Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Thread

650 OS Update?

650 OS Update?

2008-12-01 by James Elliott

Paul, is there any news on the 650 OS update to resolve outstanding issues?

Thanks,
Jim





________________________________
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: James Elliott <johans121@...>
To: motm@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 12:56:03 AM
Subject: Re: [motm] 650 OS Update Status....


Here's the details of a bug that I turned in last year which causes my 650 to "crash".

Hopefully this gets addressed in the next update as it is frustrating to no end.

-Jim




Paul, you've asked the list to send you any errors / descriptions of funky behavior that we encounter. I've already sent you a general description of these problems on 10/13, and I will go into more detail here.

General Problem: My 650 quits responding to midi when I send midi cc's to control aux1. When I say quit responding I mean that the output jacks do not transmit a signal - the midi LED still responds to midi. One of two things happens once the 650 is in this state.

1) If I perform the following actions, then the 650 begins to respond to midi again (however it will lock up again if I send midi cc's to aux1)
-Press "ESC"
-Scroll to, and then select, "Module Actions"
-Scroll to, and then select, "Load Patch"
-and finally, load a patch

2) If I don't follow the steps above, I get various assert errors depending on different buttons that I press
-L612: I get this error when I press "Enter" after a lockup
-L2039: When I press "Inc" after a lockup
-L2167: When I press "dec" after a lockup
-L548: First I press "ESC", which allows me to scroll through the top level menu, then press "Enter" on any of the second level menu items 

My 650 is setup as follows:
-Global options:
1) Voice Type - 1/1/1/1
2) CtrlMidi Chan - 1
3) Trig PWM - 10ms
4) VelScale - 8 Volts
5) Backlight - Auto
6) TunTable - 12 Tone
7) Note Inv - Off
8) Priority - LastNote
9) Clock - Internal
10) IClk BPM - 120.0
11) Midi Clk - Transmit
12) Patch Rx - Disabled (I also tried enabled, whatever that does?)
13) SysexSys ID=Global

-VoiceGroup 1 Settings:
1) VG1 Midi Chan - 1
2) VG1 Allc - Solo
3) VG1Glide - Off
4) VG1PBend - 24
5) VG1GType - Normal
6) VG1 V/T - Velocity
7) VG1 Aux - CC12 (Tried others as well with the same issue resulting)
8) VG1AuxSc - 8 Volts

-VoiceGroups 2 - 4 are set up exactly like group 1 except that the PBends are set to 0, and the Aux Midi CC's are set to different values (13, 14, 15).

-Both Arps are turned off.

**This also happens in other other voice modes as well 4/poly1, 4/poly2, 2/2/poly1, etc.......

I really hope this gets fixed in the next patch release because having one of the 4 aux outs messed up sucks. Other than this problem, the 650 is a pretty cool module.

-Jim


----- Original Message ----
From: Paul Schreiber <synth1@...>
To: motm@yahoogroups.com; James Elliott <johans121@...>
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 12:20:53 AM
Subject: Re: [motm] 650 OS Update Status....


Hopefully Jeffrey will step in and give us an update. I have not heard from 
him in a while.

Meanwhile: the majority of the issues are using external clock to drive the 
arpeggiators and using Voice Group 1/1/1/1 (4 independent MIDI channels). 
The Voice Group
bug seems to be if you change from/into 1/1/1/1 mode. I think if you *start* 
there (the default patch) you are OK.

I have not heard of any other bugs/crashes except in these 2 cases. If 
anyone has other bug to report, please do so.

Paul S.
 
 


----- Forwarded Message ----
From: James Elliott <johans121@...>
To: motm@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2007 12:13:47 AM
Subject: [motm] 650 Aux 1 Bug?


I am encountering a very frustrating issue with my new 650. 

It seems as if I control aux 1 with a midi cc (as anyone would) my 650 becomes unresponsive to midi until I reload a patch. If I press enter on global options while in this state, I get an "Assert LXXXX" error message (they have been different each time, depending on what buttons I hit after this happens - the one I am starring at right now is L2028). When I get the error message, I have to power off my 650 completely to get it to work again. can't quite figure out what is causing this to happen. The only thing I am doing is sending cc information to control aux 1. 

This does not happen with aux2, 3, or 4.

I am in 1/1/1/1 mode with all voices receiving on channel 1.

Help!

Any ideas!!??!!

-Jim

.

Re: [motm] 650 OS Update?

2008-12-11 by James Elliott

Any news?

I know I can't be the only person that would like a fully operational $500 module that I waited over a year to receive.... I'm not trying to be an ass. But I would really like some kind of meaningful update.

-Jim




________________________________
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: James Elliott <johans121@yahoo.com>
To: motm@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, December 1, 2008 2:34:27 PM
Subject: [motm] 650 OS Update?


Paul, is there any news on the 650 OS update to resolve outstanding issues?

Thanks,
Jim





________________________________
From: James Elliott <johans121@yahoo. com>
To: motm@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 12:56:03 AM
Subject: Re: [motm] 650 OS Update Status....


Here's the details of a bug that I turned in last year which causes my 650 to "crash".

Hopefully this gets addressed in the next update as it is frustrating to no end.

-Jim




Paul, you've asked the list to send you any errors / descriptions of funky behavior that we encounter. I've already sent you a general description of these problems on 10/13, and I will go into more detail here.

General Problem: My 650 quits responding to midi when I send midi cc's to control aux1. When I say quit responding I mean that the output jacks do not transmit a signal - the midi LED still responds to midi. One of two things happens once the 650 is in this state.

1) If I perform the following actions, then the 650 begins to respond to midi again (however it will lock up again if I send midi cc's to aux1)
-Press "ESC"
-Scroll to, and then select, "Module Actions"
-Scroll to, and then select, "Load Patch"
-and finally, load a patch

2) If I don't follow the steps above, I get various assert errors depending on different buttons that I press
-L612: I get this error when I press "Enter" after a lockup
-L2039: When I press "Inc" after a lockup
-L2167: When I press "dec" after a lockup
-L548: First I press "ESC", which allows me to scroll through the top level menu, then press "Enter" on any of the second level menu items 

My 650 is setup as follows:
-Global options:
1) Voice Type - 1/1/1/1
2) CtrlMidi Chan - 1
3) Trig PWM - 10ms
4) VelScale - 8 Volts
5) Backlight - Auto
6) TunTable - 12 Tone
7) Note Inv - Off
8) Priority - LastNote
9) Clock - Internal
10) IClk BPM - 120.0
11) Midi Clk - Transmit
12) Patch Rx - Disabled (I also tried enabled, whatever that does?)
13) SysexSys ID=Global

-VoiceGroup 1 Settings:
1) VG1 Midi Chan - 1
2) VG1 Allc - Solo
3) VG1Glide - Off
4) VG1PBend - 24
5) VG1GType - Normal
6) VG1 V/T - Velocity
7) VG1 Aux - CC12 (Tried others as well with the same issue resulting)
8) VG1AuxSc - 8 Volts

-VoiceGroups 2 - 4 are set up exactly like group 1 except that the PBends are set to 0, and the Aux Midi CC's are set to different values (13, 14, 15).

