MOTM

Comments?

It's a little tight in the labelling department, but this is the general idea.

Paul S.

A couple of comments/questions:

1) There are two VCAs but they can only be controlled together, 
correct?  I mean if you flip the switch to RM, then both will be RM 
and if you change the GAIN knob it affects both VCAs?  Or is one VCA 
RM-able and the other exponential?  Still, GAIN and CV MOD affect 
both equally, no?

2) What about push/pull switches on the pots instead of toggles?

Mike

--- In motm@y..., "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@a...> wrote:
> Comments?
> 
> It's a little tight in the labelling department, but this is the 
general idea.
> 
> Paul S.

Looks great to me but a full description of the features would be handy to 
figure out exact uses and design quirks. Any help in this area? Boy this 
will really help my polyphony plan out big time. Thanks and I look forward 
to the feature run down.

Thomas White


>From: "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...>
>To: "MOTM listserv" <motm@yahoogroups.com>
>Subject: [motm] MOTM-190 Mock-up
>Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 12:49:18 -0500
>
>Comments?
>
>It's a little tight in the labelling department, but this is the general 
>idea.
>
>Paul S.
>
><< m190.jpg >>




_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: 
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx

> It's a little tight in the labelling department, but this is the general
idea.

hello all,
couldn't the switches go below the three pots, imho they'd sit a little more
comfortable there

cheers
paul b

I perfectly agree, the switches below the pots might be better looking
if this is phisically possible.


Enrico Italy





--- In motm@y..., <vulture.squadron@s...> wrote:

> > It's a little tight in the labelling department, but this is the general
> idea.
> 
> hello all,
> couldn't the switches go below the three pots, imho they'd sit a little more
> comfortable there
> 
> cheers
> paul b