At 02:30 PM 8/18/2012, Paul Schreiber wrote: >Check the archives, I did this already. I sold *10* RR E350s versions >assembled and maybe like 12-14 board sets of the E340/E350 combined. I sold >around 8-10 sets of the E560/E580 DIY board sets. That's it! I checked the archives. They show that at the same time you announced a limited feature set "limited edition", you also said a "super-duper" version could be ready in 6 months. Nothing kills sales of a current product like announcing a forthcoming better version. This is a well-known business phenomenon - the "Osborne Effect", one that you should be familiar with. I, and I'm sure many others, passed on the RR version in hope that you would ship the super-duper version. And we're still waiting, 2 1/2 years later. :( I would be quite surprised if there wasn't a halo effect that negatively affected E340, E560, and E580 board set sales, too. >It's not that much of an effort (I will say same effort and LESS hassle) to >take a known working Euro schematic and lay it out for 5U/MU. But then there's the tooling cost to stuff a 2nd board, and the 2nd set of documentation, etc. The point of my suggestion was to bypass all that. ;) >I would rather just do it properly and use the 5U format, with the correct >knobs, grid spacing, etc. and cover BOTH sets of people: DIYer and >non-DIYers. Both get assembled modules quickly. Fine, that's my preference too, IF IT'S REALISTIC, given your historic lack of time to devote to SynthTech projects. The operative word here is "quickly". >If the 'group message' is that we desire new modules in a timely manner and >the DIY aspect is not the #1 factor, then what is wrong with the Kickstarter >approach? SMT & DIY don't mix, so I'm pretty sure the DIY aspect is not a factor at all. Timely? God, yes! The problem I see is, "there is no guarantee that people that post projects on Kickstarter will deliver on their projects." Your long track record of unrealistic delivery dates will undoubtedly discourage some people from committing their money. I'd love for you to prove the doubters (including myself) wrong, but I would bet against it if I was a betting man. :( I'm not trying to grind an axe here. I'm just not good at sugarcoating things, and I tend to be pragmatic in looking at other people's behavior (not so much with my own - ouch!). Please take it all at face value - I just want to know what's a realistic expectation for your 5U customers with regards to E-series modules. Sincerely wishing you success + new 5U MOTM modules, Jeffrey PS Looking forward to a possible MOTM-370. Seems like the front panel has to be at least 5Ux5U. Awesome!
Message
RE: [motm] Re: 5xx series in a MOTM format
2012-08-19 by J.D. McEachin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.