I was thinking more along the lines of easy switching of single oscillators during a stage performance. I didn't want to modify the 300VCO, it's perfect the way it is, my only problem is having to retune one oscillator if i want to feed two off the same cv and drop one of them 1 or 2 octaves. -Nate > From: >ivancu@... > > >In a message dated 3/16/2000 6:22:36 AM, davevosh@... writes: > > > ><< the single thing i hate the most about my doepfers vco`s are the "range" > >( octave) switches. a stable, wide range vco is limited by their addition, > >IMHO. yes, they make conventional pitch / note music easier but the whole > >idea of voltage control is freedom. >> > > > >AGREED! The octave switching should be on the controller-end, not at the > >VCO. That way us "alternative controller" guys who don't think along the > >lines of keyboards aren't limited. > > > >Somewhere along the line somebody made a compromise choice and decided to use > >a keyboard to control a synthesizer. But a synthesizer inherently is not a > >keyboard instrument. If you keep thinking along the keyboard paradigm you > >end up where MIDI is at, where it is very difficult to continuously play > >"between the keys". This is very limiting and instead of expanding the > >electronic music universe, attempts to constrain it. > > > >Ok, rant off. > > > >Ivan > > > >
Message
Re: [motm] Osc Controller
2000-03-16 by Nathan Hunsicker
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.