-Both Arps are turned off.

**This also happens in other other voice modes as well 4/poly1, 4/poly2, 2/2/poly1, etc.......

I really hope this gets fixed in the next patch release because having one of the 4 aux outs messed up sucks. Other than this problem, the 650 is a pretty cool module.

-Jim


----- Original Message ----
From: Paul Schreiber <synth1@airmail. net>
To: motm@yahoogroups. com; James Elliott <johans121@yahoo. com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 12:20:53 AM
Subject: Re: [motm] 650 OS Update Status....


Hopefully Jeffrey will step in and give us an update. I have not heard from 
him in a while.

Meanwhile: the majority of the issues are using external clock to drive the 
arpeggiators and using Voice Group 1/1/1/1 (4 independent MIDI channels). 
The Voice Group
bug seems to be if you change from/into 1/1/1/1 mode. I think if you *start* 
there (the default patch) you are OK.

I have not heard of any other bugs/crashes except in these 2 cases. If 
anyone has other bug to report, please do so.

Paul S.
 
 


----- Forwarded Message ----
From: James Elliott <johans121@yahoo. com>
To: motm@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2007 12:13:47 AM
Subject: [motm] 650 Aux 1 Bug?


I am encountering a very frustrating issue with my new 650. 

It seems as if I control aux 1 with a midi cc (as anyone would) my 650 becomes unresponsive to midi until I reload a patch. If I press enter on global options while in this state, I get an "Assert LXXXX" error message (they have been different each time, depending on what buttons I hit after this happens - the one I am starring at right now is L2028). When I get the error message, I have to power off my 650 completely to get it to work again. can't quite figure out what is causing this to happen. The only thing I am doing is sending cc information to control aux 1. 

This does not happen with aux2, 3, or 4.

I am in 1/1/1/1 mode with all voices receiving on channel 1.

Help!

Any ideas!!??!!

-Jim

Re: [motm] 650 OS Update?

2008-12-11 by Aaron Day

I have stopped using mine because of the crashes. I thought about  
selling it but have held off for the hopes that it would, someday,  
become reliable.

So, I'll add my voice to the issue. I think its a fair question.

ad
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Dec 11, 2008, at 7:52 PM, James Elliott wrote:

>
> Any news?
>
> I know I can't be the only person that would like a fully  
> operational $500 module that I waited over a year to receive.... I'm  
> not trying to be an ass. But I would really like some kind of  
> meaningful update.
>
> -Jim
>
> From: James Elliott <johans121@...>
> To: motm@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Monday, December 1, 2008 2:34:27 PM
> Subject: [motm] 650 OS Update?
>
>
> Paul, is there any news on the 650 OS update to resolve outstanding  
> issues?
>
> Thanks,
> Jim
>
>
> From: James Elliott <johans121@yahoo. com>
> To: motm@yahoogroups. com
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 12:56:03 AM
> Subject: Re: [motm] 650 OS Update Status....
>
> Here's the details of a bug that I turned in last year which causes  
> my 650 to "crash".
>
> Hopefully this gets addressed in the next update as it is  
> frustrating to no end.
>
> -Jim
>
>
>
>
> Paul, you've asked the list to send you any errors / descriptions of  
> funky behavior that we encounter. I've already sent you a general  
> description of these problems on 10/13, and I will go into more  
> detail here.
>
> General Problem: My 650 quits responding to midi when I send midi  
> cc's to control aux1. When I say quit responding I mean that the  
> output jacks do not transmit a signal - the midi LED still responds  
> to midi. One of two things happens once the 650 is in this state.
>
> 1) If I perform the following actions, then the 650 begins to  
> respond to midi again (however it will lock up again if I send midi  
> cc's to aux1)
> -Press "ESC"
> -Scroll to, and then select, "Module Actions"
> -Scroll to, and then select, "Load Patch"
> -and finally, load a patch
>
> 2) If I don't follow the steps above, I get various assert errors  
> depending on different buttons that I press
> -L612: I get this error when I press "Enter" after a lockup
> -L2039: When I press "Inc" after a lockup
> -L2167: When I press "dec" after a lockup
> -L548: First I press "ESC", which allows me to scroll through the  
> top level menu, then press "Enter" on any of the second level menu  
> items
>
> My 650 is setup as follows:
> -Global options:
> 1) Voice Type - 1/1/1/1
> 2) CtrlMidi Chan - 1
> 3) Trig PWM - 10ms
> 4) VelScale - 8 Volts
> 5) Backlight - Auto
> 6) TunTable - 12 Tone
> 7) Note Inv - Off
> 8) Priority - LastNote
> 9) Clock - Internal
> 10) IClk BPM - 120.0
> 11) Midi Clk - Transmit
> 12) Patch Rx - Disabled (I also tried enabled, whatever that does?)
> 13) SysexSys ID=Global
>
> -VoiceGroup 1 Settings:
> 1) VG1 Midi Chan - 1
> 2) VG1 Allc - Solo
> 3) VG1Glide - Off
> 4) VG1PBend - 24
> 5) VG1GType - Normal
> 6) VG1 V/T - Velocity
> 7) VG1 Aux - CC12 (Tried others as well with the same issue resulting)
> 8) VG1AuxSc - 8 Volts
>
> -VoiceGroups 2 - 4 are set up exactly like group 1 except that the  
> PBends are set to 0, and the Aux Midi CC's are set to different  
> values (13, 14, 15).
>
> -Both Arps are turned off.
>
> **This also happens in other other voice modes as well 4/poly1, 4/ 
> poly2, 2/2/poly1, etc.......
>
> I really hope this gets fixed in the next patch release because  
> having one of the 4 aux outs messed up sucks. Other than this  
> problem, the 650 is a pretty cool module.
>
> -Jim
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Paul Schreiber <synth1@airmail. net>
> To: motm@yahoogroups. com; James Elliott <johans121@yahoo. com>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 12:20:53 AM
> Subject: Re: [motm] 650 OS Update Status....
>
> Hopefully Jeffrey will step in and give us an update. I have not  
> heard from
> him in a while.
>
> Meanwhile: the majority of the issues are using external clock to  
> drive the
> arpeggiators and using Voice Group 1/1/1/1 (4 independent MIDI  
> channels).
> The Voice Group
> bug seems to be if you change from/into 1/1/1/1 mode. I think if you  
> *start*
> there (the default patch) you are OK.
>
> I have not heard of any other bugs/crashes except in these 2 cases. If
> anyone has other bug to report, please do so.
>
> Paul S.
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Forwarded Message ----
> From: James Elliott <johans121@yahoo. com>
> To: motm@yahoogroups. com
> Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2007 12:13:47 AM
> Subject: [motm] 650 Aux 1 Bug?
>
>
> I am encountering a very frustrating issue with my new 650.
>
> It seems as if I control aux 1 with a midi cc (as anyone would) my  
> 650 becomes unresponsive to midi until I reload a patch. If I press  
> enter on global options while in this state, I get an "Assert LXXXX"  
> error message (they have been different each time, depending on what  
> buttons I hit after this happens - the one I am starring at right  
> now is L2028). When I get the error message, I have to power off my  
> 650 completely to get it to work again. can't quite figure out what  
> is causing this to happen. The only thing I am doing is sending cc  
> information to control aux 1.
>
> This does not happen with aux2, 3, or 4.
>
> I am in 1/1/1/1 mode with all voices receiving on channel 1.
>
> Help!
>
> Any ideas!!??!!
>
> -Jim
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [motm] 650 OS Update?

