Re: delay's digital......
2003-10-29 by Roger Rossen
I know of at least 2 MOTM customers that have PhDs in DSP....so guys....? from: Paul S. Darn - my PhDs are in PMS and DUIs...been way too overstudied in
Messages
Browse messages
Page 269 of 690 · 34488 messages matched
Re: [motm] delay's digital......
2003-10-29 by Mike Estee
... This would be a wonderful addition to the MOTM line, I hereby promise to buy at least one, maybe two ^_^ --mikes
Re: [motm] delay's digital......
2003-10-29 by Paul Schreiber
My thought at this point is: if somebody out there wants to design and write the code on a DSP eval baord, I ll be more than happy to license the design and
delay's digital......
2003-10-29 by Markk W. Roberts
I guess I m spoiled, as I have a Eventide DSP7000 and a tc electronic M3000, both fully programmable in real-time (over MIDI). It s also a matter of economics:
Re: [motm] Suggestion for MOTM Web site
2003-10-29 by Adam Schabtach
... That was exactly the issue that turned me off Serge as a format, despite falling in love with a friend s large Serge system and then getting a personal
MTA PS conn. question
2003-10-29 by Roger Rossen
Hello all, was wanting to jump in on last nights topic - very intersting indeed! However, the 2 Tylenol PMs I took would make you very happy that I didn t even
shipping delay
2003-10-29 by J. Larry Hendry
Stuff that was supposed to ship this week has not. Day gig is keeping me from the post office this week. Everything should go out on Saturday or Monday of
Re: [motm] 3rd parties?
2003-10-29 by Mike Estee
... This would be the crazy part of crazy talk ;) At least amongst the small group of people who I ve shown the MOTM to, they pretty much universally agree
Re: [motm] Re: Suggestion for MOTM Web site
2003-10-29 by Mike Estee
... You ve got some good points there. The lack of an enclosure (not rack, but enclosure, to be put into a rack) Kinda bugs me. I d really like a nice aluminum
Re: [motm] 3rd parties?
2003-10-29 by The Old Crow
Two years in development. ;) Original prototype was built 2 years ago. Of course, it was tweaked a lot in those 2 years... Crow
Re: [motm] Serge semi-rant
2003-10-29 by J. Larry Hendry
... Sigh.......
Re: [motm] 3rd parties?
2003-10-29 by Paul Schreiber
... My point was: history has shown (in a VERY dramatic way) that trying to claim ownership of a de facto standard is not viewed favorably. You are better
My last "Serge" post for the evening...
2003-10-29 by Les Mizzell
By the way, if you want to hear a Serge... Get Hell s Canyon http://www.hypnos.com/Merchant2/merchant.mv This is free form electronic. Several tracks were
RE: [motm] Serge semi-rant
2003-10-29 by Frank Vanaman
Hi all-- ... At one time I d considered commissioning an Animal Panel myself, but a look at the prices made me reconsider! I always thought of the early
Re: [motm] Suggestion for MOTM Web site
2003-10-29 by Les Mizzell
... This has been discussed ad-nauseum on the Serge list, and directly with Rex as well. He has absolutely no interest in selling individual modules or kits or
3rd parties - from the horses mouth
2003-10-29 by J. Larry Hendry
Sorry, I m long winded tonight. ... others muscled in , Like most things in life, it is a 2-edged sword. I can take several issues about Stooge or other
Re: [motm] Suggestion for MOTM Web site
2003-10-29 by Richard Brewster
Yes. In the late 70 s I assembled some Serge machines for people. Back then you could order a set of modules in kit form. The boards came pre-assembled.
Re: Suggestion for MOTM Web site
2003-10-29 by konkuro
... smart business decision to be advertising your competition. True, Paul s lineup has some large holes, and this page probably would only cover modules that
MOTM website & Delays )of the processing kind
2003-10-28 by Roger Rossen
I still think the MOTM format needs a really good delay. Delay is crucial for making many interesting sounds. from Mike Man -I can t agree more on this!
Re: [motm] 3rd parties?
2003-10-28 by Mike Estee
... True, true. There are some other lessons to learned from that analogy as well. It could easily be argued that IBM lost that war a long time ago. Intel s
3rd parties?
2003-10-28 by Paul Schreiber
Well, it is a 2-edged sword. IBM invented the PC format, paniced when others muscled in , and anyone remember Microchannel and the TopView OS (snicker). How
Re: [motm] Suggestion for MOTM Web site
2003-10-28 by The Old Crow
And Paia. And..was Serge doing modules in the late 70s? Crow
Re: [motm] Suggestion for MOTM Web site
2003-10-28 by Mike Estee
... Touché ^_^ --mikes
Re: [motm] 3rd parties?
2003-10-28 by Robert van der Kamp
... Err, that ARP filter? ;P - Robert
Re: [motm] Suggestion for MOTM Web site
2003-10-28 by Mike Estee
... And a serious deal killer to buying the harder to get MOTM equivalent. I don t mean to sound callous, but that doesn t sound like a very smart business
Re: [motm] Suggestion for MOTM Web site
2003-10-28 by Paul Schreiber
In fact: over the break I plan to go over the website. Any other suggestions welcome! Paul S.
