If I'm using a filter that has it (and since the '440 and '480 are my favorite filters, I usually am), I tend to at least try adding a CV of some sort to the resonance input, just to see what happens. So I guess you'd have to tell me what you'd use that board space for instead before I'd say that I could part with VC resonance. --Adam From: motm@yahoogroups.com [mailto:motm@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Schreiber Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 10:40 PM To: motm@yahoogroups.com Subject: [motm] VC Resonance: is it that useful? Thinking ahead to new filter designs....... Both the '440 and '480 have VC Resonance inputs. But, and let's be honest: are they *used* all that much? One filter more than the other? Doing this adds cost/board space that I could use elsewhere. The only patch that comes to mind is adding a Velocity to Res, so that the harder you play, the more resonance you have. But I think 95% of modular owners do not 'play' them that way. Thoughts? Paul S. /note this is cross-posted several places, if you are a synth nerd you will see it multiple times
Message
RE: [motm] VC Resonance: is it that useful?
2014-01-25 by Adam Schabtach
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.