the thick MOTM panel is causing an issue. The standard pcb mounted > MIDI connector assumes a 0.062 thick panel. When the connector is butted-up to such a panel and > the DIN cable plugged in, this allows the outer plastic molded portion not to touch the front > panel (by about 0.025). The inner metal 'shell' goes all the way into the connector. > > Now, with the 0.125 thick panels, you have to have a large hole cut that is bigger than the > outside dimension of the "fattest cable you ever hope to come across". I measured all my MIDI > cables, the largest one was about 0.665 outside diameter. This means a 0.700 min hole to allow > for 'slop'. Well, I think that is too big as it looks a little strange with this giant hole where > you can see the pc board slightly. > > So, I'm proposing using a Switchcraft or Neutrik panel-mount DIN. The Switchcraft one has silver > (nickel-plated brass) flanges. It's part number 57GB5F. I haven't looked at the Neutrik, maybe > they have a black one. This does mean 2 'exposed' black screw heads along with the flange. > > It is about the same labor. The reason is that the pcb mounted one needed a support bracket and > PEM threaded stud. The panel mounted one I have to solder wires (yuck). So far as cost/labor it's > even. > > But, it 100% removes the "my DIN cable won't plug in!" issue, and I think it will be better > overall. Opinions? > > Paul S.
Message
Re: Now, another topic to vote on
2002-12-10 by Mike Marsh <mmarsh@stellcom.com>
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.