Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Thread

Re: [motm] Fw: [AH] SAGE mystery solved

Re: [motm] Fw: [AH] SAGE mystery solved

2000-05-24 by ivancu@aol.com

Truly a great study in "vaporware."

<< But give people something new and spectacular and most couldn't care less. 
 This could be important info for a synth manufacturer. "Don't create a synth 
like the Sage." >>

Years ago (amazingly long ago in terms of electronics technology) I saw the 
Waldorf Wave.  I dreamed of owning a synthesizer like this, yet even among 
artists that can afford such a product there seemed to be few sold.  Reality 
seems to be that many "artists" have barely explored the limits of a Yamaha 
DX7, so they certainly don't need something more advanced.  Synthesizer 
technology has come a long way since the 70's, but has electronic music 
really advanced that much?

Ivan

Re: [motm] Fw: [AH] SAGE mystery solved

2000-05-25 by davevosh@aol.com

In a message dated 00-05-24 11:04:18 EDT, you write:

<< but has electronic music 
 really advanced that much? >>



ivan,
i suspect that question has been posed many, many times since 
henry,schaeffer, varese, stockhausen, dockstader and a host of others began 
practicing the art so many years ago.........
best,
dave v.

Re: [motm] Fw: [AH] SAGE mystery solved

2000-05-25 by elhardt@aol.com

>>Fellow MOTM user Ken E. shows off his rendering proweress! Clink on the
 second link.
 Now if he would be so kind as to do the same for MOTM... :)
 Paul S.<<

When I saw the posting that somebody needed a photo of an MOTM system for an 
ad, I thought too bad I didn't model the MOTM.  I could have done any type of 
lighting, camera angle and number of modules you wanted.  But I have to move 
on to other things, like building the rest of my MOTM kits.

-Elhardt

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.