--- In motm@egroups.com, "Dave Bradley" <daveb@e...> wrote: > That's it for now, I'm eager to put them through their paces tonight. > However, the first thing I must before I can test is to replace the jacks > with 1/4" Switchcrafts. Well, I lied. I was too impatient to switch out the jacks, not to mention it's prudent to verify your module works before you carve it up... I settled for soldering a MOTM power cable on, and used alligator clips on the input and output jacks. I didn't play with CV bank or wave select at all yet, just swept through them with the knobs. I like the Mini-Wave a lot. Once I got it calibrated (more later), it had a nice clean sound. It had a lot of interesting sounding static waves, some good sounding wave bank sweeps, the vocal formants were pretty nice, and the quantizer bank is awesome. Sweep it up and down with a triangle wave and vary the wave number, and you've got a fun arpeggiator. I'll probably buy a second one as well. OK, so to get the best performance out of this system you've got to calibrate it. The input waveform needs to be precisely -5V to +5V to play all the samples in any given wavetable. I found my 300s to have slightly less amplitude than that. I trimmed the Wiard's input gain and offset and watched the output on a scope to get a good clean sine wave output (using a sine wave sample, natch). You could do the same 2 trims by ear, since you can easily hear when the sine distortion is at a minimum. I also found that using my 320 was not optimal after I had the Mini-Wave calibrated to the 300s, which were pretty consistant with each other. So I may look into some precision resistors around the 300 VCO and 320 LFO waveshaper circuits, to get exactly 10V peak to peak outputs for all modules which might drive a Mini-Wave. All for now, Moe
Message
Wiard Mini-wave review pt. 2
2000-09-12 by Dave Bradley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.