2008-12-11 by Scott Juskiw

Add me to the list as well. I don't play live so the problems aren't  
life threatening, but it still is maddening to have to resort to my  
Roland MPU-101 (circa 1984) for crash-free MIDI to CV.

MOTM-650: love the hardware, hate the software.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On 11-Dec-08, at 12:00 PM, Aaron Day wrote:

> I have stopped using mine because of the crashes. I thought about  
> selling it but have held off for the hopes that it would, someday,  
> become reliable.
>
> So, I'll add my voice to the issue. I think its a fair question.
>
> ad
>
>

Re: [motm] 650 OS Update?

2008-12-11 by Scott K Warren

Ditto.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Dec 11, 2008, at 2:10 PM, Scott Juskiw wrote:

> Add me to the list as well. I don't play live so the problems aren't
> life threatening, but it still is maddening to have to resort to my
> Roland MPU-101 (circa 1984) for crash-free MIDI to CV.
>
> MOTM-650: love the hardware, hate the software.
>
> On 11-Dec-08, at 12:00 PM, Aaron Day wrote:
>
>> I have stopped using mine because of the crashes. I thought about
>> selling it but have held off for the hopes that it would, someday,
>> become reliable.
>>
>> So, I'll add my voice to the issue. I think its a fair question.
>>
>> ad
>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

Re: [motm] 650 OS Update?

2008-12-11 by J.D. McEachin

At 10:52 AM 12/11/2008 -0800, James Elliott wrote:
>      Any news?    

Sorry, health problems have severely limited my time & energy.  


>  I am encountering a very frustrating issue with my new 650. 

Sorry to hear that.  Which version of the firmware do you have?


At 01:10 PM 12/11/2008 -0700, Scott Juskiw wrote:
>
>MOTM-650: love the hardware, hate the software.

How so?

JD

Re: [motm] 650 OS Update?

2008-12-11 by Ti_

Has anyone else had any issues with channels 3&4 in particular?  Mine are all sorts of funky when it comes to attempting a full 1/1/1/1  style patching.  Here's a short basic description:
> Channels 1&2 seem to work fine no matter what. The wierd stuff is between 3&4. 
They both work fine on any midi channel...but ONLY as long as they are both set to the same midi channel.
If 3 is on a different channel than 4 it only produces about 2 octaves untill the pitch hangs and won't go any higher 
and 4 acts the same way. All of the VG's are in solo monophonic mode. Both Arppegiators are Off. 
The firmware installed is 1.3<
The specifics got even more bizarre as I dug deeper into the issue but that's the basis of it.  I've always wanted to use the 650 to essentially be able to send out 4 separate melodies, harmonies, and or bass lines, but I can essentially only output 2 lines and occasionally I just use 3&4 for triggers since that's about all I can count on working as it does.
~Tim




________________________________
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: J.D. McEachin <jdm@...>
To: motm@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 2:39:05 PM
Subject: Re: [motm] 650 OS Update?


At 10:52 AM 12/11/2008 -0800, James Elliott wrote:
>      Any news? 

Sorry, health problems have severely limited my time & energy. 

>  I am encountering a very frustrating issue with my new 650. 

Sorry to hear that.  Which version of the firmware do you have?

At 01:10 PM 12/11/2008 -0700, Scott Juskiw wrote:
>
>MOTM-650: love the hardware, hate the software.

How so?

JD

Re: [motm] 650 OS Update?

2008-12-11 by Jeff Laity

Sorry to hear about your health issues.

I had one crash so far. I had it set up in mono (single channel,  
single voice) mode, MIDI channel 2, with MIDI thru from a Moog  
Voyager. The unit locked up and showed "Q4 BAD" or something like that  
in the display. I switched it off and on and it's been OK since. I've  
since rewired it so that I have a direct MIDI out of my MOTU MIDI  
Timepiece AV going into the 650 MIDI input, with it set to MIDI  
channel 1.

On Dec 11, 2008, at 2:25 PM, Ti_ wrote:
>
> Has anyone else had any issues with channels 3&4 in particular?   
> Mine are all sorts of funky when it comes to attempting a full  
> 1/1/1/1  style patching.  Here's a short basic description:
> > Channels 1&2 seem to work fine no matter what. The wierd stuff is  
> between 3&4.
> They both work fine on any midi channel...but ONLY as long as they  
> are both set to the same midi channel.
> If 3 is on a different channel than 4 it only produces about 2  
> octaves untill the pitch hangs and won't go any higher
> and 4 acts the same way. All of the VG's are in solo monophonic  
> mode. Both Arppegiators are Off.
> The firmware installed is 1.3<
> The specifics got even more bizarre as I dug deeper into the issue  
> but that's the basis of it.  I've always wanted to use the 650 to  
> essentially be able to send out 4 separate melodies, harmonies, and  
> or bass lines, but I can essentially only output 2 lines and  
> occasionally I just use 3&4 for triggers since that's about all I  
> can count on working as it does.
> ~Tim
>
> From: J.D. McEachin <jdm@...>
> To: motm@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 2:39:05 PM
> Subject: Re: [motm] 650 OS Update?
>
> At 10:52 AM 12/11/2008 -0800, James Elliott wrote:
> > Any news?
>
> Sorry, health problems have severely limited my time & energy.
>
> > I am encountering a very frustrating issue with my new 650.
>
> Sorry to hear that. Which version of the firmware do you have?
>
> At 01:10 PM 12/11/2008 -0700, Scott Juskiw wrote:
> >
> >MOTM-650: love the hardware, hate the software.
>
> How so?
>
> JD
>
>
>
>
> 


NOTICE: This electronic mail message and its contents, including any attachments hereto (collectively, "this e-mail"), is hereby designated as "confidential and proprietary." This e-mail\ufffdmay be viewed and used only by the person to whom it has been sent and his/her employer\ufffdsolely for the express purpose for which it has been disclosed and only in\ufffdaccordance with any confidentiality or non-disclosure (or similar) agreement between TEAC Corporation or its affiliates and said employer, and may not be disclosed to any other person or entity. \ufffd
\ufffd

 


\ufffd

Re: [motm] 650 OS Update?

