MOTM

> From: JWBarlow@...
> I agree! I may have underemphasized what I consider the important part of
my 
> proposed 3310 module -- the SINGLE VC A, VC D, VC R, INPUT and the
associated 
> THREE reversing attenuators. I consider the four unattenuated VC inputs
to be 
> much less interesting or useful. 

This makes perfect sense to me (except the 3310 part).  As I considered all
the recent hub-bub about VC EGs, I could never really make the connection
(any Mr. Obvious fans out there?)  But, John has made it crystal clear to
me here.  One voltage, three reversing attenuators - Yes, I like the sound
of that.  And the idea that you would normal them through individual input
jacks in case you wanted individual CV control to satisfy the masses. 
However, for me, I can see one voltage doing the whole trick (like John
said).

Larry (pouring John a cold drink) Hendry