Re: [motm] Re: My initial take on the panel discussion
2005-12-03 by Robert van der Kamp
... Module edge separators ... didn t know you guys actually had a name for this. ;) ... Very nice! That s the thing I m after indeed. It doesn t have to be
Messages
Browse messages
Page 168 of 690 · 34488 messages matched
Re: My initial take on the panel discussion
2005-12-03 by mate_stubb
Module edge separators are the single most important addition one could make to the format, in my opinion. It makes a HUGE visibility/useability difference.
Re: [motm] Example of Tyco rape & pillage
2005-12-03 by Paul Haneberg
There is a theory I learned in business school, which I found personally appalling, but I believe it is practiced a lot. You raise the price on a given
Re: [motm] My initial take on the panel discussion OT
2005-12-03 by Paul Haneberg
Hi Tom, I m with you on the pollution issue. At the manufacturing business I own, (which is where we ship both MOTM modules and Stooge Products from,) we
Re: [motm] Example of Tyco rape & pillage
2005-12-03 by Robert van der Kamp
... WHY??? Just because they can? Do they give any (lame, no doubt) excuse? - Robert
Example of Tyco rape & pillage
2005-12-03 by Paul Schreiber
The pointer knob used on the rotary switch for the MOTM-510 WaveWarper has gone from $2.18 @ 50pcs to $4.47. For 1 freakin plastic *KNOB*. I can get a 66Mhz
Re: [motm] Future panel options - everyone please read carefully (long)
2005-12-03 by Larry David
My $0.02: I have a small system now, with plans to gradually grow it. I love the look of the Synthtec panels, but i would still choose MOTM over anything
RE: [motm] My initial take on the panel discussion
2005-12-03 by John Loffink
Regarding module edge visibility, I find that a strong side light in a dimly lit room is very effective for delineating the edges of the modules. It looks
Re: [motm] My initial take on the panel discussion
2005-12-03 by Robert van der Kamp
I really hate the FPE panels. I ve a (lovely) Oakley EFG-Deluxe sitting here among all my MOTM stuff, and can t stop noticing it. The finish of the panel is
Re: [motm] My initial take on the panel discussion
2005-12-03 by Tom Adam
... Well, don t put any reference to stooge on it ;-) No seriously, I don t see any harm in selling - let s call it lesser quality - products to someone
RE: [motm] The poll
2005-12-02 by Dino Leone
I totally agree with Adam here. I too have been increasingly using FPE for making panels for Tony s modules, and also for additional diy projects, mostly 19
RE: [motm] The poll
2005-12-02 by Frank Vanaman
Hi all-- Adam Schabtach s thoughts mirror, to a large extent, my own. I ve got a good number of standard MOTM panels, and Stooge panels which match the MOTM
alternatives to silkscreening?
2005-12-02 by john mahoney
Can the silkscreening ink be applied with a rubber stamp? (And what is that ink, by the way?) I ve considered getting rubber stamps made with the pot knob
RE: [motm] My initial take on the panel discussion
2005-12-02 by Paul Haneberg
The Stooge name stands for quality. We wouldn t want any bad looking panels getting out there. It could damage the vaunted stooge reputation. ... From:
Watch for Larry's sale this weekend
2005-12-02 by mate_stubb
On a completely unrelated note, watch for an announcement this weekend for Larry s modular projects estate sale. These are his unbuilt MOTM kits, unfinished
Re: [motm] My initial take on the panel discussion
2005-12-02 by Tom Adam
... When experimenting I would think that you guys would try to make a real panel. I suggest you try making one of those Neural Agonizer panels. Even if the
RE: [motm] My initial take on the panel discussion
2005-12-02 by Paul Haneberg
The problem with this is that I don t think we can punch a panel after the Polan is applied. We haven t tried it yet, but our tool & die guys here think the
RE: [motm] The poll
2005-12-02 by Adam Schabtach
... My $0.02 worth, in addition to my vote: I m not at all attached to the stock MOTM look. I m the happy owner of several Stooge panels but I switched to
Re: [motm] Re: My initial take on the panel discussion
2005-12-02 by Scott K Warren
Moe, I m sorry, I didn t intend to sound like I was demanding anything, or asking for anything extra for free. By give away artwork I just meant that since
Re: My initial take on the panel discussion
2005-12-02 by mate_stubb
Scott, I m not exactly sure what you are asking for here. Prepainted panels, I understand. When you say give away the artwork , I don t have any fpd artwork
Re: Future Panel Options (also long)
2005-12-02 by edibennardo
... .... I second those and other opinions, after putting together 5 rows with roughly 180 space units i wouldn t love to redesign anything. A price increase
RE: [motm] Re: Future Panel Options (also long)
2005-12-02 by Greg James
Folks, I ve voted for keeping the current standard. One of the benefits that hasn t been mentioned is the ability to buy used modules and know that they will
Re: [motm] Re: Future Panel Options (also long)
2005-12-02 by tom.adam@telenet.be
Don t care how it looks, as long as it sounds good. It s all about the sound no? ToAd
Re: [motm] My initial take on the panel discussion
2005-12-02 by Scott K Warren
Jeff Brown has a great writeup here: http://www.guitarfool.com/Silkscreen.html I ve silk screened pcb layouts, but haven t tried a MOTM panel yet. I m not
Re: [motm] My initial take on the panel discussion
2005-12-02 by Scott K Warren
Me again -- If the Stooges do supply punched Polan panels to Paul S, I hope you ll also offer punched Polan for Stooge Panels and my custom panel designs, even
The poll
2005-12-02 by mate_stubb