2008-12-12 by Ti_

Just to Clarify, it's not Midi channels I've got issues with but CV 3 & 4 that seem to get all tangled up when in the quad polyphonic mode.
~Tim


On Dec 11, 2008, at 2:25 PM, Ti_ wrote:
>
> Has anyone else had any issues with channels 3&4 in particular?  
> Mine are all sorts of funky when it comes to attempting a full  
> 1/1/1/1  style patching.  Here's a short basic description:
> > Channels 1&2 seem to work fine no matter what. The wierd stuff is  
> between 3&4.
> They both work fine on any midi channel...but ONLY as long as they  
> are both set to the same midi channel.
> If 3 is on a different channel than 4 it only produces about 2  
> octaves untill the pitch hangs and won't go any higher
> and 4 acts the same way. All of the VG's are in solo monophonic  
> mode. Both Arppegiators are Off.
> The firmware installed is 1.3<
> The specifics got even more bizarre as I dug deeper into the issue  
> but that's the basis of it.  I've always wanted to use the 650 to  
> essentially be able to send out 4 separate melodies, harmonies, and  
> or bass lines, but I can essentially only output 2 lines and  
> occasionally I just use 3&4 for triggers since that's about all I  
> can count on working as it does.
> ~Tim
>
> From: J.D. McEachin <jdm@...>
> To: motm@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 2:39:05 PM
> Subject: Re: [motm] 650 OS Update?
>
> At 10:52 AM 12/11/2008 -0800, James Elliott wrote:
> > Any news?
>
> Sorry, health problems have severely limited my time & energy.
>
> > I am encountering a very frustrating issue with my new 650.
>
> Sorry to hear that. Which version of the firmware do you have?
>
> At 01:10 PM 12/11/2008 -0700, Scott Juskiw wrote:
> >
> >MOTM-650: love the hardware, hate the software.
>
> How so?
>
> JD
>
>
>
>
> 


NOTICE: This electronic mail message and its contents, including any attachments hereto (collectively, "this e-mail"), is hereby designated as "confidential and proprietary." This e-mail may be viewed and used only by the person to whom it has been sent and his/her employer solely for the express purpose for which it has been disclosed and only in accordance with any confidentiality or non-disclosure (or similar) agreement between TEAC Corporation or its affiliates and said employer, and may not be disclosed to any other person or entity.  
 




 

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

Re: 650 OS Update?

2008-12-12 by djbrow54

650 MIDI clock and external MIDI clock differ by 2X.  Would be nice 
if someone else could verify this.  It's been so long since I looked 
at this I don't remember if it's too fast or too slow.

Dave

Re: [motm] Re: 650 OS Update?

2008-12-12 by Jeff Laity

I just sent MIDI clock from Logic 8 and at "1x" it plays 16th notes. I  
assume that's correct.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Dec 11, 2008, at 7:25 PM, djbrow54 wrote:

> 650 MIDI clock and external MIDI clock differ by 2X. Would be nice  
> if someone else could verify this. It's been so long since I looked  
> at this I don't remember if it's too fast or too slow.
>
> Dave
>

Re: [motm] Re: 650 OS Update?

2008-12-12 by Neil Bradley

> 650 MIDI clock and external MIDI clock differ by 2X.  Would be nice
> if someone else could verify this.  It's been so long since I looked
> at this I don't remember if it's too fast or too slow.

Are you 100% sure that you didn't have MIDI clock multiplication turned 
on?

-->Neil

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Neil Bradley - EVERYBODY KERNEL PANIC!

Re: [motm] Re: 650 OS Update?

2008-12-12 by thomas white

I too would like my 650 to work as advertised. The
external clock issues are my biggest concern. I have
not personally had issues with controlling 4 separate
voices as mentioned by someone else.

I am using it as a clock generator right now. To be
fair to Paul, it is not completely broken, and these
small issues we all experience start to seem larger
than life when we start posting our findings to this
list. 

However, I would like to know what to expect. Paul did
not write the code,and I fully understand health
problems, but future modules are going to have digital
code and that concerns me when that is the problem
with the 650. I too humbly wait for a new bug-fix
update. 

Thomas

--- Jeff Laity <synthetic@...> wrote:

> I just sent MIDI clock from Logic 8 and at "1x" it
> plays 16th notes. I  
> assume that's correct.
> 
> On Dec 11, 2008, at 7:25 PM, djbrow54 wrote:
> 
> > 650 MIDI clock and external MIDI clock differ by
> 2X. Would be nice  
> > if someone else could verify this. It's been so
> long since I looked  
> > at this I don't remember if it's too fast or too
> slow.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> 
> 


Thomas White
  Natural Rhythm
www.naturalrhythmmusic.com

Re: 650 OS Update?

2008-12-12 by djbrow54

I'm not sure.  I gave up a long time ago.  If I have time I will try 
and reverify. - Dave


--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, Neil Bradley <nb@...> wrote:
>
> > 650 MIDI clock and external MIDI clock differ by 2X.  Would be 
nice
> > if someone else could verify this.  It's been so long since I 
looked
> > at this I don't remember if it's too fast or too slow.
> 
> Are you 100% sure that you didn't have MIDI clock multiplication 
turned 
> on?
> 
> -->Neil
> 
> 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> C. Neil Bradley - EVERYBODY KERNEL PANIC!
>

Re: 650 OS Update?

2008-12-12 by djbrow54

I re-setup my system.  The only MIDI clock multiplier I know is for 
the arpeggiator.  ARP1 is set to 1X and ARP2 is off.  I'm using the 
clock output from channel 1 (Aux=clock).

If I set the clock to internal at 120 bpm, I get clock pulses at 125 
mS, or 8/second, 480/minute.  At 4 clocks per quarter note, =120 BPM.

Now if I leave everything exactly the same, and set the clock to 
MIDI, and set my controller to 120 BPM, the clock is now 250 mS or 
1/2 the frequency. Shouldn't these be the same frequency?

I believe the 650 is dividing the MIDI clock 2X too much.

Somebody else please check this.  Am I missing a clock setting 
somewhere?

Dave

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, Neil Bradley <nb@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> > 650 MIDI clock and external MIDI clock differ by 2X.  Would be
> > nice if someone else could verify this.  It's been so long since
> > I looked at this I don't remember if it's too fast or too slow.
> 
> Are you 100% sure that you didn't have MIDI clock multiplication
> turned on?
> 
> -->Neil

Re: 650 OS Update?

