Re: [motm] Re: true LFO Delay (also long!)
2000-11-05 by jhaible@t-online.de
Creating delayed vibrato with envelope and VCA is ok - many synths do this. But there is one method I like better: That's the way it's done in Roland's Vocoder Plus. There you have a double-T type sine wave oscillator which is damped such that it cannot oscillate. When a key is depressed, a variable delay is started, and after that delay a transistor switches the sine oscillator to being slightly undamped. So it starts oscillating, amplitude building up in a "natural" way until it reaches a point where nonlinear feedback prevents it from further growing. Is this the same as an ordinary LFO, gated with an exponentially rising envelope ? Maybe so, but I gave not made in depth comparisons so far. I have built it once, as part of my JH-720 performance synth, and I like it very much. In a way it's less flexible than a full blown envelope / VCA / LFO solution in that you don't have extra control over the rise time (which is coupled to the oscillator's own frequency). But then again this "natural" coupling of rise time and modulation frequency is part of the increadibly "natural" feel of the whole circuit. (And you still have the delay time fully variable). And the sine wave is very pure - you cannot accidetially start to gate it open other than on it's zero crossing. I for one prefer it to the "ordinary" solution by far: I have them both side by side in the JH-720, and I'm always using the "Vocoder Plus" option. So what about a dedicated MOTM Delay Vibrato module ? JH.