MOTM

Hardly dead IMO.  E.g. Oakley still going along fine making good stuff.

I am of the same ilk, chose MOTM for semi-DIY back in 2002.  #2 choice was Blacet but a) I preferred the bigger format based on what I lusted over when I was younger, and b) the MOTM list had much more interesting discussions.

Unfortunately many of the modules I lusted after never saw the light of day, the DoMOAS sequencer, the dual pan/fade VCA (this -><- close), any of the other CS-80 old crow modules, and the Rhythm Wheel sounded cool.  It would be wonderful if MOTM 4.0 went back to 1.0, but that's a pipe dream.

George

On Jun 6, 2013, at 1:28 PM, Doug Wellington wrote:

> 
>> Maybe we can give this a kick in The ASS!!!
> 
> LOL!  Now I'm thinking about that old line: "As busy as a one-legged man
> in an ass-kicking contest..."
> 
>> Somebody has to go *first*!
> 
> OK, so, riddle me this, is MOTM 5U a dead format?  Why or why not?
> 
> For me, I'm pretty much a pure solder-everything-together-myself kind of
> guy.  That's a huge part of why I got interested in this format.  When
> it looked like Paul was going to discontinue kits, I went on an ordering
> frenzy.  I think I have at least two of almost everything Paul ever sold
> (along with most of the Tellun stuff, a bunch of Blacet, etc).  I don't
> really need more of the existing modules, but I would love to see new
> ones.  (MOTM 4.0 anybody?)
> 
> I'm just not interested in pre-assembled modules.  I'm guessing I'm in
> the minority on this?
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
>