Don't forget using a self-oscillating 420 (and the forthcoming 440) as a sub-oscillator. The 420 tracks very well (though I haven't tried it over a wide range). The sine puts an unobtrusive bed in there; if you want to give it more presence, send it through the 120. David. > -----Original Message----- > From: J. Larry Hendry [mailto:jlarryh@...] > Sent: Monday, March 20, 2000 5:24 PM > To: motm@onelist.com > Subject: Re: [motm] VCO concept... > > > From: "J. Larry Hendry" <jlarryh@...> > > > From: "Tkacs, Ken" <ken.tkacs@...> > > > > Oh, okay-so the Triangle is fixed, but in essence the Sawtooth output is > > really doing what would be done if you skewed the Triangle anyway. > > You got it Ken. The 320 is one of my favorite modules. > > And, I would like to echo the comments concerning using the 320 in the > audio range. It bakes a much better sounding smooth sub-osc than the 120 > square waves out. Just use the 120 to sync it up, since the 1 v/oct scale > is close but not designed to be exact (per Paul). > > Larry H > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > GET A NEXTCARD VISA, in 30 seconds! Get rates as low as 2.9% > Intro or 9.9% Fixed APR and no hidden fees. Apply NOW! > http://click.egroups.com/1/936/3/_/529958/_/953594272/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >
Message
RE: [motm] VCO concept...
2000-03-21 by David Bivins
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.