In a message dated 9/10/2006 12:56:34 P.M. Central Standard Time,
drmabuce@yahoo.com writes:
CUSTOMERS are eager participants in the tango-macarbre of
specsmanship. They are just as culpable for the hysteria as the
manufacturers who feed them this malarky. Psychoacoustic research ***
shows that the amount of mucus in the listeners ear canal at the time
of perception makes a much larger impact on perceived spectrum than
any change that can be made in the transmitting hardware.
It's so true. After the stereo business, I went to work for a music
instrument retailer. Although I was not in sales per se in either , it was
amazing to see what the customer wanted. This was fed for the most part by
advertising and whatever performing idol they worshipped. If you tried to carry
something different, it died a cruel death. I remember in particular the Kawai
K5000 and Yamaha FS1R. They were just too different to be appealing to the
mainstream. I finally quit taking publications like Electronic Musician,
Keyboard, etc., because I found myself falling into that trap of "If I only had
this piece of gear, I could make some real music!" That is one of the things I
enjoy about the modular "community" . It seems to be populated more with people
trying to tailor an instrument that fits what they do ,rather than what they are
told they should have. I know that's not totally true , there is some hype, just
not as much and as intense. At least that's the way it appears to
me. Harry
D