Re: [motm] Fw: Sequenced parts
2000-12-19 by bigd@buffalo.com
This device sounds like something Ray Scott might of used to make music LOL : ) Jim
Messages
Browse messages
Page 511 of 690 · 34488 messages matched
Re: [motm] Fw: Sequenced parts
2000-12-19 by Dave Hylander
Wow, that would be great. My over forty eyes would great appreciate the help!! Dave
Fw: Sequenced parts
2000-12-19 by Paul Schreiber
Resending this. I can t tell if it went or not! Maybe eGroups is down. Paul S. ... a ... for ... the ... per ... pay
Re: [motm] help: Fostex R-8 multitrack broken
2000-12-19 by elhardt@aol.com
... motor anymore, and turning it manually makes rattling noises. When I hit the Play or FFWD button, a motor starts inside, and there are more rattling
Re: [motm] Re: MOTM-910 1U mult (pricing?)
2000-12-19 by elhardt@aol.com
... price went from $89 to $99. Yep, I m just *rolling* in the dough!
Sequenced parts
2000-12-19 by Paul Schreiber
It dawned on me today that my pcb assembler has an old part sequencer. NOT a music sequencer! What this does is
Re: [motm] help: Fostex R-8 multitrack broken
2000-12-19 by weather
... nope, but when stuff like this happens to tape machines, i m usually forced to take the back off and look for stuff that s come unhooked, ie springs /
help: Fostex R-8 multitrack broken
2000-12-18 by jhaible@t-online.de
In the midst of a recording session, my Fostex R-8 has left me. The right reel (which is filled during Play and FFWD) is not driven by the motor anymore, and
Re: [motm] Future Module Widths
2000-12-18 by Doug F
Will there ever be more than 2U wide modules coming out? Just curious. Doug F
Re: [motm] Future Module Widths
2000-12-18 by Paul Schreiber
... The Preamp is 1U, maybe the Delayed Vibrato. All others are 2U wide. The MOTM-310 uVCO is also 1U wide. I may sneak it in there somewhere, as the
Re: [motm] MOTM 420
2000-12-18 by improv@peak.org
... Yeah, Paul, I d never noticed the New Jersey accent before... ... ____________________________________________ Dave Trenkel : improv@peak.org Minus Web
RE: [motm] And the winner is.....
2000-12-18 by David Bivins
Good thinking on the NYC MOTM group--perhaps even a bit earlier. Certainly *after* the holidays madness though. It ll be great to get the gang back together!
RE: [motm] NAMM, anyone?
2000-12-18 by David Bivins
... Cause when you re dead and buried with embalmed arteries clogged with gunk, I ll still be merrily patching my MOTM. And if your survivors post details of
RE: [motm] Future Module Widths
2000-12-18 by Brousseau, Paul E (Paul)
One of the modules is a pre-amp. ;) As for gain / invert, maybe this is on the mixer? I d wager that all except possible the mixer are 2U. I d think the
Re: [motm] MOTM 420
2000-12-18 by Doug F
Jim, Yeah, MS10 s are great synths. The 420 does a great job of emulation, but the res is not quite as gritty and doesn t quite self oscillate like the 10 s
Metal Fab Update?
2000-12-18 by alt-mode
Paul, What s the latest on the Flat Rails and the rack end-pieces? Thanks, Eric __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo!
Re: [motm] Future Module Widths
2000-12-18 by bigd@buffalo.com
Just and FYI: I would hope Paul would include a accessory module: gain , invert, preamp, etc. Just so we dont have to get some of the other junk being sold out
Future Module Widths
2000-12-18 by CHRIS PARKER
Question: OK, we know from recent past threads that the release schedule is as follows: 1. MOTM-101 2. Mixer 3. Dual VCA 4. VC Pulse Divider 5. Delayed
Re: [motm] MOTM 420
2000-12-18 by bigd@buffalo.com
too much red meat in diet! LOL : ) jim
Re: [motm] MOTM 420
2000-12-18 by Paul Schreiber
What the hell did I just type! Sheesh!! Paul S. ... From: Paul Schreiber To: Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 3:27 PM
RE: [motm] MOTM 420
2000-12-18 by Brousseau, Paul E (Paul)
Been hitting the egg-nog a little hard, have we? ;) --PBr
Re: [motm] MOTM 420
2000-12-18 by Paul Schreiber
Since no one is *answering the question*, I will. Yes, you will get MS-10 spounds out od a MOTM-420. Paul S. ... From: Tkacs, Ken To:
Re: [motm] CS-60 future MOTM filter?
2000-12-18 by jhaible@t-online.de
The CS-synthesizer mystery - what is responsible for that smooth sound ? (;- ). I ve been thinking about the CS-60 filter quite some time now. My *temporary*
CS-60 future MOTM filter?
2000-12-18 by perpetual@uswest.net
got my cs-60 on friday and man do i love it. it was three hours before i even remembered it had a filter input. so, as with everything, i pulled out my
MOTM 420
2000-12-18 by bigd@buffalo.com
So i was ovver a friends yesterday, i he almost blew my head off showing me his Korg MS-10. I was astounded. Made me wonder if Ill be able get a similiar
RE: [motm] MOTM 420
2000-12-18 by Tkacs, Ken
That was my first ever synthesizer. I still love that thing. It s a tank, too. ... From: bigd@buffalo.com [mailto:bigd@buffalo.com] Sent: Monday, 18 December,
Re: [motm] Re: MOTM-910 1U mult (pricing?)
