MOTM

Well, to be honest, I rather spend 100$ more and wait 3 months longer 
for a super duper version...

ToAd

Paul Schreiber schreef:
>  
>
> a) I am thinking *not* to spend the time to make a super-duper 5U 
> version. Rather, the 5U will be the same HW as the Euro, with 2 
> additional switches:
>  
> 1 - interpolation on/off (this disables the morphing, so it only 
> outputs the individual wavetables and not the blended ones)
> 2 - Quadrature waveforms on/off. Normally, there are 2 outputs: XY and 
> Z. The output the result of the X+Y morph and the Z morph 
> respectively. In quadrature mode, we re-assign the outputs so that the 
> Z is a phase shifted copy of the XY AND then abount of the phase shift 
> is CV'd. So, you can output any 'quadrature' (not just 90 degrees) 
> from 0 to 360 degrees out of phase.
>  
> b) these 2 options are jumper pins on the Euro card, but would be from 
> panel switches on the 5U.
>  
> Other than that, the wavetable set and the feature set would be the same.
>  
> b) shipping would be in late Feb/early March.
>  
> c) a super-duper version would cost $100 more, not be ready until 
> summer 2010.
>  
> Paul S.
>  
> 

-- 
ToAd
Tom.Adam@...	
www.thebigear.be

Has there been any discussion yet as to what features the "super- 
duper" version would have?

> c) a super-duper version would cost $100 more, not be ready until  
> summer 2010.

> Has there been any discussion yet as to what features the "super-
> duper" version would have?
>

What the super-duper would have different than the "standard" version:

a) 8 banks of wavetables instead of 3 (assuming we could generate that 
many!)
b) the wavetable length would be increased to 1024 or maybe 2048 samples 
(from 256) which reduces high-frequency aliasing and allows more 'fancy' 
wavetables
c) USB port for adding your own wavetables (no, it's NOT a sampler) or might 
just have a '521 XPander connect to it to do the wavetable loading (then 
it's "free")

I would guess that this version would be summer 2010 because of the SW 
involved. The HW is more like the MOTM-520 but the SW is more involved, and 
somebody would have to write the wavetable editor/uploader.

Paul S.

I would be interested in this if it could do everything the Blacet/ 
Wiard Miniwave does (but better). Sounds like you are getting there.  
Here's what I'd like to see:

1. The ability to load my own waves. I have a lot of waves in my  
Blacet/Wiard Miniwave that I'd like to port over. Can I do that? If  
it's just a matter of writing a data conversion tool to convert from  
Miniwave format to MOTM-350 format then consider it done (as long as  
you post the MOTM-350 wave format).
2. The ability to morph between waves (in both X and Y) or to not  
morph. The morph will be very useful for audio waves. The non-morph  
for LFOs and lookups.
3. Make it work down to DC, not AC coupled.
4. The ability to use lookups (like the MiniWave). The MiniWave isn't  
an oscillator, it maps the voltage applied to the IN jack to a point  
in the currently selected wave. This is really useful because you can  
create any transfer function to map voltage A to voltage B (I call it  
an "arbitrary function generator"). Uses include: quantizer, pseudo- 
random sequence generator, voltage controlled distortion, tracking  
generator.

> What the super-duper would have different than the "standard" version:
>
> a) 8 banks of wavetables instead of 3 (assuming we could generate that
> many!)
> b) the wavetable length would be increased to 1024 or maybe 2048  
> samples
> (from 256) which reduces high-frequency aliasing and allows more  
> 'fancy'
> wavetables
> c) USB port for adding your own wavetables (no, it's NOT a sampler)  
> or might
> just have a '521 XPander connect to it to do the wavetable loading  
> (then
> it's "free")
>
> I would guess that this version would be summer 2010 because of the SW
> involved. The HW is more like the MOTM-520 but the SW is more  
> involved, and
> somebody would have to write the wavetable editor/uploader.

Add me to the super duper list...

-Greg

-----Original Message-----
From: motm@yahoogroups.com [mailto:motm@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Tom
Adam
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 9:54 AM
To: Paul Schreiber
Cc: MOTM List
Subject: Re: [motm] 5U vs E350 differences

Well, to be honest, I rather spend 100$ more and wait 3 months longer 
for a super duper version...

