MOTM

It's not 15 because you can't use the switching jacks in that configuration;
if you did, it would break the normalization down and you would have a 4x4.
Make sense?



-----Original Message-----
From: doc pendergast
To: motm@egroups.com
Sent: 01/07/2001 9:29 PM
Subject: [motm] Re: Please proofread this!

h3y,
i concur  with chaz, however, couple quick questions.
under the 410, should "vocal formants" be changed to "tunable to 
vocal formants"?  
under 820, 4th bullet, should that be "bypass: switch or remote"?  
using the colon symbol to denote either/or?
on the 910:  there are 16 plugs, so would it not be 1 in - 15 out,
dual 1 in - 7 out, dual 1 in - 3 out and 1 in - 7 out?  or did i miss 
somethin' in my math?
on the 940: should "passive modules" be singular?  so it's "passive 
module, requires no power"
peace,
doc

--- In motm@egroups.com, imorpheusl@a... wrote:
> minor errors:
> 
> -the MOTM410 description has a wording error (I think): When the 
same 
> old.......the MOTM 410 makes your track stand out. I think it 
should be  "the 
> MOTM 410 will make your track stand out" (this is just a wording 
thing...I 
> think I'm right) 
> 
> -the dimensions on the motm 700 bullet list (bullet #7) is one 
space to the 
> right of       the bullet, but none of the other model descriptions 
are like 
> this
> 
> - I belive "useage" on the 800 description should be spelled usage 
(bullet #6)
> 
> - the motm 910's description has an error:  "1in" should be "1 in" 
(bullet #2)
> 
> -Chaz
> [morpheus]