2008-12-14 by djbrow54

I pulled out my Alesis HR-16 drum machine and verified that a 120 BPM 
setting produced 250 mS clocks from the MOTM-650 while the internal 
clock generates 125 mS clocks. I've now verified equal results with 
two different external midi clock sources. I get 1/2 the clock rate 
with an external midi source when compared to the internal clock. I 
believe the internal clock is correct and the external midi clock is 
divided too low.

I also verified the ArpClkDv setting has no affect on the clock 
output as I would have expected.

Dave

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "djbrow54" <davebr@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> I re-setup my system.  The only MIDI clock multiplier I know is for 
> the arpeggiator.  ARP1 is set to 1X and ARP2 is off.  I'm using the 
> clock output from channel 1 (Aux=clock).
> 
> If I set the clock to internal at 120 bpm, I get clock pulses
> at 125 mS, or 8/second, 480/minute.  At 4 clocks per quarter
> note, =120 BPM.
> 
> Now if I leave everything exactly the same, and set the clock to 
> MIDI, and set my controller to 120 BPM, the clock is now 250 mS or 
> 1/2 the frequency. Shouldn't these be the same frequency?
> 
> I believe the 650 is dividing the MIDI clock 2X too much.
> 
> Somebody else please check this.  Am I missing a clock setting 
> somewhere?
> 
> Dave
> 
> --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, Neil Bradley <nb@> wrote:
> > > 650 MIDI clock and external MIDI clock differ by 2X.  Would be
> > > nice if someone else could verify this.  It's been so long since
> > > I looked at this I don't remember if it's too fast or too slow.
> > 
> > Are you 100% sure that you didn't have MIDI clock multiplication
> > turned on?
> > 
> > -->Neil
>

Re: 650 OS Update?

2008-12-14 by djbrow54

It's past midnight and I've gotten myself confused. Can someone 
explain to me what the frequency of the Aux output should be when set 
to ClkPulse and the MOTM-650 receives a Midi clock from an external 
source set to 120 BPM?  Explain the math, please

I realized I was confusing 96 PPQN for a sequencer with the 24 PPQ 
for standard MIDI clock where I came up with the math in my original 
posting.

I still believe there is an issue since the clock output differs 
between internal clock and external clock set to the same BPM. I'm 
trying to convince myself which is correct and I'm starting to think 
neither is.

Dave

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "djbrow54" <davebr@...> wrote:
>
> I pulled out my Alesis HR-16 drum machine and verified that a 120
> BPM setting produced 250 mS clocks from the MOTM-650 while the
> internal clock generates 125 mS clocks. I've now verified equal
> results with two different external midi clock sources. I get 1/2
> the clock rate with an external midi source when compared to the
> internal clock. I believe the internal clock is correct and the
> external midi clock is divided too low.
> 
> I also verified the ArpClkDv setting has no affect on the clock 
> output as I would have expected.
> 
> Dave
> 
> --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "djbrow54" <davebr@> wrote:
> > I re-setup my system.  The only MIDI clock multiplier I know is
> > for the arpeggiator.  ARP1 is set to 1X and ARP2 is off. I'm
> > using the clock output from channel 1 (Aux=clock).
> > 
> > If I set the clock to internal at 120 bpm, I get clock pulses
> > at 125 mS, or 8/second, 480/minute.  At 4 clocks per quarter
> > note, =120 BPM.
> > 
> > Now if I leave everything exactly the same, and set the clock to 
> > MIDI, and set my controller to 120 BPM, the clock is now 250 mS 
or 
> > 1/2 the frequency. Shouldn't these be the same frequency?
> > 
> > I believe the 650 is dividing the MIDI clock 2X too much.
> > 
> > Somebody else please check this.  Am I missing a clock setting 
> > somewhere?
> > 
> > Dave
> > 
> > --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, Neil Bradley <nb@> wrote:
> > > > 650 MIDI clock and external MIDI clock differ by 2X.  Would be
> > > > nice if someone else could verify this.  It's been so long 
since
> > > > I looked at this I don't remember if it's too fast or too 
slow.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> > > 
> > > Are you 100% sure that you didn't have MIDI clock multiplication
> > > turned on?
> > > 
> > > -->Neil
> >
>

650 OS Update?

2009-01-23 by James Elliott

Ok, this thing is really making me mad. For real. I just used an analog external clock (motm 320) to drive the ARP on my 650 for the first time ever, and while I was going through the ARP settings my 650 locked up and gave me a "HOSED Q6" error!!!

Really? Come on. A HOSED error!? Really? I could stomache the 'Assert' errors, but a HOSED error?

I am soo fed up with this thing.

Paul, really, when is this thing going to get an OS update? I am soo tired of it that it makes me sick that I paid as much as I did and waited over a year, after paying for it, to receive it - and still haven't heard anything regarding an update for it a year and a half
after placing my first bug report.

-Jim




________________________________
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: James Elliott <johans121@...>
To: motm@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2008 12:22:48 PM
Subject: Re: [motm] . Re: 650 OS Update?


Paul, once again not to sound like an ass, but I don't see the
point in bringing up Robert Rich. He might have different needs then
some of us do when it comes to our 650.

example:
I've always
wanted a spectralis. On paper, that thing is truly bad ass. The reason
I never bought one is because it is 'full' of 'features' that have yet
to be implemented - and those missing features are well documented and
are readily available to the public. Many people have purchased a
spectralis knowing that there are 'features' that were advertised but
do not exist. Some of those people have made wonderful music with that
machine even though it doesn't work as advertised. Other people, like
me, have decided to pass on it until certain promised features are
actually there. 

Back to Robert Rich & me. When I try to
play the way I want to, my 650 craps out every time. At this point I'm
so frustrated with it I hardly use it. I really don't care about
Robert's success with his, all I can really say is, good for him.

I
would not have purchased my 650 knowing that using 1 out of the 4 aux
outs causes it to crash (among other things). It would have been nice
if there was a published list of known bugs so I could have made an
informed decision before purchasing it & then having to wait over a
year to receive it. I think a constant appearance of used 650's on the
market would probably hurt new sales at some point. So I would imagine
that getting the OS updated would be a priority, especially since the
650 would be the heart in a lot of different systems (be it a synthtech
modular, somebody else's modular, or possibly a studio full of vintage
synths, or maybe for that special someone with a bunch of digital
delays that have CV inputs on them [which I would imagine would be a
lot of fun]).

-Jim


________________________________
From: Paul Schreiber <synth1@...>
To: ivancu@...; motm@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 9:48:03 AM
Subject: Re: [motm] . Re: 650 OS Update?

