MOTM

In a message dated 8/4/00 7:46:00 AM, johns@... writes:

<< I have one 420 and it's been suggested that a twin 420 could be used in

tandem.  >>

Lots of talk about the 420 and 440 here; what does everyone think of the 410?

Ivan

Also pretty freakin' great. It adds instant movement to any source in its
conventional use, but it's also really neat to put an audio signal in there
and NOT have any movement--i.e. set the rate to "zero." Then you have three
outputs, each manually set to a different frequency--instant
frequency-dependent panning. Then introducing a CV into the sweep can allow
you to adjust the whole shebang up and down while keeping the frequencies
the same distance apart.

It sounds amazing on string machines (Crumar Performer) and even great on a
TB-303 if you can believe it. Think big and swirly. Of course you can use a
mono output as well, but that's no fun ;)

David.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ivancu@... [mailto:ivancu@...]
> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 4:41 PM
> To: motm@egroups.com
> Subject: Re: [motm] Sale prices? 420? - 410?
> 
> 
> 
> In a message dated 8/4/00 7:46:00 AM, johns@... writes:
> 
> << I have one 420 and it's been suggested that a twin 420 
> could be used in
> 
> tandem.  >>
> 
> Lots of talk about the 420 and 440 here; what does everyone 
> think of the 410?
> 
> Ivan
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ------<e|-
> Remember four years of good friends, bad clothes, explosive
> chemistry experiments.
> http://click.egroups.com/1/8013/6/_/529958/_/965428866/
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ------|e>-
> 
> 
>

In a message dated 00-08-04 19:12:41 EDT, you write:

<< what does everyone think of the 410? >>



ivan,
i`m very fond of mine. i`ve found it to be a very "smooth" sound modifier. to 
my ears, more of an enhancement device ( nee post-processor ) as opposed to a 
total sound mangler like my doepfer triple resonator. i`m glad to have both 
as each has its place in the scheme of things. now to get the version from 
technosaurus and have a "triple vcf shoot-out"........
best,
dave v.

In a message dated 8/4/2000 4:16:21 PM, ivancu@... writes:

>Lots of talk about the 420 and 440 here; what does everyone think of the
>410?

FWIW, I'd say get the 420 first (since it's both high pass and low pass), 
then the 440 (the best LPF around), then the 410. The 410 is a very different 
beast. As Vosh said, it's more of a processor type module than most VCLPFs 
are, and I find it a kind of weird module (with the onboard LFOs). It is a 
great filter though, and very useful for animating sounds (as others have 
said) -- ya gotta get all three, but you'll need all the other stuff too, 
like lotsa VCOs, EGs, VCAs, etc.

JB