MOTM

I agree, something more along the lines of this suggestion would be helpful.
 
I also agree with the desire to put the switches under the pot column,
unless that's physically impossible. If they switched sideways instead of up
and down, would everyone freak out? You could at least fit one down there
that way.

-----Original Message-----
From: John Loffink [mailto:jloffink@...] 


 
Top knob:
0 position = IN
5 position = AM
10 position = RM/CV1
 
Second Knob label = GAIN2
 
Third Knob label = CV2 MOD

Or make it 2u and add three more features (tee-hee!).

-----Original Message-----
From: groovyshaman@... [mailto:groovyshaman@...] 


I like this labelling better.

Ah, don't shoot me, but maybe this would look cleaner in 2U.  I know, I
know, this is 'supposed' to be a uModule... it's just that with the
indefinite delay of the 2U 130 and the disco'd 2U 110, a 'relaxed-fit' 2U
VCA would be nice. <grimace>

George

----- Original Message -----
From: John Loffink


Top knob:
0 position = IN
5 position = AM
10 position = RM/CV1

Second Knob label = GAIN2

Third Knob label = CV2 MOD
John Loffink
jloffink@...

Another thread on interface design, so I can't resist sticking my 
nose into your business, but why was the choice made to avoid 
convention in placing CV / IN / OUT jacks on MOTM modules?  

I guess I'm partial to the idea of having CV inputs near the bottom, 
audio inputs on the left and outputs on the right, ala Moog.  I'd 
expect the layout to conform to a flow from left to right, at least 
intra-module.  But with MOTM modules, the arrangement appears 
random.  

Am I missing something?

Trying not to be too annoying,
Roger