Interesting results so far on the poll. Results are all over the place, and there are more wild folks than I would have suspected. Keep those votes coming! Moe
Re: [motm] My initial take on the panel discussion
2005-12-02 by Paul Haneberg
We are in fact trying to find a solution in terms of a way to make panels for Paul S. a few at a time. It is an unreasonable situation for us all to expect
Re: My initial take on the panel discussion
2005-12-02 by mate_stubb
... I agree, I wouldn t suggest it for factory MOTM modules. If somebody really dug the CMS look however, a really streamlined process for custom panels might
**Important info about 2006 Pricing**
2005-12-02 by Paul Schreiber
Beginning in Jan (whenever I get the shopping cart app going), *some* modules will have a *small* price increase. This is due to suppliers raising prices
My initial take on the panel discussion
2005-12-02 by Paul Schreiber
a) I think that the discussion is mainly for continuing the Stooge panels. Production MOTM panels will remain as they are (even as such a pain as they are)
Re: [motm] Future panel options - everyone please read carefully (long)
2005-12-02 by Paul Haneberg
I fully intend to test a variety of options, including powder coated, the present finish and anodized. I suspect that the finish will have the sharpest edges
RE: [motm] Future panel options - everyone please read carefully (long)
2005-12-02 by John Loffink
Is there a way to test laser etching on the powder coated panel? One would think that the detail wouldn t be any worse than silk screening the powder coated
RE: [motm] Re: Future panel options - everyone please read carefully (long)
2005-12-02 by John Loffink
I also have a system with a mix of MOTM, Encore, Stooge, and FPE paneled modules. While I love the authentic look of the traditional Stooge panels, I must
Re: [motm] Future panel options - everyone please read carefully (long)
2005-12-02 by Paul Haneberg
Hi Richard, I would anticipate our panels costing less and having comparable or faster turn around time than FPE. I would expect the laser graphics to be
Re: Future panel options - everyone please read carefully (long)
2005-12-02 by djbrow54
I have a 56 module system made up of MOTM, Stooge, FrontPanelExpress, and others such as Encore and the new Blacet MOTM style. My issue with the
Re: [motm] Future panel options - everyone please read carefully (long)
2005-12-02 by Richard Brewster
I m one of those who has a mix of MOTM, Stooge, and FPE panels. I like the close match to MOTM of the classic Stooge panels, but I tolerate FPE, which I have
Re: [motm] Re: Future Panel Options (also long)
2005-12-02 by mcb, inc.
... I don t think I can vote because I have two completely contradictory reactions to this possibility. The first is a traditionalist s reaction to the loss
Re: [motm] Future panel options - everyone please read carefully (long)
2005-12-02 by Scott K Warren
Hi, I appreciate that Moe s post is in the spirit of stimulating discussion and I respect that different people may have different views, and that the Stooges
Re: Future Panel Options--one off prototype panels
2005-12-02 by crmatt99
Just my thoughts, I would like to see the MOTM style be the standard from synthtech and somehow still be available for DIY. Maybe the standard could be ordered
Re: Future Panel Options - one off prototyping
2005-12-02 by paulhaneberg
I ll look into this. The problem with milling is that you cannot make a sharp corner like you would need for a square or rectangular hole. For that you need a
Re: [motm] New poll for motm
2005-12-02 by eiii@aol.com
... Ernie Steck......out of the loop for a few years.........
RE: [motm] Re: Future Panel Options--one off prototype panels
2005-12-02 by don relyea
I am no panel expert nor am I machine fabrication expert but I think you can design and computer cut your own panels out of all sorts of materials from this
Re: Future panel options - everyone please read carefully (long)
2005-12-02 by mate_stubb
We re looking at a capacity to handle panels which are full rack mount width, and 7 to 8 rack spaces tall. Moe http://www.hotrodmotm.com
Re: Future Panel Options (also long)
2005-12-01 by mate_stubb
BTW, if you change your mind during this discussion, you can go back and change your vote any time before the poll closes. Moe
Re: Future Panel Options (also long)
2005-12-01 by paulhaneberg
Hi all, I wanted to elaborate on what Dave has just posted. First, let me reiterate what Dave has said about Paul S. Do not hassle him about a possible change
RE: [motm] Future panel options - everyone please read carefully (long)
2005-12-01 by Dave Halliday
This is of interest to me too... I am putting together three ASM-1 boards and have been thinking about moving two Oberheim SEMs and the sequencer out of a very
Re: [motm] Future panel options - everyone please read carefully (long)
2005-12-01 by Wood
O.K So I voted prior to reading the post. I think this would be a good idea at those kind of prices. Would I have to drill them myself though? I have been
Future panel options - everyone please read carefully (long)
2005-12-01 by mate_stubb
All, This is potentially a controversial topic, so please read carefully, and don t read anything into it other than what I actually say! I want to have a
New poll for motm
2005-12-01 by motm@yahoogroups.com
Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the motm group: Which best describes your level of interest in new MOTM panel finishes, whether or not
re: John Simonton
2005-11-30 by Robair, Gino
FYI: ******** PAiA Electronics, Inc. 3200 Teakwood Ln. Edmond, OK 73013 USA www.paia.com Founder and president of PAiA Electronics