Re: [motm] Robert Rich Concert Report
2006-04-03 by Pete
Check out this picture. It shows the patch he used. Looks crazy to me. No wonder I loved the sounds that came out of it!
Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 146 of 690 · 34488 messages matched
2006-04-03 by Pete
Check out this picture. It shows the patch he used. Looks crazy to me. No wonder I loved the sounds that came out of it!
2006-04-03 by Paul Schreiber
... It is actually 9 separate patches which he uses for 4 different pieces. He uses a Mac laptop running Cubase to sequence the patches. He his very clever in
2006-04-03 by Robert van der Kamp
... Interesting. So he has a modular patch sitting there that works for different tracks, even from different albums. Like a stack of (weird) little mono
2006-04-03 by Pete
When I saw him play up here in San Jose I did not see him unplug anything on his MOTM. I don t think it would be a good idea to mess with the path he had up
2006-04-03 by Robert van der Kamp
Thanks for the review! Question: Does RR re-patch his big modular between songs? Or is he using one static patch (cable-wise) and only tweak knobs? - Robert
2006-04-03 by thomas white
Well I have to say that the Robert Rich show at Analogue Haven was nothing short of amazing. I really enjoyed seeing Robert play live and naturally enjoyed the
2006-04-02 by mate_stubb
These things rock, BTW. I used them on my PSIM conversion and really liked them. Stooge Moe sez: Buy em! ... added in ... terminal Pots.
2006-04-02 by John Loffink
Pot Chiclets are now fully compatible with Bourns Type 91 PC Terminal Potentiometers. See the updated photo in the link below. Pads were added in the center of
2006-04-02 by Paul Schreiber
Just wondering how things went last night at the Analog Haven Robert Rich concert? I hope the Frac modules were there :) Paul S. needs to *ship* the Frac
2006-04-02 by Paul Schreiber
Uploaded to here: www.synthtech.com/m650/m650guide.pdf Again, this is about 1/3 of the full manual, but it s all that is ready right now. It does give a good
2006-04-02 by The Old Crow
The moment I heard the opening part of Robert s Electric Ladder back in fall of 2004 at his studio, I knew it would one day open a HoS program. That time
2006-04-02 by Paul Schreiber
... This is critical: if you are unsure about wiring AC directly into these types of open frame supplies, get the wall wart. There are now small +5V 2-3A out
2006-04-02 by Richard Brewster
You are better off with a Power One 5V 3A supply: HB5-3/OVP-A Digikey has them for $36.00 plus shipping.
2006-04-02 by Paul Schreiber
It needs to be +5V at 700ma or better, *regulated*. But you can connect it to the 990 +5V terminal blocks, and then insert a 900 4-pin power cable into any
2006-04-02 by xamboldt
In anticipation of my 650 arriving, I m looking to add a 5V supply. I m assuming a linear supply would be preferable, but with all the cheap 5V wall wart
2006-04-01 by Paul Schreiber
OK, at 1:20AM I shot some rambling (and I do mean, *rambling*) video of me going through various MOTM-650 menus. www.synthtech.com/m650/m650tutor.wmv It s
2006-04-01 by mate_stubb
I m excited about this one. I sold my Expressionist a couple of years ago in anticipation. While I have enjoyed my keyboardless glorping fun, now I can play
2006-03-31 by ivancu2
I stand corrected! I had thought that MOTM had a nominal output level of 10VRMS but I hadn t noticed Paul s statement of 10V pk-pk (which is actually around
2006-03-31 by coyoteous
Oops! I think dat wrong. It s been a long time, but we need RMS first, right? So, 10V peak to peak is 5V peak, then 5V x .7071 (square root of 2 over 2) =
2006-03-31 by Oakley Sound
... someone will stick a regular TS plug into it at some time or another. But one notable exception to this rule is Digidesign, although there are others. Digi
2006-03-31 by Mark
... No, they aren t. ... Actually, most studio gear is more or less 22V pk-pk, which is 20dBu. Admittedly, the designation +4 dBu is a bit misleading. MOTM
2006-03-31 by Paul Schreiber
The V1.0 software does not include the Korg Volts/Hz table. It will be included in the next release. Paul S.
2006-03-31 by Robert Holmström
... I am designing two very simple modules right now for this. 1. Final Output Mixer. -Two stereo inputs and two mono inputs with pan. -Unbalanced line and
2006-03-31 by Jim Carlile
Hello, I have a MOTM 900 power supply for sale for $150. Great shape, works perfectly, will only ship to the continental US. Includes power cord. Thanks,
2006-03-30 by ivancu2
I stand by what I said. A direct box converts unbalanced line-levels to a balanced mic-level output. That is its job. Look up the Jensen JT-DB-E
2006-03-30 by gooboworks
WaaaaaaaHoooooooo!!!! This is great. I have been waiting for this one. To make it even better I have my birthday in April YeeeeeeeeHaaaaaaa!!!! Andy ...
