Weekend '420 skill-tester.
2006-02-25 by Matthew Hiscock
Hi all, I just assembled a 420 and am getting a strange problem. I wonder if anyone has any thoughts on where the problem might lie: In HP mode the filter
Messages
Browse messages
Page 153 of 690 · 34488 messages matched
FW: [motm] Site is back up
2006-02-24 by Tkacs, Ken
It sounds... it sounds like a euphemism for something kinda dirty, Paul. You sure you wanna be doing that? ... From: motm@yahoogroups.com
Site is back up
2006-02-24 by Paul Schreiber
OK, I ve propagated my DNS Name Servers , whatever that means. Paul S. wants to propagate his computer out the window
Re: [motm] Re: Announcing: Pot Chiclets
2006-02-23 by Scott K Warren
Me too! -- skw
RE: [motm] Announcing: Pot Chiclets
2006-02-23 by John Loffink
To answer some questions, these will work with Bourns Type 91 PC terminal pots as well. The pot will just overhang the Pot Chiclet a little bit. John Loffink
Re: Announcing: Pot Chiclets
2006-02-23 by djbrow54
Thanks! I was hopeful someone would do this. I have cut up some small perfboards to accomplish the same but this is so much nicer. Expect my order shortly. -
Announcing: Pot Chiclets
2006-02-23 by John Loffink
An aid for assembly of MOTM kits, DIY kits and module conversions using Spectrol pots. Instead of painstaking J lead preparation, Spectrol pots are mounted to
RE: [motm] gate processor preview
2006-02-23 by John Loffink
Paul, Thanks for clearing that up. With the panel options this would create it seems well worth whatever cost increase might occur for flat rails. Dual row
Fw: [motm] gate processor preview
2006-02-23 by Paul Haneberg
Sorry, this was meant for the group, not just for John Paul H. ... From: Paul Haneberg To: John Loffink Sent:
Website move, but a glitch has occurred
2006-02-23 by Paul Schreiber
The site at www.synthtech.com has been move from Florida to San Jose, CA. The new IP address is: 207.57.21.154 There will be a mirror of the previous site for
RE: [motm] gate processor preview
2006-02-23 by John Loffink
? The countersunk screw holes conflict with some of the 0.5U mounting locations. John Loffink The Microtonal Synthesis Web Site
Re: [motm] gate processor preview
2006-02-23 by Paul Haneberg
No, this assumes you could mount panels in 1.5U or .5U increments across 6U flat rail boundaries. The only assumption would be that you have a total of X*6U,
RE: [motm] .5U module increments
2006-02-23 by John Loffink
Yes, the limitation of 1.5U on specific 3U boundaries would work for me. I wouldn t bother with a 2.5U panel. It is the small intermediate size that s the
.5U module increments
2006-02-23 by john mahoney
... From: John Loffink ... Are you saying that this would or would not work for you, then? -- john
Re: [motm] gate processor preview
2006-02-23 by john mahoney
... From: Paul Haneberg ... Thanks, Paul! This is cool. Why should Doepfer users have all the pleasure of varied module widths? :-) ... I agree (obviously).
Zeroscillator Update
2006-02-22 by Cynthia Webster
Howdy All! The price of Zeroscillators is Going Up March 1st to $750 Here at Cyndustries we are pleased to announce that we ve shipped (40) Zeroscillators in
Zeroscillator Update
2006-02-22 by Cynthia Webster
Howdy All! The price of Zeroscillators is Going Up March 1st to $750 Here at Cyndustries we are pleased to announce that we ve shipped (40) Zeroscillators in
RE: [motm] gate processor preview
2006-02-22 by John Loffink
This assumes the 1.5U panels are mounted only within 6U flat rail boundaries. You couldn t cross the 1.5U panel across flat rails. To be honest, that s
RE: [motm] gate processor preview
2006-02-22 by Paul Haneberg
No, the location of the countersunk holes for mounting to the wood does not change. They would be located at the gap between where 2 half U panels would
RE: [motm] gate processor preview
2006-02-22 by John Loffink
Does this change the location of the screws which mount the rails to the wood? If so it would make it a little more difficult, though not impossible, for
RE: [motm] gate processor preview
2006-02-22 by Paul Haneberg
I have done the layout. It is indeed possible to make Stooge Rails with holes for mounting in .5U increments. This means you could have modules which are .5U,
RE: [motm] gate processor preview
2006-02-22 by Scott Juskiw
... The Stooge flat rails are 6U wide, you could fit 4 of these 1.5U wide panels in them. Wish we had thought of this years ago. It s too late for me now, but
RE: [motm] gate processor preview
2006-02-22 by Paul Haneberg
Actually I was thinking about this as well. It is possible that we could redesign the stooge flat rails to accommodate a 1.5U option. I would have to play
RE: [motm] gate processor preview
2006-02-22 by John Loffink
You know, I was thinking the same thing just a few days ago, inspired by the same Tellun double row panels. A 1.5 wide module would likely enable two rows of
Re: [motm] gate processor preview
2006-02-22 by john mahoney
... From: Richard Brewster ... Ha! ;-D ... Proof plenty. ... Sure thing. I ve got oodles of sketches, myself. ... Agreed. Would it make any sense to have
Re: [motm] gate processor preview
2006-02-22 by Richard Brewster
It was an unfortunate choice of words, I suppose. No, I don t really mind different knob sizes. Proof:: http://www.pugix.com/bottom-cabinet.htm#blacetmixer
Re: [motm] gate processor preview
2006-02-22 by Scott Juskiw
... You re absolutely right. There are some mods to this circuit that would add a couple of toggle switches as well. Some people may choose to build this as a
Re: [motm] gate processor preview
2006-02-22 by john mahoney
... From: Richard Brewster ... Good analysis. ... Unfortunately meaning that you don t like the smaller knobs? Or, you just don t like to mix and match
Re: [motm] gate processor preview
2006-02-22 by Richard Brewster
It happens that the dual gate processor *could* be fitted into a standard MOTM panel with 4 normal size knobs, if you omitted the buttons or used small
Re: VC LAG
2006-02-21 by ithaib
No offense taken.... What I meant though was that I got them to work. with an LFO it s easy (and you can actually get a cool effect with it, it kicks in
Re: [motm] Re: Vocal Filter?