ToAd

Paul Schreiber schreef:
>  
>
> a) I am thinking *not* to spend the time to make a super-duper 5U 
> version. Rather, the 5U will be the same HW as the Euro, with 2 
> additional switches:
>  
> 1 - interpolation on/off (this disables the morphing, so it only 
> outputs the individual wavetables and not the blended ones)
> 2 - Quadrature waveforms on/off. Normally, there are 2 outputs: XY and 
> Z. The output the result of the X+Y morph and the Z morph 
> respectively. In quadrature mode, we re-assign the outputs so that the 
> Z is a phase shifted copy of the XY AND then abount of the phase shift 
> is CV'd. So, you can output any 'quadrature' (not just 90 degrees) 
> from 0 to 360 degrees out of phase.
>  
> b) these 2 options are jumper pins on the Euro card, but would be from 
> panel switches on the 5U.
>  
> Other than that, the wavetable set and the feature set would be the same.
>  
> b) shipping would be in late Feb/early March.
>  
> c) a super-duper version would cost $100 more, not be ready until 
> summer 2010.
>  
> Paul S.
>  
> 

-- 
ToAd
Tom.Adam@...	
www.thebigear.be



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

I see an opportunity here to release a micro and an ultra version, much like the current MOTM-300 and 310 .... the micro based on the E-350, and the Ultra being the super duper version... 
Would that work?



--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...> wrote:

>
> > Has there been any discussion yet as to what features the "super-
> > duper" version would have?
> >
> 
> What the super-duper would have different than the "standard" version:
> 
> a) 8 banks of wavetables instead of 3 (assuming we could generate that 
> many!)
> b) the wavetable length would be increased to 1024 or maybe 2048 samples 
> (from 256) which reduces high-frequency aliasing and allows more 'fancy' 
> wavetables
> c) USB port for adding your own wavetables (no, it's NOT a sampler) or might 
> just have a '521 XPander connect to it to do the wavetable loading (then 
> it's "free")
> 
> I would guess that this version would be summer 2010 because of the SW 
> involved. The HW is more like the MOTM-520 but the SW is more involved, and 
> somebody would have to write the wavetable editor/uploader.
> 
> Paul S.
>

Yeah, I'd love a micro version if it was 1u.

On Oct 23, 2009, at 10:14 AM, torikoos wrote:

>
> I see an opportunity here to release a micro and an ultra version,  
> much like the current MOTM-300 and 310 .... the micro based on the  
> E-350, and the Ultra being the super duper version...
> Would that work?
>
> --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...> wrote:
> >
> > > Has there been any discussion yet as to what features the "super-
> > > duper" version would have?
> > >
> >
> > What the super-duper would have different than the "standard"  
> version:
> >
> > a) 8 banks of wavetables instead of 3 (assuming we could generate  
> that
> > many!)
> > b) the wavetable length would be increased to 1024 or maybe 2048  
> samples
> > (from 256) which reduces high-frequency aliasing and allows more  
> 'fancy'
> > wavetables
> > c) USB port for adding your own wavetables (no, it's NOT a  
> sampler) or might
> > just have a '521 XPander connect to it to do the wavetable loading  
> (then
> > it's "free")
> >
> > I would guess that this version would be summer 2010 because of  
> the SW
> > involved. The HW is more like the MOTM-520 but the SW is more  
> involved, and
> > somebody would have to write the wavetable editor/uploader.
> >
> > Paul S.
> >


NOTICE: This electronic mail message and its contents, including any attachments hereto (collectively, "this e-mail"), is hereby designated as "confidential and proprietary." This e-mail\ufffdmay be viewed and used only by the person to whom it has been sent and his/her employer\ufffdsolely for the express purpose for which it has been disclosed and only in\ufffdaccordance with any confidentiality or non-disclosure (or similar) agreement between TEAC Corporation or its affiliates and said employer, and may not be disclosed to any other person or entity. \ufffd
\ufffd

 


\ufffd

> Yeah, I'd love a micro version if it was 1u.
>

As stated previously, I'm going full-speed-ahead with the super-duper 
version. DSP/CPU design underway as we speak.

Paul S.