2006-03-30 by coyoteous
... 22.22 dBu reference: 0.775 V 20.00 dBV reference: 1 V 22.22 dBm reference: 1 mW at 600 ohms (u = unloaded/m = 1 mW) ... 3.47 volts (p-p) 1.23 volts (RMS)
2006-03-30 by Greg James
Congratulations Paul! Having been on a few major projects myself, I can imagine how you feel right now. Do yourself a favor: sometime this year take a break
2006-03-30 by Paul Schreiber
Here are the *known* bugs fir the Version 1.0 firmware: www.synthtech.com/m650/bugs_v1.0.pdf The Sustain (damper) pedal code needs some work, and *some* of the
2006-03-30 by Dale Kay
are you saying that all outputs form each module is very high like this before you link to the next? or only the final is this high? If this was the case, I
2006-03-30 by Paul Schreiber
MOTM uses very large signals on the outputs: 10V pk-pk which is something like +24dBu Most studio gear uses +4 dBu which I think is like 1.5V pk-pk. Mics
2006-03-30 by Dale Kay
big delay in this email.. anyway, I been digging at Paul s group looking at specs... This info on what does work will come in handy if I use any of my other
2006-03-30 by Paul Schreiber
After 2 1/2 *years* of blood, sweat and tears, the MOTM-650 has officially been released. Dave Stooge Moe Bradley has the honor of getting the first one
2006-03-29 by mate_stubb
Here s what s going on in Stooge land right now: Cables: We have cables pretty well under control in Paul s absence. You can order solid cables as usual from
2006-03-29 by chad_kettering
Wow, My post really exploded into talks about DI boxes. I understand what a DI box is used for. Since the MOTM jacks are constructed the way they are, using
2006-03-29 by Charles Stella
Right you are Chris! Just checked I had assumed the Ring was grounded since I have never had any problems with either type of cable. Thanks, Charles.
2006-03-29 by Dale Kay (Inquisitor Betrayer)
Re: [motm] Re: How to connect balanced signals to the MOTMThere are even DI boxes that take Speaker level and covert down to line and mike... really do a
2006-03-29 by Jonathan Snipes
Well, I m wrong of course! Teaches me to post without doing my research :-) I ve *never* used a DI box that didn t output a +4 balanced line level signal,
2006-03-29 by Charles Stella
In my practical experience it does not matter if the cables are balanced or unbalanced. Most modern active balanced I/O s can tolerate being unbalanced without
2006-03-29 by Larry David
And usually a DI box will convert from unbalanced to balanced as well, which is why I think someone suggested using it to connect balanced signals to the MOTM.
2006-03-29 by ach_gott@yahoo.com
I think you re thinking of Peter Grenader s model 18. As for it being in MOTM format some day, I ve given up hope on EAR ever releasing in large format
2006-03-29 by Wheaton, Simon
Isn t there a module, either in production or at the design stage, that does this sort of interfacing? Simon Canberra AUSTRALIA
2006-03-29 by Wheaton, Simon
Sorry, but you are wrong! DI boxes take an instrument level signal and turn it into a mic level signal. They do not amplify a signal to line level (usually,
2006-03-29 by Henry Till
Actually, this is factually incorrect as well. A true passive direct box simply changes the impedance of a signal from low to high (or vice-versa), and does
2006-03-29 by Jonathan Snipes
... I m sorry to chime in, but this just isn t true. DI boxes take an unbalanced signal and AMPLIFY it to a balanced line-level signal. Useful when you re
2006-03-29 by ivancu@aol.com
Don t use a direct box. Most direct boxes will take a line-level input and attenuate it to mic level. You WANT a high-level line input going to the MOTM. A
2006-03-29 by evening_soundgate
Cases are in VG/Exc. cond. I just don t use them. $100 each plus shipping/paypal looking for a Stooge Time Machine panel. just in case you have one you aren t
2006-03-29 by Dale Kay (Inquisitor Betrayer)
was reading with interest here... microphones generally use xlr cables, they tend to have voltage levels in the microvolt range. also some use phantom power,
2006-03-29 by xamboldt
Actually the Ring connector floats in MOTM jacks - it s not connected to anything. Some other 1/4 jacks connect the ring to ground, but not Switchcraft 112A.
2006-03-29 by Mark
You do not need a direct box or any sort of transformer adapter. If the audio interface for your DAW uses TRS for balanced inputs and outputs, then simply use