 > And all of this is a great example how one digital product can be a huge 
> suck on developing new analog products.
>

Not in this case. I designed the hardware only. The SW issues have not 
hampered the
development of *anything*.

I'm sure that when Jeffrey is able he will fix the issues. There is a LOT 
going on inside that little 8051,
memory is at a premium and this is why new MOTM uPs are all 32-bit ARMs with 
16X the speed and
memory capacity of the '650 uP.

The firmware can be upgraded over MIDI using the WinXP utility so when the 
fix is available it's a quick
process. Those of you with Macs have a friend with a PC :)

Yes, there are known bug. But then again, Robert Rich has made 5 new CDs and 
been on 3 live tours with
the V1.3 SW so it's not like it's totally unusable.

Paul S.




________________________________
From: James Elliott <johans121@...>
To: motm@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 12:52:03 PM
Subject: Re: [motm] 650 OS Update?


Any news?
 
I know I can't be the only person that would like a fully
operational $500 module that I waited over a year to receive.... I'm
not trying to be an ass. But I would really like some kind of
meaningful update.
 
-Jim




________________________________
 From: James Elliott <johans121@...>
To: motm@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, December 1, 2008 2:34:27 PM
Subject: [motm] 650 OS Update?


Paul, is there any news on the 650 OS update to resolve outstanding issues?
 
Thanks,
Jim





________________________________
 From: James Elliott <johans121@yahoo. com>
To: motm@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 12:56:03 AM
Subject: Re: [motm] 650 OS Update Status....


Here's the details of a bug that I turned in last year which causes my 650 to "crash".

Hopefully this gets addressed in the next update as it is frustrating to no end.

-Jim




Paul,
you've asked the list to send you any errors / descriptions of funky
behavior that we encounter. I've already sent you a general description
of these problems on 10/13, and I will go into more detail here.

General
Problem: My 650 quits responding to midi when I send midi cc's to
control aux1. When I say quit responding I mean that the output jacks
do not transmit a signal - the midi LED still responds to midi. One of
two things happens once the 650 is in this state.

1) If I
perform the following actions, then the 650 begins to respond to midi
again (however it will lock up again if I send midi cc's to aux1)
-Press "ESC"
-Scroll to, and then select, "Module Actions"
-Scroll to, and then select, "Load Patch"
-and finally, load a patch

2) If I don't follow the steps above, I get various assert errors depending on different buttons that I press
-L612: I get this error when I press "Enter" after a lockup
-L2039: When I press "Inc" after a lockup
-L2167: When I press "dec" after a lockup
-L548:
First I press "ESC", which allows me to scroll through the top level
menu, then press "Enter" on any of the second level menu items 

My 650 is setup as follows:
-Global options:
1) Voice Type - 1/1/1/1
2) CtrlMidi Chan - 1
3) Trig PWM - 10ms
4) VelScale - 8 Volts
5) Backlight - Auto
6) TunTable - 12 Tone
7) Note Inv - Off
8) Priority - LastNote
9) Clock - Internal
10) IClk BPM - 120.0
11) Midi Clk - Transmit
12) Patch Rx - Disabled (I also tried enabled, whatever that does?)
13) SysexSys ID=Global

-VoiceGroup 1 Settings:
1) VG1 Midi Chan - 1
2) VG1 Allc - Solo
3) VG1Glide - Off
4) VG1PBend - 24
5) VG1GType - Normal
6) VG1 V/T - Velocity
7) VG1 Aux - CC12 (Tried others as well with the same issue resulting)
8) VG1AuxSc - 8 Volts

-VoiceGroups
2 - 4 are set up exactly like group 1 except that the PBends are set to
0, and the Aux Midi CC's are set to different values (13, 14, 15).

-Both Arps are turned off.

**This also happens in other other voice modes as well 4/poly1, 4/poly2, 2/2/poly1, etc.......

I
really hope this gets fixed in the next patch release because having
one of the 4 aux outs messed up sucks. Other than this problem, the 650
is a pretty cool module.

-Jim


----- Original Message ----
From: Paul Schreiber <synth1@airmail. net>
To: motm@yahoogroups. com; James Elliott <johans121@yahoo. com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 12:20:53 AM
Subject: Re: [motm] 650 OS Update Status....


Hopefully Jeffrey will step in and give us an update. I have not heard from 
him in a while.

Meanwhile: the majority of the issues are using external clock to drive the 
arpeggiators and using Voice Group 1/1/1/1 (4 independent MIDI channels). 
The Voice Group
bug seems to be if you change from/into 1/1/1/1 mode. I think if you *start* 
there (the default patch) you are OK.

I have not heard of any other bugs/crashes except in these 2 cases. If 
anyone has other bug to report, please do so.

Paul S.
 
 


----- Forwarded Message ----
From: James Elliott <johans121@yahoo. com>
To: motm@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2007 12:13:47 AM
Subject: [motm] 650 Aux 1 Bug?


I am encountering a very frustrating issue with my new 650. 

It
seems as if I control aux 1 with a midi cc (as anyone would) my 650
becomes unresponsive to midi until I reload a patch. If I press enter
on global options while in this state, I get an "Assert LXXXX" error
message (they have been different each time, depending on what buttons
I hit after this happens - the one I am starring at right now is
L2028). When I get the error message, I have to power off my 650
completely to get it to work again. can't quite figure out what is
causing this to happen. The only thing I am doing is sending cc
information to control aux 1. 

This does not happen with aux2, 3, or 4.

I am in 1/1/1/1 mode with all voices receiving on channel 1.

Help!

Any ideas!!??!!

-Jim


__._,_.__

Re: [motm] 650 OS Update?

2009-01-27 by James Elliott

So, is my request for a meaningful update just going to go ignored?




________________________________
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: James Elliott <johans121@...>
To: motm@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 3:21:43 PM
Subject: [motm] 650 OS Update?


Ok, this thing is really making me mad. For real. I just used an analog external clock (motm 320) to drive the ARP on my 650 for the first time ever, and while I was going through the ARP settings my 650 locked up and gave me a "HOSED Q6" error!!!

Really? Come on. A HOSED error!? Really? I could stomache the 'Assert' errors, but a HOSED error?

I am soo fed up with this thing.

Paul, really, when is this thing going to get an OS update? I am soo tired of it that it makes me sick that I paid as much as I did and waited over a year, after paying for it, to receive it - and still haven't heard anything regarding an update for it a year and a half
after placing my first bug report.

-Jim




________________________________
From: James Elliott <johans121@yahoo. com>
To: motm@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2008 12:22:48 PM
Subject: Re: [motm] . Re: 650 OS Update?