2000-12-18 by Paul Schreiber
The labor on the 910 was $7.50 *higher* than I estimated. That s why the price went from $89 to $99. Yep, I m just *rolling* in the dough! At least it s not
Re: [motm] Longshot idea..
2000-12-18 by Doug F
I ve asked Paul before if he d consider doing a sort of MS10 type patchable monosynth. I d love to be able to replace my MS10 for live use with a Synthtech
Re: Patch Documentation Query
2000-12-18 by skin job
Something I did was go to the synthtech website, copied the jpegs of the modules, and pasted them into Microsuck Publisher (although any image editing program
Re: MOTM-910 1U mult (pricing?)
2000-12-18 by elhardt@aol.com
... I don t want to sound ungrateful now that a 1U multiple is finally coming available (and a nice design at that), but is it just me or is the pricing on
Re: [motm] Death of a Serge
2000-12-18 by jwbarlow@aol.com
... I hope that all goes well with RP. I m disappointed to hear of your experiences with some panels, I know Rex had some people doing assembly work for him,
Re: [motm] Longshot idea..
2000-12-18 by ivancu@aol.com
In a message dated 12/17/00 6:31:17 PM, revtor@aol.com writes:
Longshot idea..
2000-12-18 by Steve Maietta
Paul, Here s a longshot idea for you.. (as if MOTM wasn t enough work for you) ever consider a 3 or so rack space (or table top) monophonic synth unit?
And the winner is.....
2000-12-18 by Steve Maietta
Oh and guys, in case you re wondering if I was qualified as being high enough on the Steak food chain to have won the feee module.., I think that I m pretty
Re: Fw: Death of a Serge
2000-12-17 by Dave Fulton
I can t tell you about Rex & his pilgramage and I know this may be hard ,you might just have to send it a really good tech. Someone who will take the time to
And the winner is..
2000-12-17 by revtor@aol.com
Wow that s grrrrreat news!!! thanks so much Santa, I mean Paul... I will rock the MOTM hat with pride!!! But now I have to get some more rack rails!!!!! Boy,
Fw: Death of a Serge
2000-12-17 by J. Larry Hendry
For those of you who do not subscribe to AH or Synth DIY, I thought this was interesting. Just one more reasons to buy from someone willing to supply
Re: [motm] Connector survey
2000-12-17 by Dave Hylander
I think it s more like 26 if you use the average module requirement of 20 ma and Paul s safety factor of not using more than 65% to keep power supply heat
Re: [motm] Connector survey
2000-12-17 by jwbarlow@aol.com
... I think Paul B has the right idea, base the number on the PSU current capabilities and the average module consumption. I also agree that it might be nice
Re: [motm] Connector survey
2000-12-17 by Dave Hylander
I haven t had any problems with 2 900 s powering separate cases. -dave-
Re: [motm] Connector survey
2000-12-17 by Jeffrey Pontius
... I suppose it depends on how big the ass of your case is. I doing some sketching out of modules in cases using the current line and the proposed line of
Re: [motm] Connector survey
2000-12-17 by Dave Hylander
Paul, I would think that using 16, 18, or 20 with the ability to serial chain the boards, would extend the 900 past it s capacity, or would give you a single
Re: [motm] Connector survey
2000-12-17 by weather
From: Paul Schreiber ... I am ... hello all, i think there s an optimum number which is the theoretical maximum number of modules which
Re: [motm] NEW Meaty MOTM Patch possibilities??? (OT)
2000-12-17 by weather
From: thomas white ... i hope you cleaned that floor sonny... anyway, what about the attenuation possibilities presented by those
Re: [motm] NEW Meaty MOTM Patch possibilities??? (OT)
2000-12-17 by Al Wagner
I bet it ll really fatten up your sound! Maybe a little seasoning could also spice up your sound! Hmm, I wonder, can your 1/4 cables handle the extra
Protos all gone
2000-12-17 by Paul Schreiber
OK they are all spoken for! I ll send them out next week sometime. They make nice paperweights. Paul S.
Re: [motm] OT: Wouldn't you like to be a Pepper too?
2000-12-17 by Paul Schreiber
You didn t miss much. The Dublin, TX DPs are horribly sweet. They are for folks that like to put 2 cups of sugar in a glass of tea, with a 1 inch layer of
new noise...
2000-12-17 by doc pendergast
h3y all, if n any of you are interested, i have a new song up usin mostly a motm and a beatbox. it features Shri Atal Bihari Vajpayee. the link is:
About the MOTM prototypes...
2000-12-17 by Paul Schreiber
Just so you know what you are getting a) they are not pc boards. They are on perf board. b) I have no idea if they still work. They did at one time :) c) Most
Re: Connector survey
2000-12-17 by doc pendergast
i ll be buildin a modular desk with stackable cabs in a couple of months. it s lookin like it ll be 20U across. so 20 gets my vote, though 18 d work for