MOTM

I think the suggestion to use a front-end A/D for the
MPC is dead-on. I, personally, do not run the MOTM
direct into the A/D, but that is me. It is easier to
run it thru the desk (a mixer or if you don't have
one, a preamp). 

Some folks I've worked with insist on a tube front-end
(Manley) as they insist an analog synth direct to disk
or direct-in is as stupid as running any line-level
instrument direct. 

I always thought the virtue of the MPC was the *tight*
MIDI timing for sequencing. No software sequencer can
touch it. That, and the obvious great tool for
songwriting, pre-prod, et.c

Back in the day, I used to do what you describe...
everything analog pumped thru an Akai Sampler before
being sent to tape. Definitely speeds up the process!


--- Robert van der Kamp <robnet@...> wrote:
> I asked before on AH, but didn't get a concrete
> answer:
> 
> I'm thinking of getting an MPC4000, for midi
> sequencing of 
> course, but mainly to be able to make samples of my
> MOTM 
> synth and use these to build a song.  (I hate
> computers for 
> that kind of creative stuff.)
> 
> I know the 4k has a bad reputation, but that's not
> what I'm 
> asking about here (working on that). What I'd like
> to know 
> is if the sound quality of the 4k at 24bit/96k is
> good 
> enough to capture the beautiful analog quality of my
> synth. 
> 
> I assume that 96k will be good enough to deal with
> most of 
> the aliasing problems, but is the AD/DA good enough?
> 
> Transparent? No colouring? That kind of stuff.
> 
> Did anybody ever hear the machine? 
> 
> Thanks,
> Robert
> 
> 

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html