Hi Doc, > While i realize that the I.D. and the N.R. are both considered > random voltage generators, under the hood, they are VERY different > devices. But let me ask a couple of basic questions before i spew a > bunch of information that may be of no interest to you at all... Well i'm very interested to hear this bunch of information, so please go ahead!!! > > Is the difference between analog white noise and digital noise > critical to your application? > Actually difficult to say, but i understand that both the NR and the ID are generating analog white noise, but why could it be critical to an application?, i'm very interested to learn more about the possibilities of noise > and... > > do you already have a digital audio noise source? Yes i have one, i have a Hewlett PackerD HOI-3722A Noise generator. Which is a scientific unit. I think it's digital. But it can make a lots of (different) noise... > > The answer to those questions makes a difference in the comparison. > > -doc Well i'm very interested to hear more about this subject, Thanks Matthieu > > > --- In wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com, "matthieuvandiepen" <matthieu@> > wrote: > > > > Does anybody know the differences, the pros, the cons of the two > noise units: > > > > Wiard noise ring versus Blacet improbability drive > > > > - if you have the noise ring, can you do without the ID? Or does it > have some sides which > > the noise ring doesn't cover? > > > > Thanks very much, > > > > Matthieu > > >
Message
Re: Wiard noise ring versus Blacet improbability drive
2007-01-27 by matthieuvandiepen
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.