Suggestion for MOTM Web site
2003-10-28 by konkuro
We all know that the Stooges offer modules from other manufacturers as well as some original modules in MOTM format. But can anybody name off the top of their
Re: [motm] Testing your studio
2003-10-28 by Mike Estee
... I too am considering them, the physics make more sense to me than auralex foam. Auralex seems to work great for high frequency reflections, but it doesn t
Re: MOTM workshop in Norway
2003-10-28 by konkuro
...
Re: [motm] Halloween Pieces (attn Les Mizzell)
2003-10-28 by elhardt@att.net
OK, I worked my ass off and did my Halloween piece for Les Mizzell s contest or public mp3 collection. I believe now is just about the deadline, yet I see no
Cable price change - invoices starting
2003-10-28 by J. Larry Hendry
Don t you just hate it when the price of something you want goes up? Well, GOOD news on the Stooge front. There is no change in the 3.5 mm to 3.5 mm cable.
Re: [motm] Testing your studio
2003-10-28 by alt-mode
... One thing I noticed is that the moderator for recording.org is the founder of RealTraps.com. I don t know if there is a conflict there or not but at least
Re: [motm] Re: MOTM format ARP 2600 filter?
2003-10-28 by Mike Estee
... Especially when applied to synth modules! ^_^ (I always thought CD Quality meant sounds bad. ) --mikes
Re: [motm] Re: MOTM format ARP 2600 filter?
2003-10-28 by Neil Bradley
... Lots of other terms that have become meaningless: RISC Digital Ready (speakers) 64 bit CPU 32 bit CPU Wi-Fi And a myriad of others... -- Neil ... Neil
Re: [motm] Re: MOTM format ARP 2600 filter?
2003-10-28 by jhaible
Not really on topic, but maybe amusing: In Germany we had a big advertising for BASF compact cassettes in the last days before Minidisc, and finally CDRs, took
Re: [motm] Re: MOTM format ARP 2600 filter?
2003-10-28 by The Old Crow
I just think Paul wanted to avoid saying something like 96dB dynamic range, which is far less marketable to the same audience of prospective buyers. (eg, the
Re: Testing your studio
2003-10-28 by ivancu@aol.com
FFT measurements such as those provided by SmaartLive provide much more meaningful data than an RTA. Traditional Real Time Analysis shows a buildup of
Re: [motm] Re: MOTM format ARP 2600 filter?
2003-10-28 by Adam Schabtach
... Well, yes. Given the extremely wide range of quality of recordings pressed on CDs that I have heard, IMHO the term CD quality has very little meaning. It
MOTM workshop in Norway
2003-10-27 by Paul Schreiber
Pictures of last weekend s analog synth workshop in Trondheim, Norway featuring building a small MOTM synth in 3 days:
Master-Debatable
2003-10-27 by Roger Rossen
Here we go again - the Great D vs. A debate! Makes the since the beginning of time Battle-of-the-Sexes look mundane. (well - ok, not really...) Just hoping
Re: MOTM format ARP 2600 filter?
2003-10-27 by konkuro
... quality are not mutually exclusive. Many people make CDs of noisy equipment. Is a recording of a Buchla system automatically not CD quality ? Or of an
Re: Testing your studio
2003-10-27 by rreprobate
Real Traps are highly recommended. They sell panel resonators that are literally just 2x3s, ply, and some owens corning rigid fiberglass. Stuff works wonders.
Re: [motm] Testing your studio
2003-10-27 by Mike Estee
... What did you end up using? I ve been looking at MiniTraps from RealTraps. The seem to have gotten decent reviews. If anyone has had positive or negetive
RE: [motm] Testing your studio
2003-10-27 by Chris Walcott
Another thing to check out is the recording.org forum on acoustics. One thing I learned is that no amount of foam is going to work as a bass trap (and I wish
Random Thoughts
2003-10-27 by Roger Rossen
That ll be, what, three of you? Thanks for reading this! - From: Chub-different, and built to stay that way! hey - I d be one of those three! I, for some
OT - FS: some non-MOTM stuff
2003-10-27 by Eric Frampton
I m raising funds for new modules from Paul, upgrading some gear, and doing some housecleaning... Bryston 2B-LP Pro amplifier, $500 with manual Ensoniq Fizmo
CV without predictability...
2003-10-27 by osthelder
Hi all! After spending quite a few hours playing with various (psuedo)random control voltage generator schemes, it seems I ve hit on something useful. Well,
Re: MOTM format ARP 2600 filter?
2003-10-27 by strohs56k
... This sounds like a good idea to me (a really high quality, 4 pole high pass as a companion to the 440.) I guess I need to two of these - to go along with
Re: Testing Your Studio
2003-10-27 by paulhaneberg
One other point relating to what Roger just posted. If you monitor at a level of 80-85 db you will find that your perception of loudness as well as pitch is
Re: Testing Your Studio
2003-10-27 by paulhaneberg
I used a similar method for determining the proper frequency for bass traps in my control room. I recorded a series of sine waves into ProTools at different