#500 has lived its life without proper birthday parties. I would love to finally give it one. Any other history would also be nice to know. For instance, when I took #500 to Dallas Arbiter in the 70's, the guy that tuned it up said that he had seen it before and that it had been on a tour. I thought I was the original purchaser, but apparently not. I paid $2900 for it from a shop in Boston. It was in mint condition when I bought it, so I can't complain. I'd like to know who the original purchaser was and who it went on tour with. Also, #500 has metal parts with #497 scratched off and #500 carved into them...in different "handwriting". I'm curious as to what ever happened to the real #497. Bernie --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, Chris Dale wrote: > > I need to find out #259. > > If we all entered our serial numbers on this list at one time, we could get > a better idea of what still exists and from what eras - (Streetly / > Mellotronics / Sound Sales etc.) and also Martin wouldn't have to run back > and forth to look these up. > > What doth though thinketh? > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 10:54 PM, wrote: > > > ** > > > > > > ** > > So then my guess would be close. I know that 1541 was purchased in late > > 1973 or very early in 1974. > > > > In a message dated 1/14/2013 12:48:10 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, > > markpringnz@... writes: > > > > > > > > Just checked back in the archives of the list, as I remember Martin very > > kindly looked up #1565's birthday a few years ago and it was 15th August > > 1974, > > > > Mark > > > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 6:08 PM, john barrick wrote: > > > >> ** > >> > >> > >> That was a joke, Tony. We've seen these build dates and purchase dates > >> fluctuate all over the map, and unless Martin and John can find the list, I > >> don't think we'll ever know for sure. I agree, just out of curiosity, it > >> would be nice to know. > >> > >> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Tony wrote: > >> > >>> ** > >>> > >>> > >>> *Same here interested, mine's #510 and been under the impression it > >>> was a 1972 build.* > >>> *Don't think so now after seeing 1407 with a much earlier date estimate. > >>> * > >>> *Tony* > >>> > >>> ** > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> john barrick > >> > >> *Leo got it right the first time* > >> *then he added a second pickup and got it righter* > >> > >> > > > > >
Message
Re: Mellotron serial # dating.
2013-01-14 by tron400
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.