Re: [oberheim] Digest Number 440
2010-04-14 by Chris Goumas
Agreed, I've had both and if you can spare the rack space the 6r is the way to go. Also I can't tell the difference sound wise between the two. Sent from my iPad On Apr 14, 2010, at 6:32 AM, oberheim@yahoogroups.com wrote: OBERHEIM SYNTH Messages In This Digest (3 Messages) 1a. Help me with a Matrix 100 vs. 6R decision... From: bob_at_work_2000 1b. Re: Help me with a Matrix 100 vs. 6R decision... From: ogusa@... 1c. Re: Help me with a Matrix 100 vs. 6R decision... From: Alen Rusko View All Topics | Create New Topic Messages 1a. Help me with a Matrix 100 vs. 6R decision... Posted by: "bob_at_work_2000" tttsystems@... bob_at_work_2000 Tue Apr 13, 2010 8:33 pm (PDT) Hi group. I recently purchased an Oberheim 1000 and a 6R, listened to both and like what I hear, but think I only have room for one of these babies....decisions, decisions. Here is what I am weighing....1000 presets, editable via software in mono before external effects or 100 presets, editable via front panel or software, in possibly stereo or layered, but limited to 4/2 or 3/3? voice division. Sonically, the units seem the same although I have not tried an apples with apples voice comparison....so what are your thoughts on which I should keep? Bob El Segundo, CA Back to top Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post Messages in this topic (3) 1b. Re: Help me with a Matrix 100 vs. 6R decision... Posted by: "ogusa@..." ogusa@... stublito Tue Apr 13, 2010 8:49 pm (PDT) Gee the M1000 is only one rack space. That said, if you can spare the rack space keep the 6R. Bi-timbral/separate outs/front panel editing is definitely better. I have a M1000 because I can't spare the extra rack spaces. Only 2 banks of the M1000 are editable, the rest are ROM, though I just use sysex to tweak the ROM sounds as I go. Stublito Quoting bob_at_work_2000 <tttsystems@...>: > Hi group. I recently purchased an Oberheim 1000 and a 6R, listened > to both and like what I hear, but think I only have room for one of > these babies....decisions, decisions. Here is what I am > weighing....1000 presets, editable via software in mono before > external effects or 100 presets, editable via front panel or > software, in possibly stereo or layered, but limited to 4/2 or 3/3? > voice division. Sonically, the units seem the same although I have > not tried an apples with apples voice comparison....so what are your > thoughts on which I should keep? > > Bob > El Segundo, CA > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > Back to top Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post Messages in this topic (3) 1c. Re: Help me with a Matrix 100 vs. 6R decision... Posted by: "Alen Rusko" analogfreak2005@... analogfreak2005 Wed Apr 14, 2010 12:43 am (PDT) Definitely 6R!! You can get all Mx1000 programs on the internet, and you can load them via Midi. Also you can do split/layer with 6R!!!! Only thing that it has 127 RAM program places less than Mx1000.(only drawback). Anyway, I'll go with 6R... Alen --- On Wed, 4/14/10, ogusa@... <ogusa@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: ogusa@... <ogusa@...> Subject: Re: [oberheim] Help me with a Matrix 100 vs. 6R decision... To: oberheim@yahoogroups.com Date: Wednesday, April 14, 2010, 5:49 AM Gee the M1000 is only one rack space. That said, if you can spare the rack space keep the 6R. Bi-timbral/separate outs/front panel editing is definitely better. I have a M1000 because I can't spare the extra rack spaces. Only 2 banks of the M1000 are editable, the rest are ROM, though I just use sysex to tweak the ROM sounds as I go. Stublito Quoting bob_at_work_ 2000 <tttsystems@earthlin k.net>: > Hi group. I recently purchased an Oberheim 1000 and a 6R, listened > to both and like what I hear, but think I only have room for one of > these babies....decisions , decisions. Here is what I am > weighing.... 1000 presets, editable via software in mono before > external effects or 100 presets, editable via front panel or > software, in possibly stereo or layered, but limited to 4/2 or 3/3? > voice division. Sonically, the units seem the same although I have > not tried an apples with apples voice comparison.. ..so what are your > thoughts on which I should keep? > > Bob > El Segundo, CA > > > > ------------ --------- --------- ------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > Back to top Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post Messages in this topic (3) RECENT ACTIVITY 3 New Members Visit Your Group Sitebuilder Build a web site quickly & easily with Sitebuilder. New business? Get new customers. List your web site in Yahoo! Search. Check out the Y! Groups blog Stay up to speed on all things Groups! Need to Reply? Click one of the "Reply" links to respond to a specific message in the Daily Digest. Create New Topic | Visit Your Group on the Web Messages | Files | Photos MARKETPLACE Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now. Welcome to Mom Connection! Share stories, news and more with moms like you. Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests. Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Individual | Switch format to Traditional Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe