MOTM

I wonder if anybody would be interested in buying my prototype
on which the MOTM version would have been based.

It's 19" 1U format, with input, output jacks, bypass switch and the 
10 potentiometers in a row. It has a very nice Schaffer panel, and
otherwise it's "open frame". Runs from +/-15V, i.e. electrically
MOTM-compatible. Same knobs I've used for my JH-5.
Looks very "valuable" when put into a rack (;->), and would
be considerably more expensive than a series MOTM version
would have been. (Just think of what that Schaeffer panel cost
me, and all the time I've put into this.)

Don't get me wrong: I haven't decided anything, and I'm just
testing the waters. But over the years I've built such a lot of
stuff, and I all love it dearly, but it's getting more and more,
and some of it has to go. So with that talk about the MOTM FFB
not going to happen, I thought maybe someone might be interested
in this.

Let me know - if there's interest, I can make some photos.

JH. (just back from holidays in Hamstede / Holland)



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Scott K Warren" <scott@...>
To: "MOTM litserv" <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2006 7:44 PM
Subject: Re: [motm] MOTM-450 FFB


Argh! Now it's "new design in Frac only"! I think it used to be "MOTM  
format first, Frac later with subset functionality". On top of that  
whole AudioEngine thing, it feels like the future of large-format  
analog synthesis is not good at SynthTech.

I have to go lie down now.

skw



On Sep 3, 2006, at 9:26 AM, Paul Schreiber wrote:

> a) it should not be on the website, my mistake. On of my goals the  
> next 2 months
> is to revamp the website, add more content and do a general  
> housecleaning.
>
> b) the status is this: if it does come out, which would be next  
> year, it will be
> in Frac rack because of the cost of the pots/jacks/knobs have  
> *doubled* since it
> was designed. Frac makes more sense.
>
> Paul S.
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



 
Yahoo! Groups Links