Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Thread

Re: [motm] Panel Ideas (long - sorry)

Re: [motm] Panel Ideas (long - sorry)

2002-01-31 by J. Larry Hendry

----- Original Message -----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: thomas white <djthomaswhite@...>
Schaeffer is an option but the quality of those guys
verses our precious stooges two garage factory is
meager at best.

---- Larry Hendry writes:
Actually, I have seen some absolutely beautiful photos of panels from
Schaeffer.  I think most of JH custom panels come from there, but I will
have to let him confirm / deny that.   On most of the panels I see
photographed at Oakley, there are no tick marks, which seems too "plain" for
me.  I believe when you start adding those, the cost goes up quite a bit.

As far as other panels like the Blacet mixer for example, making that
available for general consumption just does not make sense.  When we
originally made the Oakley mixer, there was no MOTM mixer.  Now there is one
and will be 2 when the micro-mixer comes out.  Still, the Oakley mixer makes
such a handy package for 3 separate reversing attenuators. With 3 mixers
already in the MOTM format, will another 2U that requires extensive
off-board pot mounting to convert from the original format actually sell?

Now, I own the Blacet mixer.  I wanted a mixer before I ever heard of Oakley
and the Blacet mixer looked good.  In fact, the Blacet mixer is a very nice
mixer with built in controls for bias and LEDs to monitor if you have
offset.  I have a MOTM protoboard DIY mixer which was mostly modeled after
the Blacet mixer, but incorporated the changes I wanted. So, not making the
panel really has little to do with the mixer and more to do with marketing
the panel.

The Blacet Frequency divider is also in my rack.  This is a module that I
love / hate (sorry John). It is more of a pulse divider than it is an audio
tool.  Which of course, makes it a cool compliment to the MOTM-120 which is
really the other way around.  I made several modifications to mine.  If I
were to build it again, I would make more.  The output is pulsed DC and not
AC.  So, if you want to use it for audio, you should really offset the
output back to crossing zero.  I would ditch the hex output buffer and put
in some op amps for output buffering with a switch that would select them
all to either (0-10v DC or +/- 5v AC).

Anyhow, it is an interesting module I bought because of the divide by 1.5
and divide by 3 functions.  However, I am now eagerly awaiting the arrival
of the MOTM VC divider module.

As far as panel fronts, Dave and I can make a one-off for any design.  The
issue is simply cost.  The 2U panel I can sell for $23 is closer to $60 when
I only make one because the fixed cost are all dumped on one module instead
of spread across 20 like the pricing model we use for the ones we will sell
many of.  And, that does not include us doing the artwork.  That other
stooge refuses to work for free and actually wants to charge for his time to
do layout work for one-offs.  Go figure. <snicker>

So, if someone has their heart set on a particular panel, e-mail me
privately and we can make you one.  But, you won't care for the price I am
afraid.  We make almost nothing on a single panels like this, but simply
pass along the significant cost of starting a new design that we are charged
from the screening/ printing person.

Now, I actually have both my Frequency Divider and Blacet mixer on MOTM
style panels in my rack.  I did them using Ken Tkacs excellent printed paper
splattered lacquer method.  I have actually had people touch them and not
realize they were not printed metal.  I made one mistake that caused the
paper to buckle that was caused by having to use holes through the front of
the panel for mounting the bracket.  Now that I have Stooge brackets, I
could re-do it perfectly.  I think this is a cheap option for one offs.
But, if your wallet is fat, you can have the official Stooge version of
almost anything that you want.

It might surprise some Stooge panel buyers to know that we have made quite a
few panels that you have never seen for that were made for DIY designs.  In
fact, that was the initial purpose of Stooge panels.  On the next run, based
on my e-mail, almost all of the new designs will be DIY panels for people
who have their own circuits.  Eventually, those that are appropriate may
work their way into the public domain.

Anyhow, here are photos of my Blacet Mixer and Frequency Divider.
http://www.wiseguysynth.com/larry/misc/mix.jpg
http://www.wiseguysynth.com/larry/misc/fd.jpg

The photos are not that good as they were taken long before I got my digital
camera.  Aside from the paper coming lose around the bracket holding screw
holes, they look great.  With what I learned doing these two, I am certain I
will do much better next time.  I cannot take credit for the idea or the
layout.  Ken Tkacs is the guy who taught me how to do this.  He has some
details about how to do it at his website:
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/KenTkacs/mainProjectsModular.htm

These were printed on a regular laser printer. Ken tell me he gets similar
results on a ink jet.

