MOTM

Well, I drew it up like Paul wanted it, but this would be my vote:

Channels are vertical rows, channel 1 to the left and channel 4 to 
the right, thus matching the LED indicators above.

From bottom to top, CV, GATE, VEL, AUX.

Moe

I agree with Moe on the vertical layout; it makes more sense if you 
chain several of these units together. Although, I prefer GATE on the 
bottom.

If I vote, does this mean I commit to buying one?

At 3:01 PM +0000 2002/12/10, mate_stubb <mate_stubb@...> wrote:

>Well, I drew it up like Paul wanted it, but this would be my vote:
>
>Channels are vertical rows, channel 1 to the left and channel 4 to
>the right, thus matching the LED indicators above.
>
>From bottom to top, CV, GATE, VEL, AUX.
>
>Moe

I agree with Moe on the vertical layout; it makes more sense once you 
chain several of these units together. Although, I prefer GATE on the 
bottom. Too bad those nice blue buttons (like on the 650) won't fit, 
that's a real blemish.

If I vote, does this mean I commit to buying one?

At 3:01 PM +0000 2002/12/10, mate_stubb <mate_stubb@...> wrote:

>Well, I drew it up like Paul wanted it, but this would be my vote:
>
>Channels are vertical rows, channel 1 to the left and channel 4 to
>the right, thus matching the LED indicators above.
>
>From bottom to top, CV, GATE, VEL, AUX.
>
>Moe

I vote for Moe's Rows as well.
I've ordered two.  Do I get two votes?  :)

> 
> If I vote, does this mean I commit to buying one?
> 
> 

Of course............................not.

Paul S.

J. Larry Hendry wrote:


> No, but your vote is subject to certain calculations:
>
> Your vote *(number of 650s currently on order, substitute 0.1 if none on
> order) * (number of MOTM modules you own now) * (0.5 * number of modules
on
> back order) * (72 - your current age {to determine the number of modules
you
> are likely to buy in the future}) , then multiplied by general disposable
> income (submit last 3 years tax returns for verification).
>
> Clear?  :)
> Larry (using excess vacation from work, and generally wasting time)

<WiseA@@Mode On>
Aw, don't listen to him, that part about current age is a bunch of crap -
otherwise his own vote wouldn't mean much.
</WAM>
Besides, I would argue that since you "can't take it with you", you might as
well spend it on MOTM.

Heh.. <ducking..>

George

----- Original Message -----

From: Scott Juskiw <scott@...>
If I vote, does this mean I commit to buying one?

No, but your vote is subject to certain calculations:

Your vote *(number of 650s currently on order, substitute 0.1 if none on
order) * (number of MOTM modules you own now) * (0.5 * number of modules on
back order) * (72 - your current age {to determine the number of modules you
are likely to buy in the future}) , then multiplied by general disposable
income (submit last 3 years tax returns for verification).

Clear?  :)
Larry (using excess vacation from work, and generally wasting time)

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "mate_stubb <mate_stubb@y...>" 
<mate_stubb@y...> wrote:
> Well, I drew it up like Paul wanted it, but this would be my vote:
> 
> Channels are vertical rows, channel 1 to the left and channel 4 to 
> the right, thus matching the LED indicators above.
> 
> From bottom to top, CV, GATE, VEL, AUX.
> 
> Moe

I vote for Moe's layout also.   The channels visually match the LED's 
and for me the most used jacks go from the bottom up to keep the 
cable clutter at the bottom.

And yes, I ordered one, so I now need to figure out my vote weight as 
run through Larry's vote equations.  

- Andy