Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Message

Re: nice little review from AH ...

2003-03-17 by Mike Marsh

Oh Yeah!  They are beautiful, as are the rest of the bunch.  The 
highest quality, too, so they will be around a long, long time.
 
One more aspect that gets a little over-looked in my opinion is that 
the MOTM is *BY FAR* the quietest synth with respect to signal to 
noise.  It's an entire no-brainer to record this beast.  In fact, 
that's the main reason I chose MOTM (and sold off modules from other 
brands).  As a happy side-effect, I also got one of the best sounding 
synths avialable now or in the past.
 
Mike, big MOTM fan
 
--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, Chris Walcott <cwalcott@m...> wrote:
> I ordered a MOTM system and the first modules to show up were the 
oscillators 
> (and a power supply).
> If the quality of these oscillators is any indication of what I 
have coming, 
> then my patience will be generously rewarded.
> This is not a full, technical review. I just want to share some 
sonic 
> impressions that others may find useful.
> 
> For now I've got my MOTM-300 Ultra VCO and MOTM-310 Micro VCO 
patched into my 
> Moog modular system and they tracked perfectly right-out-of-the-box 
from my 
> Moog 951 keyboard controller.
> This is surprising since I bought the MOTM-300 used and the MOTM-
310 new 
> (both assembled by Synthesis Technology) and I had expected to have 
to do at 
> least a small bit of 1V/octave trim adjustment as I have with every 
other 
> analog oscillator that came through the door.
> But - they were ready to play as soon as they were patched in.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Synthworld@a... [mailto:Synthworld@a...]
> > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 8:22 AM
> > To: analogue@h...
> > Subject: [AH] MOTM oscillators
> 
> I'm using them in conjunction with my Moog 921B oscillators and 
they sound - 
> and track - great together. 
> (921Bs track much better than most people give them credit for). 
Upon auditioning the MOTM waveforms, I found that the MOTM 
oscillators give 
> me that "extra-hollow" square wave sound that is missing from the 
Moog 921Bs. 
> I had previously planned on tracking down some Moog 901B 
oscillators to get 
> that sound, but when I whipped up a simple "Lucky Man" type patch 
with the 
> MOTM oscillators I was truly shocked at what I was hearing. A 
friend of mine 
> was over at the time and he has owned both 901B and 921B 
oscillators and when 
> I made the patch glide down to the lowest note, he had the same jaw-
dropping 
> look on his face.
> And, I'm only using two oscillators (for now ;-).
> The sawtooth waveforms are exactly what I had hoped for - and more -
 since 
> they are much fuller sounding than I had expected.
> They also have the clarity of detail that gives me all the sizzle I 
ever 
> wanted from a sawtooth wave.
> 
> So, am I impressed? Absolutely.
> In fact, after three decades as a synthesist and the owner of 
several modular 
> synthesizer systems  (Moog, ARP 2500, Doepfer, Roland System 100) 
and 
> normalized analog synths (too many to mention), I've got to say 
that the 
> MOTM-300 and MOTM-310 are the best sounding analog oscillators I've 
ever 
> played.
> 
> My jaw is still on the floor.
> 
> Zon Vern Pyles

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.