Paul, once again not to sound like an ass, but I don't see the
point in bringing up Robert Rich. He might have different needs then
some of us do when it comes to our 650.

example:
I've always
wanted a spectralis. On paper, that thing is truly bad ass. The reason
I never bought one is because it is 'full' of 'features' that have yet
to be implemented - and those missing features are well documented and
are readily available to the public. Many people have purchased a
spectralis knowing that there are 'features' that were advertised but
do not exist. Some of those people have made wonderful music with that
machine even though it doesn't work as advertised. Other people, like
me, have decided to pass on it until certain promised features are
actually there. 

Back to Robert Rich & me. When I try to
play the way I want to, my 650 craps out every time. At this point I'm
so frustrated with it I hardly use it. I really don't care about
Robert's success with his, all I can really say is, good for him.

I
would not have purchased my 650 knowing that using 1 out of the 4 aux
outs causes it to crash (among other things). It would have been nice
if there was a published list of known bugs so I could have made an
informed decision before purchasing it & then having to wait over a
year to receive it. I think a constant appearance of used 650's on the
market would probably hurt new sales at some point. So I would imagine
that getting the OS updated would be a priority, especially since the
650 would be the heart in a lot of different systems (be it a synthtech
modular, somebody else's modular, or possibly a studio full of vintage
synths, or maybe for that special someone with a bunch of digital
delays that have CV inputs on them [which I would imagine would be a
lot of fun]).

-Jim


________________________________
From: Paul Schreiber <synth1@airmail. net>
To: ivancu@...; motm@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 9:48:03 AM
Subject: Re: [motm] . Re: 650 OS Update?

> And all of this is a great example how one digital product can be a huge 
> suck on developing new analog products.
>

Not in this case. I designed the hardware only. The SW issues have not 
hampered the
development of *anything*.

I'm sure that when Jeffrey is able he will fix the issues. There is a LOT 
going on inside that little 8051,
memory is at a premium and this is why new MOTM uPs are all 32-bit ARMs with 
16X the speed and
memory capacity of the '650 uP.

The firmware can be upgraded over MIDI using the WinXP utility so when the 
fix is available it's a quick
process. Those of you with Macs have a friend with a PC :)

Yes, there are known bug. But then again, Robert Rich has made 5 new CDs and 
been on 3 live tours with
the V1.3 SW so it's not like it's totally unusable.

Paul S.




________________________________
From: James Elliott <johans121@yahoo. com>
To: motm@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 12:52:03 PM
Subject: Re: [motm] 650 OS Update?


Any news?
 
I know I can't be the only person that would like a fully
operational $500 module that I waited over a year to receive.... I'm
not trying to be an ass. But I would really like some kind of
meaningful update.
 
-Jim




________________________________
 From: James Elliott <johans121@yahoo. com>
To: motm@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Monday, December 1, 2008 2:34:27 PM
Subject: [motm] 650 OS Update?


Paul, is there any news on the 650 OS update to resolve outstanding issues?
 
Thanks,
Jim





________________________________
 From: James Elliott <johans121@yahoo. com>
To: motm@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 12:56:03 AM
Subject: Re: [motm] 650 OS Update Status....


Here's the details of a bug that I turned in last year which causes my 650 to "crash".

Hopefully this gets addressed in the next update as it is frustrating to no end.

-Jim




Paul,
you've asked the list to send you any errors / descriptions of funky
behavior that we encounter. I've already sent you a general description
of these problems on 10/13, and I will go into more detail here.

General
Problem: My 650 quits responding to midi when I send midi cc's to
control aux1. When I say quit responding I mean that the output jacks
do not transmit a signal - the midi LED still responds to midi. One of
two things happens once the 650 is in this state.

1) If I
perform the following actions, then the 650 begins to respond to midi
again (however it will lock up again if I send midi cc's to aux1)
-Press "ESC"
-Scroll to, and then select, "Module Actions"
-Scroll to, and then select, "Load Patch"
-and finally, load a patch

2) If I don't follow the steps above, I get various assert errors depending on different buttons that I press
-L612: I get this error when I press "Enter" after a lockup
-L2039: When I press "Inc" after a lockup
-L2167: When I press "dec" after a lockup
-L548:
First I press "ESC", which allows me to scroll through the top level
menu, then press "Enter" on any of the second level menu items 

My 650 is setup as follows:
-Global options:
1) Voice Type - 1/1/1/1
2) CtrlMidi Chan - 1
3) Trig PWM - 10ms
4) VelScale - 8 Volts
5) Backlight - Auto
6) TunTable - 12 Tone
7) Note Inv - Off
8) Priority - LastNote
9) Clock - Internal
10) IClk BPM - 120.0
11) Midi Clk - Transmit
12) Patch Rx - Disabled (I also tried enabled, whatever that does?)
13) SysexSys ID=Global

-VoiceGroup 1 Settings:
1) VG1 Midi Chan - 1
2) VG1 Allc - Solo
3) VG1Glide - Off
4) VG1PBend - 24
5) VG1GType - Normal
6) VG1 V/T - Velocity
7) VG1 Aux - CC12 (Tried others as well with the same issue resulting)
8) VG1AuxSc - 8 Volts

-VoiceGroups
2 - 4 are set up exactly like group 1 except that the PBends are set to
0, and the Aux Midi CC's are set to different values (13, 14, 15).

-Both Arps are turned off.

**This also happens in other other voice modes as well 4/poly1, 4/poly2, 2/2/poly1, etc.......

I
really hope this gets fixed in the next patch release because having
one of the 4 aux outs messed up sucks. Other than this problem, the 650
is a pretty cool module.

-Jim


----- Original Message ----
From: Paul Schreiber <synth1@airmail. net>
To: motm@yahoogroups. com; James Elliott <johans121@yahoo. com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 12:20:53 AM
Subject: Re: [motm] 650 OS Update Status....


Hopefully Jeffrey will step in and give us an update. I have not heard from 
him in a while.

Meanwhile: the majority of the issues are using external clock to drive the 
arpeggiators and using Voice Group 1/1/1/1 (4 independent MIDI channels). 
The Voice Group
bug seems to be if you change from/into 1/1/1/1 mode. I think if you *start* 
there (the default patch) you are OK.

I have not heard of any other bugs/crashes except in these 2 cases. If 
anyone has other bug to report, please do so.

Paul S.
 
 


----- Forwarded Message ----
From: James Elliott <johans121@yahoo. com>
To: motm@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2007 12:13:47 AM
Subject: [motm] 650 Aux 1 Bug?


I am encountering a very frustrating issue with my new 650. 

It
seems as if I control aux 1 with a midi cc (as anyone would) my 650
becomes unresponsive to midi until I reload a patch. If I press enter
on global options while in this state, I get an "Assert LXXXX" error
message (they have been different each time, depending on what buttons
I hit after this happens - the one I am starring at right now is
L2028). When I get the error message, I have to power off my 650
completely to get it to work again. can't quite figure out what is
causing this to happen. The only thing I am doing is sending cc
information to control aux 1. 

