MOTM

your logic is puzzling to me.

>Yep, synthesizers.com is boring, looks like MOTM is headed in that 
>same direction.

Paul has always supplied high quality bread and butter modules. that 
will continue in Frac and 5U format. even the not bread and not 
butter wavewarper will reportedly continue as an assembled module. 
Paul has discontinued modules that do not sell in enough numbers to 
be viable. would you rather Paul supply unprofitable modules and then 
stop supplying anything?

if you regard the audio engine as boring, then i suggest you look up 
the word "boring" in a dictionary, because maybe you do not 
understand what it means.

>You give many reasons why what you are doing is all wrong and needs 
>to be changed, then you say you are #2 and must be doing something 
>right.

which part of Paul's logic do you not understand? Paul bent over 
backwards to keep kits shipping despite various events beyond his 
control, but they are now no longer financially or logistically 
viable. these are basic principles by which businesses live. the fact 
that Paul has supplied kits in the past does not free him from the 
economic and logistic reality of the future.

>I have not been able to support MOTM as much as I'd like, but I'm 
>concerned that when I can afford to, there will not be the 
>interesting MOTM modules available that I'd like to use.

i too could not afford to buy as many MOTM modules as i would like 
during the legendary halcyon "kit" period. is that Paul's fault?

i mourn the loss of the 700 - i didn't realise that i'd need 8 of 
them during the time that module was available. is that Paul's fault?

>I guess I'm the only one that has these thoughts, as noboday else 
>wants to voice their opinion if they are thinking the same, so I'll 
>drop it.

i can't think of many logical reasons to bitch at Paul. but i can 
think of various logical reasons to bitch at other manufacturers. why 
don't you go and do that?