2006-02-21 by Marc Bareille
Hi John, ... I think the info did not cross yet the oceans very well whatever some web sites say... the X32 has been released 2 years ago (2004) ... so it
Re: [motm] gate processor preview
2006-02-21 by john mahoney
... From: Scott Juskiw ... Nice modules, and I like the compact layout. I almost started a do you like the smaller knobs poll on this group the last time
FW: [motm] Re: MOTM & me turn up....
2006-02-21 by Tkacs, Ken
That s the boat I m in. I can still see walls, windows, and floor in the pictures posted...not very easy to do in my studio, and it s cramping my style. I m
RE: [motm] Re: MOTM & me turn up....
2006-02-21 by Neil Bradley
... I ll make it known, that no matter how messy my office is, there s nothing gross in it. No undiscovered cat puke, dirty underwear, uneaten sandwiches,
Re: [motm] gate processor preview
2006-02-21 by Overand
I know gate processor/delays are not new, but still, this is un-freaking-believable. Imagine setting up your synth so that your delay effects (which i
Re: [motm] Re: VC LAG
2006-02-21 by Overand
That is actually not the proper behavior of these inputs. The CV inputs are the equivalent of turning the up, down, up/down pots themselves. there s a
Fwd: Re: [motm] Re: Vocal Filter?
2006-02-21 by eric f
Too few knobs for my taste. Donnez-moi La Mère (des touts Vocoders)! e Matthew Hiscock wrote: Gotta say - that sounds ridiculously
Re: [motm] Re: Vocal Filter?
2006-02-21 by Matthew Hiscock
Gotta say - that sounds ridiculously good. Or as they might say: Ça, c est dingue! Matthew ... __________________________________________________
Re: [motm] gate processor preview
2006-02-21 by Matthew Hiscock
Prototype or not, I do dig the clear iMac look. Not sure how practical it would be, but it sure looks cool. ...
Re: gate processor preview
2006-02-21 by Mike Marsh
Hey Scott - This looks really good. # MUUBs to build, right? Just what the doctor ordered... Mike
gate processor preview
2006-02-21 by Scott Juskiw
I got the prototype of my dual gate processor finished today. Thought I d share this preview image: http://www.tellun.com/motm/diy/tln866/preview.jpg No docs
Re: VC LAG
2006-02-21 by ithaib
Got it, thanks.... I fed an LFO into the inputs and it turns them on and off. Maybe when I did it before the LFO was going too fast? Maybe I was dreaming....
Re: [motm] Re: VC LAG
2006-02-20 by Richard Brewster
Yes. It is almost certain that if the UP, DOWN, and UP/DOWN pots work as expected, the corresponding VC inputs also work. They go right to the pots.
Re: [motm] Re: MOTM & me turn up....
2006-02-20 by Geoff
I ll tell you one thing: my studio is *too* messy to work in. Some clutter and mess is OK, but past a certain point, it makes it difficult to focus. So...
RE: [motm] Re: MOTM & me turn up....
2006-02-20 by Adam Schabtach
In my admittedly limited experience, the most creative people I ve encountered are slobs to some degree or another. Conversely, many of the beautiful,
Re: VC LAG
2006-02-20 by mate_stubb
Besides the possibility that it has an assembly error and does not work, could it accidentally be in bypass mode? Bypass switch mounted upside down? Is the
Re: [motm] Re: MOTM & me turn up....
2006-02-20 by HDibrell@aol.com
In a message dated 2/19/2006 6:36:21 P.M. Central Standard Time, osthelder@netscape.net writes: it s nice to know that I m not the only organizationally
Re: MOTM & me turn up....
2006-02-20 by Charles Osthelder
Wow Neil! What a cozy space... Suddenly, I don t feel like such a slob. Though my studio would make you all look like you re paying for maid service (don t
AHNE 2006 - Mark your calendars!
2006-02-19 by alt-mode
Announcing Analogue Heaven NorthEast (AHNE) 2006 to be held on Saturday, April 29th at the Nashoba Regional High School in Bolton, MA from 11AM to 5PM. For
VC LAG
2006-02-19 by ithaib
Hi everyone, I m experimenting with my new VC LAG, and the only thing I don t understand is how to use the 3 Up/Down/Up & Down Inputs. They accept Control