I would be interested in this if it could do everything the Blacet/ Wiard Miniwave does (but better). Sounds like you are getting there. Here's what I'd like to see: 1. The ability to load my own waves. I have a lot of waves in my Blacet/Wiard Miniwave that I'd like to port over. Can I do that? If it's just a matter of writing a data conversion tool to convert from Miniwave format to MOTM-350 format then consider it done (as long as you post the MOTM-350 wave format). 2. The ability to morph between waves (in both X and Y) or to not morph. The morph will be very useful for audio waves. The non-morph for LFOs and lookups. 3. Make it work down to DC, not AC coupled. 4. The ability to use lookups (like the MiniWave). The MiniWave isn't an oscillator, it maps the voltage applied to the IN jack to a point in the currently selected wave. This is really useful because you can create any transfer function to map voltage A to voltage B (I call it an "arbitrary function generator"). Uses include: quantizer, pseudo- random sequence generator, voltage controlled distortion, tracking generator. > What the super-duper would have different than the "standard" version: > > a) 8 banks of wavetables instead of 3 (assuming we could generate that > many!) > b) the wavetable length would be increased to 1024 or maybe 2048 > samples > (from 256) which reduces high-frequency aliasing and allows more > 'fancy' > wavetables > c) USB port for adding your own wavetables (no, it's NOT a sampler) > or might > just have a '521 XPander connect to it to do the wavetable loading > (then > it's "free") > > I would guess that this version would be summer 2010 because of the SW > involved. The HW is more like the MOTM-520 but the SW is more > involved, and > somebody would have to write the wavetable editor/uploader.
Message
Re: [motm] 5U vs E350 differences
2009-10-19 by Scott Juskiw
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.