MOTM

Records indicate approx. 488 previous MOTM users do *not* have one.

Paul S.

what percentage is that?

:-)

>Records indicate approx. 488 previous MOTM users do *not* have one.
>
>Paul S.

Hi Simon!

Quite simply, people aren't able to imagine what this module can do. 
On the other hand, those of us owning the '510 can't think of patching
without it!  Even with all of the sound clips on file, there is no way
to share the breadth and depth of the '510.  Any patch that requires
an animated modulation scheme is easily perfomed with the MOTM-510.

As for being dumped for frac-rack customers, I say hogwash!  Now that
the core of MOTM has been developed, bringing the same quality to the
compact synth crowd is only fair.  There are many circuits in each
camp that would benefit the other.  I love my Blacet modules, my CGS
modules, Papareil, Wilson, and my own odd designs.  That is what
MODULAR synths are all about, my friend!  Anyone can own a Minimoog. 
Only I have the awesome power of the Engine of Chaos at my disposal! 
Bwah-Ha-ha-ha-haaaa!!!  World domination is just within my grasp!!!

Sorry about that that.

Chub



--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Wheaton, Simon" <simon.wheaton@...> wrote:
>
> If it the 510 so good, and so many MOTM users do not have one yet,
why is it being discontinued?
>  
> It seems that the core MOTM format users that have made your
products a sucess are being dumped for shiny new frac-rack customers.
>  
> Simon
> Canberra
> AUSTRALIA
> ________________________________
> 
> From: Paul Schreiber
> Sent: Tue 3/10/2006 1:38 PM
> 
> Records indicate approx. 488 previous MOTM users do *not* have one.
> 
> Paul S. 
>   
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> This email, and any attachments, may be confidential and also
privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the
sender and delete all copies of this transmission along with any
attachments immediately. You should not copy or use it for any
purpose, nor disclose its contents to any other person.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...> wrote:
>
> Records indicate approx. 488 previous MOTM users do *not* have one.
> 
> Paul S.
>
I blame the schools myself.

Chub

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, Jason Proctor <jason@...> wrote:
>
> what percentage is that?
> 
That would be the "afraid of true power" percentile.  We do not speak
their names...

Chub

Wow! I didn't realize there were so many female customers!

(No subject, out of context, sorry, couldn't help myself, won't happen
again, I promise, no really, honest injun, etc)

On 10/2/06, Paul Schreiber <synth1@...> wrote:
>
>
> Records indicate approx. 488 previous MOTM users do *not* have one.
>
>  Paul S.
>
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen Drake
sduck409@...
makeme1witheverything@...