This does not happen with aux2, 3, or 4.

I am in 1/1/1/1 mode with all voices receiving on channel 1.

Help!

Any ideas!!??!!

-Jim


__._,_.__

Re: [motm] 650 OS Update?

2009-01-27 by Paul Schreiber

So, is my request for a meaningful update just going to go ignored?

Well, if 'update' means "something new to report", then there is no update.

To spell it out:

a) I did not write the code
b) I do not have access to the code
c) the person who has the code is aware of the problems, but has had ongoing
health issues. I have emailed him several times, and gotten no response.
d) I have NO IDEA if, or when, a code update will happen
e) I have taken corrective measures for future modules (both in HW and SW)
to assure this situation does not happen again
f) if anyone is unhappy with any MOTM module, for any reason, just email me.
I will issue a refund *immediately* upon it's return.

Paul S.

Re: [motm] 650 OS Update?

2009-02-03 by Jason Proctor

is the source to the 650 available?

in the absence of the original author, maybe the community could have 
a go at fixing it.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>So, is my request for a meaningful update just going to go ignored?
>
>Well, if 'update' means "something new to report", then there is no update.
>
>To spell it out:
>
>a) I did not write the code
>b) I do not have access to the code
>c) the person who has the code is aware of the problems, but has had ongoing
>health issues. I have emailed him several times, and gotten no response.
>d) I have NO IDEA if, or when, a code update will happen
>e) I have taken corrective measures for future modules (both in HW and SW)
>to assure this situation does not happen again
>f) if anyone is unhappy with any MOTM module, for any reason, just email me.
>I will issue a refund *immediately* upon it's return.
>
>Paul S.
>

Re: [motm] 650 OS Update?

2009-02-03 by John Blacet

---A post from Paul a week or so ago states that he does not have access
to the code--very scary!


> is the source to the 650 available?
>
> in the absence of the original author, maybe the community could have
> a go at fixing it.
>
>
>
>
>
>>So, is my request for a meaningful update just going to go ignored?
>>
>>Well, if 'update' means "something new to report", then there is no
>> update.
>>
>>To spell it out:
>>
>>a) I did not write the code
>>b) I do not have access to the code
>>c) the person who has the code is aware of the problems, but has had
>> ongoing
>>health issues. I have emailed him several times, and gotten no response.
>>d) I have NO IDEA if, or when, a code update will happen
>>e) I have taken corrective measures for future modules (both in HW and
>> SW)
>>to assure this situation does not happen again
>>f) if anyone is unhappy with any MOTM module, for any reason, just email
>> me.
>>I will issue a refund *immediately* upon it's return.
>>
>>Paul S.
>>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
John Blacet

Re: [motm] 650 OS Update?

2009-02-03 by Aaron Day

He wrote me and said the same thing. It sounds kind of cheesy but  
maybe we could send a group letter to the SW engineer and ask/plead  
that he release it. I think it is Paul's responsibility to get the SW  
going but that doesn't mean we can't help.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Feb 3, 2009, at 8:35 PM, John Blacet wrote:

> ---A post from Paul a week or so ago states that he does not have  
> access
> to the code--very scary!
>
> > is the source to the 650 available?
> >
> > in the absence of the original author, maybe the community could  
> have
> > a go at fixing it.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>So, is my request for a meaningful update just going to go ignored?
> >>
> >>Well, if 'update' means "something new to report", then there is no
> >> update.
> >>
> >>To spell it out:
> >>
> >>a) I did not write the code
> >>b) I do not have access to the code
> >>c) the person who has the code is aware of the problems, but has had
> >> ongoing
> >>health issues. I have emailed him several times, and gotten no  
> response.
> >>d) I have NO IDEA if, or when, a code update will happen
> >>e) I have taken corrective measures for future modules (both in HW  
> and
> >> SW)
> >>to assure this situation does not happen again
> >>f) if anyone is unhappy with any MOTM module, for any reason, just  
> email
> >> me.
> >>I will issue a refund *immediately* upon it's return.
> >>
> >>Paul S.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> -- 
> John Blacet
>
>
>

Re: [motm] 650 OS Update?

2009-02-03 by Jason Proctor

>He wrote me and said the same thing. It sounds kind of cheesy but 
>maybe we could send a group letter to the SW engineer and ask/plead 
>that he release it.

i dug up a post from JD saying that he was going to ask "his friend 
Neil" to open source it. i just shot him a note asking whether there 
have been any developments there.

>I think it is Paul's responsibility to get the SW going but that 
>doesn't mean we can't help.

right. something needs to happen, clearly.

Re: [motm] 650 OS Update?

2009-02-03 by Jason Proctor

>He wrote me and said the same thing. It sounds kind of cheesy but
>maybe we could send a group letter to the SW engineer and ask/plead
>that he release it.

in any case, it doesn't need to be a full scale distribution, where 
dodgy things like rights get involved. more like an expansion of the 
development team :-)

Re: [motm] 650 OS Update?

2009-02-03 by xamboldt

If details about the processor and the hardware are known, what's to  
stop an alternative open-source firmware from being created from  
scratch?

Granted, it would be a lot of work...

-Chris
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Feb 3, 2009, at 2:57 PM, Jason Proctor wrote:

>
> >He wrote me and said the same thing. It sounds kind of cheesy but
> >maybe we could send a group letter to the SW engineer and ask/plead
> >that he release it.
>
> in any case, it doesn't need to be a full scale distribution, where
> dodgy things like rights get involved. more like an expansion of the
> development team :-)
>
>
>

Re: [motm] 650 OS Update?

2009-02-03 by Jason Proctor

>If details about the processor and the hardware are known, what's to 
>stop an alternative open-source firmware from being created from 
>scratch?
>
>Granted, it would be a lot of work...

nothing at all. but as you say, fixing the existing OS would 
presumably be several orders of magnitude less effort.

hardware details are easily determined by buying a unit :-)

RE: [motm] 650 OS Update?

2009-02-04 by John L Rice

I'd be up for occasionally assisting with debugging and improving the
current source code if that becomes a reality. I'm a programmer by day but
because of that I'd rather play with modular synthesizers, drums and gongs
when I'm not at work! ;-)  I'm not yet familiar with the language and syntax
etc that the MOTM-650 uses but I'll take a look around and see what it's
like.

John L Rice 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: motm@yahoogroups.com [mailto:motm@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jason
Proctor
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 12:18 PM
To: MOTM
Subject: Re: [motm] 650 OS Update?


>If details about the processor and the hardware are known, what's to 
>stop an alternative open-source firmware from being created from 
>scratch?
>
>Granted, it would be a lot of work...

nothing at all. but as you say, fixing the existing OS would 
presumably be several orders of magnitude less effort.

hardware details are easily determined by buying a unit :-)


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.