OK, long enough.
Larry

Re: [motm] Panel Ideas (long - sorry)

2002-01-31 by CHRIS PARKER

... From: Larry Hendry  ... issue is simply cost.  The 2U panel I can sell for $23 is closer to $60 when I only make one because the fixed

RE: [motm] Kenton breakout panel (was Panel Ideas)

2002-01-31 by Alan Wagner


>
>>>Chris Parker writes:
>

OK, since we're talking about the next panel run, I've been wondering if there was any kind of demand for a passive breakout panel for the Kenton Pro-2000 MIDI-to-CV? I know the stooges have already designed a great panel for the Encore Expressionist and, since Paul S. highly recommends the Kenton products, I was wondering how many other MOTMers are like me and use the Kenton.

I'm currently using a homebuilt 1U high x 19" wide panel to bring my Pro-2000's outputs "around to the front";. This is a strictly passive panel with no circuitry involved and it sits in a separate rack because it just doesn't fit in with the rest of my modules. I've toyed with the idea of creating something similar to Dave and Larry's Expressionist panel...in other words, a 2U wide MOTM-format panel that would integrate well with the rest of my modular. I have attached a crude bitmap image of what I have been envisioning (please excuse the low resolution; I wasn't sure if a larger image would make it through the "yahoo groups censors".)

Is anyone else interested in this? If so, we might be able to take advantage of the economies of scale Larry talked about. Perhaps the Stooges have already designed one of these as a one-off and would be willing to add them to the next run???

Just my $0.02.

-Chris-


Reply:

I’ve thought of this too. I like the idea of having all the Kenton outputs right there in my MOTM rack. The down side is that it would take up 2U of space that could be used for another module.

Larry has previously posted a picture that shows the Kenton outputs mounted on the rack ears to bring them to the front. This idea makes use of existing space.

I haven’t done either one yet because frankly I’m undecided on which way I want to go. I am leaning toward the rack ear idea for two reasons. First space is a premium in my setup. Second I didn’t want to purchase $$$ a blank panel for this because my homebrew panel graphics suck so it would not compliment my MOTM modules.

However, if someone were to do a panel run I could be persuaded to go the breakout panel route!

Another $0.02

Tx

Al

Re: [motm] Kenton breakout panel (was Panel Ideas)

2002-01-31 by J. Larry Hendry

How about something hybrid?  Use the rack ears for the 4 DIN jacks.  Then
make a 1U Stooge panel with all the 1/4" stuff you want.  Make use of
existing space.  Takes up only 1U of module space.

Larry
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message -----
From: Alan Wagner
I\ufffdve thought of this too.  I like the idea of having all the Kenton outputs
right there in my MOTM rack. The down side is that it would take up 2U of
space that could be used for another module.

Larry has previously posted a picture that shows the Kenton outputs mounted
on the rack ears to bring them to the front. This idea makes use of existing
space.

I haven\ufffdt done either one yet because frankly I\ufffdm undecided on which way I
want to go. I am leaning toward the rack ear idea for two reasons. First
space is a premium in my setup. Second I didn\ufffdt want to purchase $$$ a blank
panel for this because my homebrew panel graphics suck so it would not
compliment my MOTM modules.

However, if someone were to do a panel run I could be persuaded to go the
breakout panel route!

Another $0.02

Tx
Al



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor





Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

RE: [motm] Kenton breakout panel (was Panel Ideas)

2002-02-01 by Alan Wagner

Hi Larry,
That makes more sense!

Maybe something along the lines of this in a 1U;

Gate A     CV A
Gate B     CV B
Aux 1       Aux 2
Aux 3       Aux 4
Aux 5       Aux 6
Clock
Mult---------Mult
  [               ]
Mult---------Mult

(OK, so you have to use your imagination <g>)

Al
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: J. Larry Hendry [mailto:jlarryh@...]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:21 PM
To: MOTM List
Subject: Re: [motm] Kenton breakout panel (was Panel Ideas)

How about something hybrid?  Use the rack ears for the 4 DIN jacks.  Then
make a 1U Stooge panel with all the 1/4" stuff you want.  Make use of
existing space.  Takes up only 1U of module space.

Larry

----- Original Message -----
From: Alan Wagner
I've thought of this too.  I like the idea of having all the Kenton outputs
right there in my MOTM rack. The down side is that it would take up 2U of
space that could be used for another module.

Larry has previously posted a picture that shows the Kenton outputs mounted
on the rack ears to bring them to the front. This idea makes use of existing
space.

I haven't done either one yet because frankly I'm undecided on which way I
want to go. I am leaning toward the rack ear idea for two reasons. First
space is a premium in my setup. Second I didn't want to purchase $$$ a blank
panel for this because my homebrew panel graphics suck so it would not
compliment my MOTM modules.

However, if someone were to do a panel run I could be persuaded to go the
breakout panel route!

Another $0.02

Tx
Al



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor





Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.





Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.