The Mellotron Group group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

The Mellotron Group

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:38 UTC

Message

Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Mellotron/Clavia samples

2007-12-10 by jaspercolvin

In a message dated 12/10/2007 7:09:03 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
mike.dickson@gmail.com writes:

Hmmm.  Fair enough. I was surprised by it being referred to as 'junk' 
simply  because the sound that comes out of it is not actually all that 
bad -  certainly better than a lot of what the M-Tron has to  offer.

Mike
 




That's true, Mike, unless you are using M-Tron samples in it. I think  
$2,600.00 US seems a lot for a machine that is so limited. If the Nord  is in the 
same price range, I would certainly go with it. I also thing that  M/A would pay 
more attention to the quality of the samples that are in it. I've  often 
wondered why so many of the folks who sell samples seem to think that the  
crappier they sound, the more authentic they are.
 
It seems obvious to me that when they were designed, Mellotrons  were 
intended to be reliable and at least somewhat consistent in their  sound reproduction.
 
Frank



**************************************See AOL's top rated recipes 
(http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.