MOTM

I second (or third) that statement. What good is an analog modular if you
have to "surf" through an abysmal menu system to change or see your
settings.  -Nate


> From:
>"Tkacs, Ken" <Ken.Tkacs@...>
>
>
>
>
>I have to echo this sentiment. Unless there's REALLY no way to do something
>
>(as with the complexity of a sequencer, perhaps), personally I'd rather
>
>stick to knobs & switches.
>
>
>
>I already have a room full of ESQ-Ms, TX-81Zs, various Proteus modules,
>
>DVP-1s, and so on and so on... all with little weenie displays and data
>
>knobs... and what do I do? I decided to go buy a modular synthesizer to get
>
>*away* from it all. I would hate to see my modular start looking like my
>
>rack of Proteuses (Proteii?).
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>            -----Original Message-----
>
>            From:      Eric S. Crawley [mailto:esc@...]
>
>            Sent:      Tuesday, February 01, 2000 10:53 PM
>
>            To:      motm@onelist.com
>
>            Subject:      RE: [motm] VC EGs
>
>
>
>            I'd rather have lots of little EGs
>
>            than one massive one that I can't visualize the shape of
>
>because I need to
>
>            scroll through multiple "menues" of encoded values.  The
>
>reason I like
>
>            modulars is that I can see everything that is part of a
>
>patch and can
>
>            easily visualize the shape and settings by the knobs or
>
>sliders.  Let's
>
>            stay away from anything that takes encoders, except for
>
>sequencers.
>
>
>
>                 
>
>
>  <http://adforce.imgis.com/?adlink|2.0|2|82045|1|1|misc=3405;loc=300;>
>Please click above to support our sponsor
>