Wiardgroup

After Doc responds, I will add something as well....

gary



"matthieuvandiepen" <matthieu@...> wrote:
>
> Hi Doc,
> 
> >   While i realize that the I.D. and the N.R. are both considered
> > random voltage generators, under the hood, they are VERY different
> > devices. But let me ask a couple of basic questions before i spew a
> > bunch of information that may be of no interest to you at all...
> 
> Well i'm very interested to hear this bunch of information, so
please go 
> ahead!!!
> 
> > 
> > Is the difference between analog white noise and digital noise
> > critical to your application? 
> > 
> Actually difficult to say, but i understand that both the NR and the
ID are 
> generating analog white noise, but why could it be critical to an
application?, 
> i'm very interested to learn more about the possibilities of noise
> 
> > and...
> > 
> > do you already have a digital audio noise source?
> 
> Yes i have one, i have a Hewlett PackerD HOI-3722A Noise generator.
Which 
> is a scientific unit. I think it's digital. But it can make a lots
of (different) noise...
> 
> > 
> > The answer to those questions makes a difference in the comparison.
> > 
> > -doc 
> 
> Well i'm very interested to hear more about this subject,
> 
> Thanks Matthieu
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > 
> > --- In wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com, "matthieuvandiepen" <matthieu@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Does anybody know the differences, the pros, the cons of the two
> > noise units:
> > > 
> > > Wiard noise ring versus Blacet improbability drive
> > > 
> > > - if you have the noise ring, can you do without the ID? Or does it
> > have some sides which 
> > > the noise ring doesn't cover?
> > > 
> > > Thanks very much,
> > > 
> > > Matthieu
> > >
> >
>